- 8,335
- 8,828
.....You're pulling my leg here. As this is not RVR worthy at allBAN-KAI! Bleach General Discussion
This is actually crazy that senjumaru alone outhaxes most of dragon ball charactersvsbattles.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.....You're pulling my leg here. As this is not RVR worthy at allBAN-KAI! Bleach General Discussion
This is actually crazy that senjumaru alone outhaxes most of dragon ball charactersvsbattles.com
Based on his subsequent comment:.....You're pulling my leg here. As this is not RVR worthy at all
It may be that their mother passed away, and that it’s a sensitive topic for them. In light of that, I don’t think the “pulling my leg” part was really necessary. Just saying.None of them can undo someone who died 12 years ago.
Thank you for letting me know that we can insult our mothers and the wiki approves of it.Based on his subsequent comment:
It may be that their mother passed away, and that it’s a sensitive topic for them. In light of that, I don’t think the “pulling my leg” part was really necessary. Just saying.
But yea @AppleLord that is a relatively tame comment that seems like a joke. We generally don’t take action against that, but if the jokes bother you, I think you should just ask them to not joke around like that with you. Regardless, it would not be a violation of our rules.
Replying with “your mom” is an extremely common joke people use all over the internet. The rules of this wiki emphasize intent more than anything else. That person was not literally insulting your mother, it’s quite literally the first thing that comes to mind when you think of trollish jokes.Thank you for letting me know that we can insult our mothers and the wiki approves of it.
I don’t know what you would like me to say to this.Where I come from you get shot in the streets for this sort of comment.
The intent is there as people keep targeting me and keep talking about it after I mentioned she is been dead for 12 years. Since is not a one time thing multiple people should get warnings. You don’t know what is losing a mother, your dog, and your home as a teenager.Replying with “your mom” is an extremely common joke people use all over the internet. The rules of this wiki emphasize intent more than anything else. That person was not literally insulting your mother, it’s quite literally the first thing that comes to mind when you think of trollish jokes.
Hell, there’s an entire Wikipedia page about it.
I don’t know what you would like me to say to this.
That would be more severe in my book. Not a cool thing to do, yes. For now let’s see if they have anything to say:The intent is there as people keep targeting me and keep talking about it after I mentioned she is been dead for 12 years. Since is not a one time thing multiple people should get warnings. You don’t know what is losing a mother, your dog, and your home as a teenager.
I literally have no idea who this person is, I made a joke loosely implying I got with a stranger's mom.That would be more severe in my book. Not a cool thing to do, yes. For now let’s see if they have anything to say:
@SlendVeny
SlendVeny didn't continue to "keep targeting" him after posting that, or at least not publicly. Neither did anybody in that thread do anything against him. Misdeeds are being invented to suit the report, I suspect.
@AppleLord, you have over 11,000 posts on this forum and in all likelihood an immense span of time spent on the general internet. I can think of no reality in which you have never heard of "ur mom" jokes and cannot understand how you are treating it as such an insanely overblown slight. This rule violation reports thread is intended to offer a means of rectifying genuine issues and is not a means of siccing the staff on someone. The report as it stands is incredibly childish and we won't be taking it seriously barring some substantiation of your vague claim of harassment.
Furthermore: while I am telling you to be less hypersensitive to the common lingo of the internet, I will invite you to be more sensitive to the emotions of others. SlendVeny did not slight you by any stretch of the imagination, but your selfishness in asserting that nobody else would understand the imagined harm of this situation because nobody else has lost a loved one as a child, is absurd.
This thread is not yours to turn into a circus. Move along.
The nature of Bambu's response was provoked not only by the manner in which you responded to the original comment, but also the way in which you responded to Catzlaflame.
You had the option of explaining to Slend that it is a sensitive topic and ask him not to make those sorts of jokes. That you recognize the frequency of "your mom" jokes means you should've known its not report worthy. Ultimately all that you accomplished was putting a spotlight on what would've otherwise been a joke forgotten minutes after it was made.
No one is dismissing what you have been through, but the way you went about this was not constructive at all. Even now you're describing the joke as "minimizing her death." Despite the fact that this person didn't even know about it.
Telling me to just "cry into a pillow" shows an appalling lack of empathy for the trauma of losing my mother. Rather than doubling down with toxic dismissiveness, real strength would be recognizing suffering outside your limited experience with some basic human decency. If this is the mentality this "community" fosters towards grief and pain, it's a sad indictment you should reflect on.
HimNo, hard disagree. Just wait till Fuji deals with this problem.
MeDude, the bad news for you is no one's gonna wait for Fuji and her decisions. So instead of desperately going into "come on fuji, come here and do something about it" mode and refusing "just to refuse", share your thoughts about why you disagree. Or don't share
HimSimple, kratos killing the undead creatures in specific way, either bypassing their immortality or damaging them beyond what they can recover/regenerate from, is not any form of immortality negation, nor regeneration negation.
Then tell me, what is it?
Uh, let me guess. So manipulating fate is not really a fate manipulation according to you, right? Just like permanently killing immortal beings is not immortality negation...
I do want to state that I have the intelligence of a half-dead goldfish, so there's a slight chance I'll slip up, but I'll try to remember this.Anyways, this may not be report-worthy but we should take note that AppleLord has PTSD from losing his mother and tell @SlendVeny to never make those types of jokes against him ever again.
Yes, "your mom" jokes and all that is meant for banter but provoking trauma is something extremely serious.
No more comments regarding this topic.We don't need to make a big deal out of this.
I think it's pretty easy to tell its a joke by all caps
was asked to put it up soAs with any other instance, a report of a staff member goes to HR, not to the RVR. And for that matter, we don't take uncontextualised off-site comments seriously by themselves.
Also, don't use the RVR to promote a Discord server, for god's sake. You should all know better.
I already did in Discord PMs. What happened was sudden and I didn't even know.I agree with DarkGrath, friends or not, joking/shitposting on RVR is against the rules. You should all know better. Especially if you're staff, I'd at least expect you to call them out and be the first one to remind them that we do not allow silly posts on RVR.
You don’t care for on screen feats??? good to know if you don’t accept blatant on screen feats then you shouldn’t even be on this site trying to argue
Again if you don’t accept on screen blatant feats then you shouldn’t be on this site as nobody will take you seriously
Keep in mind, the "ignoring blatant feats" was just his argumentation of "it's an amp far beyond limits so it should be at least 2x even without a statement"Bud scared to tag me because I shredded your argument and exposed you for not accepting on screen feats making you lose any credibility in this thread
On screen feats backed up by statements = me right you wrong mental gymnastics won’t change that this site has already accepted saitama growth despite 0 statements and even said it’s a lowball meaning boros is no different
Reporting me because I called you out for talking about me but won’t tag me really lolReporting @darkphantom9805 for his conduct on this thread. Feel free to read the whole thing. The short of it is that he proposed that Boros's Meteoric Burst being an amp that's far beyond his limits and destroys his body in the process should naturally make it an at least 2x amp, even without a direct statement. I responded by saying that our standards go against this, and that lead to a back and forth involving him saying things like:
Also why lie people can go back and see the threads themselves I said statement + on screen feats I’m talking about multiple pieces of evidence to support my claim not 1 single thing like you claimingKeep in mind, the "ignoring blatant feats" was just his argumentation of "it's an amp far beyond limits so it should be at least 2x even without a statement"
Not making things any better for yourself, not to mention I did tag you hereReporting me because I called you out for talking about me but won’t tag me really lol
Nothing I said goes against it because on screen feats is always taken more then statements actually the number 1 thing in any debate or scaling is on screen feats statements are next
Anyway saitama shows this site actually supports me
Not making things any better for yourself, not to mention I did tag you here
If you're defending yourself, feel free, but I don't think this helps at all. Not to mention, multipliers verbatim have to be stated, which you ignored. This will be my last comment so as to not clog the thread. I'll defer to the staff from here on out
He didn’t tag me bruh he exclusively called me out I said something about because he didn’t reply that call out to meHe did tag you.
He is being overly rude, and I don't support that sort of mindset seeping in from more unruly places, although the case still seems minor. I'd accept a warning, although even that is on the heavier end. Shall wait for what others think.
That is good faith on screen feats + statement = me right it’s not because vague statement the site has a speed value for a statue/blitz and it’s more then x2 especially in opm boros did that meaning x2 is a lowballAgreed, he very clearly isn't arguing in good faith. @darkphantom9805, you cannot simply infer specific multiplier values like "2x" from vague statements like "went beyond his limits" or "massive difference because he statued him."
Which is clearly not the point, Clover is clearly going by the wiki standards which your own arguments does not quite support at all. And also, it is not cool for you to start acting so toxicly smug as if it you get you anywhere.
But I'm all in for a hard warning.
Which is clearly not the point, Clover is clearly going by the wiki standards which your own arguments does not quite support at all. And also, it is not cool for you to start acting so toxicly smug as if it you get you anywhere.Reporting me because I called you out for talking about me but won’t tag me really lol
Nothing I said goes against it because on screen feats is always taken more then statements actually the number 1 thing in any debate or scaling is on screen feats statements are next
Anyway saitama multiplier shows this site actually supports me
Also why lie people can go back and see the threads themselves I said statement + on screen feats I’m talking about multiple pieces of evidence to support my claim not 1 single thing like you claiming
His commenting that uses the "@" symbol followed by your username is tagging you.He didn’t tag me bruh he exclusively called me out I said something about because he didn’t reply that call out to me
anyway nothing I’m doing is wrong I have onscreen feats + statement to support me so him lying isn’t going to help is case because if you read the thread I’m not saying 1 statement is enough I’m saying statement backed up by sheer feats is
Damage3245 already addressed this:That is good faith on screen feats + statement = me right it’s not because vague statement the site has a speed value for a statue/blitz and it’s more then x2 especially in opm boros did that meaning x2 is a lowball
Clover is correct. Boros boosting his movements with energy isn't necessarily the same thing as him applying an energy bullet over his strikes and therefore doubling his AP.
The exact one I replied to is him not tagging me bruh do I have to screen shot for you or something? literally called just me out didn’t reply to me with that so i replied to him on the exact lineHis commenting that uses the "@" symbol followed by your username is tagging you.
Moreover, you do not have onscreen feats and statement to support you. You made an inference from them that isn't supported by the content of the scans and statements. You're now accusing Clover of lying, when all he really did is explain that factually the evidence you are relying on is insufficient to reach the conclusion you're advocating for. This is inappropriate, Clover is correct here.
Moreover I do have on screen feats and statement to support me the feats I haven’t posted scans but I stated what they were because I already assumed everyone in the thread has read opm meaning the know the feat I talked aboutMoreover, you do not have onscreen feats and statement to support you. You made an inference from them that isn't supported by the content of the scans and statements. You're now accusing Clover of lying, when all he really did is explain that factually the evidence you are relying on is insufficient to reach the conclusion you're advocating for. This is inappropriate, Clover is correct here.
You're still wrong. If there's no "2x stronger" statement, it doesn't matter what kinds of other stuff you have. The fact that you're just doubling down on something like this is only making things worse for youhe is lying because he stated I said because this 1 single statement means it’s x2 when I said multiple times that multiple statements + feats = at least x2 means I’m right meaning yes he purposely left out stuff which is called lying
I’m still right and if you want to debate more tag me in the boros thread not in a reporting thread that I’m defending myselfYou're still wrong. If there's no "2x stronger" statement, it doesn't matter what kinds of other stuff you have. The fact that you're just doubling down on something like this is only making things worse for you