Agree to disagree I guess,
I mean not really an option on the website were we index and you're trying to push for it and then just proceeded to continue arguing it. If you reply, I'm going to have to reply back.
Nintendo has retconned a lot of things and yet even "recent" works like Hyrule Historia actually provide us more evidences about the fight between ALTTP Link and Ganon, stating the fight lasted entire DAYS.
Do you really not know what an OUTLIER is? I'm actually asking, there seems to be a difference in our definitions of that word.
Nobody is saying the fight didn't happen, the fact the fight happened at all is
WHY it's an outlier/PIS, at least, was, I'm liable to say Link beat him using hax and it's more a skill feat now.
That isn't Hyrule Historia either by the way, that's a statement from
2002, on the old Zelda Universe website, you're literally over a decade off; that predates:
- 2002 - The Wind Waker
- 2003 - Four Swords
- 2004 - Four Swords Adventures
- 2004 - The Minish Cap
- 2006 - Twilight Princess
- 2007 - Phantom Hourglass
- 2009 - Spirit Tracks
- 2011 - Skyward Sword
- 2013 - A Link Between Worlds
- 2015 - Tri Force Heroes
- 2017 - Breath of the Wild
- 2023 - Tears of the Kingdom
- 2024 - Echoes of Wisdom
Remakes / HD versions / collections in that span
- 2002 - A Link to the Past & Four Swords
- 2002 - Ocarina of Time Master Quest
- 2003 - Collector's Edition
- 2004 - Classic NES Series: The Legend of Zelda
- 2004 - Classic NES Series: Zelda II: The Adventure of Link
- 2011 - Ocarina of Time 3D
- 2011 - Four Swords Anniversary Edition
- 2013 - The Wind Waker HD
- 2015 - Majora's Mask 3D
- 2016 - Twilight Princess HD
- 2019 - Link's Awakening
- 2021 - Skyward Sword HD
Spin-offs / Zelda-linked side games
- 2007 - Link's Crossbow Training
- 2014 - Hyrule Warriors
- 2016 - Hyrule Warriors Legends
- 2018 - Hyrule Warriors: Definitive Edition
- 2019 - Cadence of Hyrule
- 2020 - Hyrule Warriors: Age of Calamity
- 2025 - Hyrule Warriors: Age of Imprisonment
Books and shit
- Hyrule Historia
- Zelda Encyclopedia
- Every 1st party guide with lore I'm not listing 50+.
Again, don't matter if Link beat him via hax and stats, but you have to reconcile your scaling with any potential contradictions from
all of these other things, and sure some don't matter at all, like AoC obviously isn't effecting anything, but games like SS, ALBW, TP, EOW, and more do.
There is a retcon about how he wasn't defeated,
Nobody is saying he wasn't defeated. The problem is
HOW. And if that
how is internally consistent within the setting.
Soul dura negging is
not AP. Holy duraneg is
not AP. Shit that involves nulling his power
is NOT AP.
You want to scale Link literally multiple infinites above something we
know he's weaker than for a fact, but not just something he's weaker than, but literally something weaker than the thing you're trying to scale him to.
as the game initially suggested, since you know I do agree they change things after decades, but they didn't really change the fact that a Link could face off for days against a being with the full triforce in his possesion.
First off I'm pretty sure they actually did, they never mention it lasting days ever again, which byitself don't mean much, but I'm pretty sure a more a recent description of the fight has it mention it was set to the backdrop of a sunset? That doesn't matter though, you have a failure in understanding what an outlier or inconsistency is which seems to be the crux of this whole argument here.
The fight
can happen,
the fact the happened is what makes it an issue.
From what I can gather here, in your mind it only doesn't count if it never happened at all and was retconned, but that isn't how it works. This is why we have PIS, outliers, and more, to begin with, because shit CAN happen and still be wrong.
As said, would you argue Batman is actually 2-C statwise for harming characters we know he's actually infinitely weaker than with thousands of contradictory statements and examples? Those scenes still happened, they never got retconned, that doesn't change the fact they're inconsistent and wrong comparatively to the general standing and incoherent with other batches of information. Even worse here, you'd be arguing Batman would be 2-C for harming say, Superman, but he also used red suns, kryptonite, and magic all in one, inside a mecha suit, to harm him, ignoring those exploits nullify any means of scaling directly even if it wasn't an outlier/PIS.
Or hmm, ya know Zelda might have other examples too like start of game TOTK vs Ganon or Deku Link vs Majora.
And it is also like a MAJOR point in the timeline,
Doesn't matter dude,
EVERY FINAL BOSS is a major point in the timeline. A stronger Link with stronger stuff being infinitely weaker than the full TF and only being relative to two pieces while having his own piece which he explicitly needed to even the gap and you spend half the game getting it otherwise it's impossible to win is
also a major point in the timeline, and, is in fact, the culmination for that same throughline given it's a direct sequel.
Ganon achieving the full triforce by defeating OOT Link is what made that downfall timeline to exist to begin with.
No, Ganon defeating Link
at all is what made the downfall timeline exist.
Him having TF is what made it so
he literally could not be defeated because he was so powerful so they BFR'd his ass instead.
And you know that is ridiculous? That we scale the Link who succeded in slaying that Ganon what? Large island level?
Arguments from incredulity are not real arguments.
Isn't it ridiculous a piece of wood is like the strongest shit in the whole verse bar literal gods? A lil yeah, but it's still true.
Meanwhile OOT Link who FAILED is Low 5-B, isn't it clear that ALTTP Link should at very least scale to that Link?
Which one has ToC that we learn in the direct sequel is stronger than the MS by itself and everything ALTTP Link had?
Which Link is the Link that had to rely on soul damage to win instead of stats per your own scans and arguments?
No he shouldn't, because you've not just argued but even
gave proof that ALTTP Link defeated Ganon by destroying/harming his soul, not because he boxed him, and even if he was,
it's a contradiction to everything that came after.
Actually above, should be. Also the site has possibly, and likely keys. We can scale ALTTP Link to At least 5-B, possibly Tier 3/2 whatever you want to scale Full triforce ganon to.
Yeah possibly and likely for when it's actually a very good chance we just aren't 100% sure. That is not what's happening here.
You're taking the fact the fight was never retconned out of existence to mean it's legit, ignoring that Link had to hax him to win instead of relying on stats (literally even, you can not beat Ganon without soul damage, he
never goes down no matter how many times you hit him), ignoring
a whole other game showing us this:
Full Triforce >>> (greater than the sum of its parts/omnipotent compared to everything else in the setting in terms of magical output/literally explained in game that if Yuga got Link's he be outright invincible and drastically stronger than he already was) > Yuganon with ToP and ToW =~ Link with LV3 Master Sword, Light Arrows, and ToC (the latter of which is made a point he
needed it otherwise he simply would not be powerful enough or ave the means to defeat Yuga with what he had) >>> LV3 Master Sword by itself because game literally goes out of its way to say that isn't enough to rival two, you need one too ALTTP Link.
You are outright trying to ignore the whole plot of another game, for a single beat in one that came 30 years prior. While ignoring the literal
thousands of other statements and showings to the contrary that it'd be feasible to raw box the full TF.
The idea of ALTTP Link being weaker than OOT is crazy IMO.
Arguments from incredulity are not real arguments nor sufficient proof.
OOT Link has the ToC, plus 6x amp, and direct scaling to other incarnations.
Also, honestly, the idea of blood moon sometimes being an illusion and other times being a legit moon pull is way more ambiguous than Link possibly scaling to a character he defeated because omnipotent statement taken literally,
Uh, no it isn't, because that idea is wrong because they explicitly state in game like a dozen times it's the real moon? Headcanon is not a real argument, especially when the games state otherwise. They literally verbatim states it's the moon itself being effected.
especially when you can make Link scaling lower while being in that tier at the same time,
You can't actually because of IW. Ganon has that feat and then later in the game the squad is fighting him, goes "we're doing it, we're gonna win!", then nope he's just screwing with them, he's
never gone all out before, we're told
he was holding back and then stomps them to the point they literally start crashing out because they're so screwed and don't have a chance in hell.
Link > Full Power Ganon > the Ganon that moged them > the squad including Rarui > Ganon doing the feats.
Link doesn't just scale, he
upscales now, assuming you're talking about the 5-A Link.
Unless you mean Majora moondrop? That's just straightforward af.
it's not contradictory and still, ALBW is kinda contradictory itself, if Link needs ToC against two pieces Yuganon it is also true that the game clearly portrays 3 pieces as well above 2, and STILL claims ALTTP Link WON over that Ganon.
Nope because Link also had a bunch of help there too to offset, any single fact alone
would not have been enough.
You're missing the entire point.
If a
stronger Link needed the
the same Master Sword on crack, needed holy dura neg, and explicitly a piece of the Triforce himself to have a chance at defeating Yuganon because otherwise it'd be impossible.
There is no world where you can argue that a Link who relied on soulfuckery scales to a Ganon that is infinitely stronger than a character that is stronger by an explicitly uncontestable amount than the Link you're trying to argue scales to in raw stats.
The anti-evil propriety shouldn't be an argument or we wouldn't scale any Link to Ganon, or most of them at least.
It is an argument?
We also just know the anti-evil shit isn't an end all, be all, with the MS, in most cases, and we also know the MS amps people to its level, and we also know its
stronger than most things because we have a direct statement.
Like, you know most Link's
don't scale off Ganon right? What's actually happening is they're scaling off
other shit like, for example, the MS > FS. And the FS > Vaati who is Large Island Level. That chain ignores the anti-evil fuckery entirely. This is the case for most of it.
You're somehow arguing that every other Link shouldn't be scaling ignores how most Link's don't scale via Ganon regardless, bar exceptions where it's literally shown like TP Link physically overpowering Ganon in a contest of raw power, but even worse, doesn't justify the outright excessive amount of contradictions to your MULTIPLE infinite stat leap that is shut down by multiple other games.
Just checked and we do consider Zelda I Link possibly scaling higher because he defeated ToP Ganon, even though weakened by ToW, so I don't get what would be the problem with a possibly rating for ALTTP one.
There's a huge difference between a possibly higher when you're already in the same finite threshold and have back up statements due to White Sword yap being a single step below the MS, all while it still being dubious enough it's only a possibly, and
scaling to something we know is infinitely stronger than something incontestable to something stronger than you.
Like I don't know what you want from me, do I really need to sped like a week gathering the literal, and I'm not joking here, the actual
hundreds to thousands of statements and showings that shoot down this, and then go in depth to the blatant ALBW example, and then further exacerbate this by showing ALTTP Link's stated method for defeating that Ganon is through duraneg anyway so he wouldn't scale anyway.
Like I'm sorry dude but all you've actually done here is show ALTTP Link beat him via soul hax (which lines up with gameplay even as you can't kill him no matter what without it, even with LV3 MS), and also pointed out Moon Pearl and Invul stuff would make it even less worthy of stat scaling.