Ts contradicts the vsbw case by case basis and also contradicts that the anime is faithful to the manga and is supervised by the author
First and foremost before I say anything else I will say that you need to familiarize yourself with our current policies on canonicity as the users in this thread have previously told you several times now.
Author approval alone does not confer canonical status upon adaptations. Such material is considered part of the primary continuity only when the creator or rights holders explicitly confirm its integration into, or priority over, the original timeline—for instance, through statements verifying that specific events, scenes, or elements genuinely occur within it (e.g., "These scenes originate from material in my notes that was omitted from the initial release but belongs in the core story.") Mere involvement, minor supervision, general praise, or characterizations of the work as a "faithful adaptation" remain insufficient to establish new content as official canon; all determinations continue to be made on a case-by-case basis, with these criteria serving as guidelines rather than an exhaustive standard.
Just having general supervision of a adaptation or just giving approval over some general stuff does not constitute as being sufficient to having the anime be canon, there are no exceptions to this so if you simply don't have evidence of the author/creator or rights holder of said series giving an explicitly statement confirming the anime takes priority over the original work or is their true vision that should be taken over their manga then there's simply no point in discussing that. Even with that said you claimed that there was only ever one comment about canonicity and that Vzearr provided in the previous thread which is blatantly untrue since there were other users who weighed in as well, regardless though OP even mentions they spoke to
@Reiner04 as well and dropped it after discussion.
User comment here
Also if anime isn't canon, don't use it unless it's literally just 1:1, and I do mean 1:1 not "well it's close enough", but the very fact it's something that even needs to be brought up is implicative of it being not 1:1 otherwise it wouldn't matter so.....
Now onto the calcs themself
vsbattles.fandom.com
There are several problems in here but right away its using reverse kinetic energy to get speed while working back from the energy yield of a feat which is something we don't allow so that by itself already nukes this as is for the first method they try. With the second method they simply ignore the the cut on impact that holds on a dramatic wide shot
here and take it to mean the glass travelled that distance in a single frame of real time rather than accept for the cinematic wide shot for it is. Also an exclusively anime only scene anyways where nothing close to this happens in the manga.
This one is once again another anime only addition with its own problems in the calc itself as the distance of Baji's movement is significantly wanked to absurd degrees to even get the calc to the value it is while also breaking our calculation rule
here. I'd really rather not have to do a full calc breakdown tho if it can be avoided since I do NOT want to have to do entirely new calcs to show why this stuff doesn't work but if need be then I can.
vsbattles.fandom.com
this calc literally shouldn't even be used since it was rejected and tries to get lifting strength from a dude punching dudes, that is textbook striking strength and psycho rejected it for said reasoning, plus it being anime only and all it deserves the axe.
vsbattles.fandom.com
This one here, specifically the kisaki saving mikey bit here doesn't line up with the original manga version of the feat either with the anime having kisaki run all the way past the dude going a much further distance than the manga with him also throwing the punch while the dude was in slow-mo. Presented in a way the manga does not at all showcase the feat.
vsbattles.fandom.com
This calc for some reason uses freefall for a dude being hit a straight horizontal distance to get some absurdly small timeframe which makes 0 sense. The dude goes 5 meters over the course of
22 frames or 0.91666666666s which would make his actual speed 5.52m/s instead of 88m/s like this calc would suggest. The second feat here too also is absurdly wanked and also breaking the rule
here. There are also inconsistencies pointed out by 2 CGMs in the comments who both rejected the feat so this shouldn't even be used for that alone.
Next one
vsbattles.fandom.com
Kind of a bonus but funnily enough this calc has the opposite problem of the others, the anime timeframe end should be used since the Subsonic+ end uses the old way that blitz timeframes were done. Nerfs it to Subsonic
this is correct the current timeframe used is pretty inflated and comes from very outdated revisions and has no merit really to use anything near that high
I agree with the CRT and the removal of these calcs as a whole for the reasons provided in my post and the OPs own detailed explanations. these gotta go especially since we don't even accept anime canon to begin with already