• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Damage3245
Reaction score
35,014

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Hi there! Could you by any chance help and give your input on this thread? It's a straightforward thread about Supernatural Willpower and won't take up much of your time. Thanks in advance!

    Hello I apologize for bothering you again but could I please kindly ask for your very quick input on this CGM thread regarding the recalc of several feats? The reason I am messaging CGMs directly is because the thread has been up for nearly 2 months with no staff input even though a conseus has been reached with a majority agreement for the recalcs including some of the people who did the calcs themselves, thanks in advance :3

    Hello, could you please provide feedback on this thread?
    Faa_Tzy
    Faa_Tzy
    Bump
    Faa_Tzy
    Faa_Tzy
    Bump, as someone who is knowledgeable, are you interested in evaluating?
    Hello damage, it's me again, could I pwease ask you for your thoughts on this ENO recalc suggestion? Thanks in advance :3
    Hello, can you check this minor thread of mine? If you have a free time, feel free to give us ur input. Thank you.
    Could ya please comment here? I need a third staff approval because Hazbin is in controversial verses, and two staffs currently agree with current OP.
    If we could borrow some of your time here.
    Whenever you're available, are you capable of reviewing this CRT? Just two abilities being proposed for a character so it should be a relatively quick job.

    Hello, i just posted this crt, pretty simple one, If you have a free time feel free to give your input. Thanks.
    Could you check out this crt? It’s pretty simple, only 2 sentences long
    Hi, could you take a look at this calc thread?
    Can you please check this CRT?
    Hello, i just posted this Abilities Additions thread, if you have a free time, feel free to give your input. Thank you 🙏
    Hello @Damage3245
    Just wondering.
    If a character can move so fast that another character can't even see them, would we grant them a 6x (current speed blitz value, I think?), a speed multiplier based on speed blitzing?

    For example, A chaarcter doing this feat to a Mach 1 character would be Mach 6, or?
    Hello as promised I made a meteor CGT! Therefir already gave his opinion and Floxy said he would comment either today or tomorrow but I'd appreciate your opinion as well! Thanks in advance :3

    Hello, I am wondering if you could take a look at this?
    Hi, could you evaluate this calc thread please? 🙏

    Hello, i just posted a minor thread regarding new key. If you have a free time, feel free to give your input. Thank you. 🙏
    Can I comment here?
    Hi! Sorry if I am inturrupting something but I'd like to ask you something:

    Could you make sure I did this correctly? I'm not too familiar with calculating the force needed to tear muscle, joints, etc...
    Hello I apologize for bothering you(again) but could I kindly ask for your opinion on changing the sage Centipede calculation? It already has approval from one calc member(Therefir) and he also agreed to do a calc based on my suggested method, we just need 1 or 2 more calc members to weigh in to get it approved, thanks in advance! :3

    (The thread was also moved to the appropriate location and the imgur links work now yey!)

    id like to ask if you could comment on this crt.
    Hello @Damage3245, you have some time for a quick CRT?

    This will be the lowest value of the verse, and will be used to start the chain scaling
    Heyo, could I please comment on your LS staff thread? I think I have some input that might be nice to share. 🥺
    DavidTPPM
    DavidTPPM
    Well most importantly, I think the idea of looking at this with "oh X can lift a mountain just because he can do this" is extremely misleading. We already know moving an object can scale massively above the objects namesake tier or GBE, and this is no different. And LS is no different 99.9% of the time a feat that includes throwing an object is going to scale immensely above said objects mass because the moment it's moving you're multiplying it by the velocity. So as long as the feat is biomechanically a feat of lifting it shouldn't be ignored just because we think it seems crazy.
    To put it simply, it's like making a rule against KE just because we don't like how it gives big results.

    Second of all, the issue of having to lift the object "over a period of time" has been addressed in a very recent CRT where even you commented iirc, which basically ended up concluding with people saying you can't really apply such rules because it's just objectively wrong. It's pretty obvious throwing a giant boulder or swinging a sword the size of a building are blatantly feats of strength and are intended as such and them being performed over a short period should make them more impressive, not less, as that means higher velocity.
    I mean would you say me bicep curling a 30kg dumbbell is not a lifting strength feat because I'm so strong I did it in half a second, but it is a feat for someone weaker than me struggling to slowly curl it over the period of 10 seconds? That doesn't really make sense neither from a perspective of physics nor biology.

    And lastly, while we may be tempted to create a rule that requires the feat to be performed on an object with significantly high mass, that will inevitably end up creating caps that draw a completely arbitrary line with no actual logic behind it. It'd create a situation where character A could throw an object at relativistic speeds and it wouldn't scale anywhere, but character B would throw an object 10x bigger at subsonic speeds and somehow end up scaling millions of times higher. Even tho from the perspective of actual physics, character A is actually the one performing a feat millions of times stronger.
    DavidTPPM
    DavidTPPM
    I'd have to concise the message for the actual thread so this is basically just the raw ideas
    Damage3245
    Damage3245
    Okay, you have permission to comment that.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top