Like I said, I'm not trying to push Shadow into having Acausality (Type 5).
I know, I was trying to point out that the three of them being interacted by Shadow could give out some antifeats especially if it's physically
The main problem I have with all the feats which is what @Vesxpura said too on dms is that well, they're implicitly stated and not explicitly stated (You should know this difference too more than me) which is sorta the main reason why even the 1-A is placed with a possibly rating, it's not that I oppose the verse or something like that but I don't think the scans are blatant enough to support for a full rating from the past few months, I think the staff would still disagree with a possibly rating for these but other than that it's outside what I could input anyway
just to clarify, i dont have a problem with it being implicit. im all for analysing deeper into any literature, the point of interest is the fact that frankly the arguments are just interpretations of the scans not exactly something u would expect as an argument, that is, its not a logically valid conclusion, funnily enough, he tries to justify his interpretation by using other arguments that fall under this exact problem.
Well, since the tier is being treated as a “possibly” rating, I can see the abilities being handled the same way. I don't have any objections to that, so, I guess this is fine.
This seems like anti feat for VSBW Jesus if he was rejected
Okay. That seems reasonable to me as well then.
Sorry, but it comes across as a bit dismissive, since there's a substantial amount of new evidence presented here that supports its credibility (I can pretty much list them). Much I'd like to agree with your decision, the previous threads doesn't have some of the scans presented in the OP and thus lack a complete analyzation. While of course there may be some similarities here and there, the overall premise of this thread is fundamentally different from the previous ones.
I never knew one disagree is enough to close it, since @DarkDragonMedeus is literally sharing the same view in putting a possibly rating as @Udlmaster puts it. Why do I get the feeling that you're trying to rush this thread into closing?@Vietthai96
Do you disagree with this thread in its entirety and think that it should be closed, or do you consider any of Udlmaster's points to be sensible here?
I wasn't referring to you there. That message was directed specifically at Ant, since from what I've seen in his previous replies, his immediate response always seems to be “should we close this”, and it somehow keeps coming up repeatedly when there's a slight disagreement on the thread. This surprised me.
Shouldn't the upgrade be 2-A instead of possible low 1-C ?
vro js let them have it atp. possibly low 1-C deadass does nothing,
What about with: (Type 2) possibly (Type 3)
Deadass seeing the scan with your eyes closed. His stance on possibly rating for Low 1-C comes from the previous threads, which does have superiority over creations as a whole. This thread is kind of a complement to that.
Low 1-C isnt even possible here, dk how people are restricting it all the way to Low 1-C.
ikr
I honestly didn't even see Low 1-C, but i'm being lenient to the verse, as you can possibly argue for the Void to be > reality
You scale scale into higher-dimensional tiers while being undimensioned.
Huh?? Dimensionless places cannot be higher dimensions what do you mean? Unless this what the wiki follows
That's not what I said though. I said undimensioned objects can scale to higher-dimensional tiers. I didn't say undimensioned objects can be higher-dimensional.
Pretty sure type 1 Beyond-Dimensional existence denotes that you can be undimensioned and still comparable to dimensional structures in general.
