- 13,106
- 20,825
I'm not debating any further. You're doubling down on your "lying" accusations that aren't actually true going by our multiplier standards - and I have no plans to engage further if you're gonna keep stonewalling on that matter
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 7,836
- 14,855
I also have no interest in going back and forth. At this point, it's clear darkphantom is not interested in listening to staff members about how our standards of evidence work or even something as simple as what "tagging" means on this forum. I don't expect improvement from this sort of individual. I think we could just apply a warning, but I am inclined to think that the sheer obstinacy in the face of staff correction here would justify a short topic ban from OPM, which may escalate from there depending on if he continues to act this way on future discussions.
- 2,533
- 608
It’s not doubling down you said something that isn’t the case knowing full well that in reality I said it takes more then a statement but statements+ feats meaning that’s called a lie
If you don’t want to debate more then stop tagging me about it like wut?
- 2,533
- 608
Again show where on screen feats isn’t allowed as a rule also a ban for defending myself really show that rule where your not allowed to defend yourself especially on a report
Y’all keep stating the rules but can’t show me the rules where I asked that says these specific things because I 100% doubt site says no on screen feats or statements
- 13,106
- 20,825
Yeah I'm wondering if the sheer doubling down would warrant something serious. DaReaperMan also messaged me about recent threads involving the MCU showing that his behavior there is no different, if that helps at all (these threads are very recent too, the former starting March 29th and the latter starting April 18th, both in 2024)
- 7,836
- 14,855
To be clear, you are not being punished for defending yourself. You are being punished for statements like this:
The fact that you repeatedly ignore these corrections just to repeat the accusation that your opponents are taking some bizarre stance like "you can't use on-screen feats" demonstrates that you are not arguing in good faith. A user should not have to rebut the same inaccurate characterization of their argument several times.
If you insist on taking this unreasonable approach to discussions, I can only think that you will not be a productive presence in an OPM discussion pretty much at all.
This, quite clearly, is not what the issue is. This was explained to you multiple times. No one ever said something like "you can't use on-screen feats." Such a stance would be absurd, and it was explicitly outlined that the issue was that the conclusion you were drawing (2x multiplier) wasn't actually justified by what the scans said or showed. This occurred both on the original thread and during this RVR report:
The fact that you repeatedly ignore these corrections just to repeat the accusation that your opponents are taking some bizarre stance like "you can't use on-screen feats" demonstrates that you are not arguing in good faith. A user should not have to rebut the same inaccurate characterization of their argument several times.
If you insist on taking this unreasonable approach to discussions, I can only think that you will not be a productive presence in an OPM discussion pretty much at all.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 22,730
- 22,209
The purpose of this thread isn't to address the scaling of the given verse, whether he was right or wrong on that point doesn't change whether he did or did not break our rules. We have rules on rudeness in dealing with others, I think he went over the lines drawn by them but not far over them. Discussion of the OPM stuff can take place in the OPM thread, not here.
Deagon puts it well enough.
Deagon puts it well enough.
- 2,533
- 608
y’all did actually you said I’m wrong because of 1 statement when in reality I said I have multiple statement + feats then Y’all said it doesn’t count I ask for specific rules where that isn’t allowed and nobody and give me it just link me to the rules so I can read them cause I can’t find it on phone
How is that not good faith feats > statement both = good literally the most important thing when scaling a character is feats is it not I provide multiple things to support my claim exactly how scaling works
- 8,335
- 8,828
If I may so on these here are some examples of these behaviors taking place in MCU stuff which he has a history of (it's even in the general discussion board):
Point 1
Point 2
Point 3
Point 4
Point 5 (Edit: Was the same link as Point 4, my bad.)
Should just be topic banned from both OPM and MCU imo.
Last edited:
- 31,341
- 34,071
While not the worst argument or attitude I have seen, he sounds very persistent and quite annoying. But our rule page does say we do not assume guesswork multipliers.
- 2,533
- 608
Doesn’t the rule page literally say feats can be used tho
Like I’m not spamming insults and calling people bad names or something that would be bad behavior when arguing the worst things I use when debating are mental gymnastics delusional and common sense and stuff like that
Most of those aren’t even bad 1 of the guys conceded to me another is literally me posting a feat with a quote another is me talking about how the site denied tons of wog and feats for no reason not using insults
Like I’m not spamming insults and calling people bad names or something that would be bad behavior when arguing the worst things I use when debating are mental gymnastics delusional and common sense and stuff like that
Last edited:
- 31,341
- 34,071
Feats with demonstrated calculations yes. But we do not assume 200 Megatons just because is smashed someone who scales from 100 Megaton feat into a puddle of blood or anything like that. Fiction isn't always linear with the AP/Durability gap of RL humans.
Also again, this isn't the thread to be having small talk; this is an RVR thread and arguing back to back should be done on the thread where it is being discussed.
- 7,836
- 14,855
No. As I just explained on your wall, the part of the Multipliers page that says feats can be used is only describing extra evidence that would need to be provided in addition to an explicit statement of a numeric multiplier.
- 12,068
- 6,066
He insulted us once with an image that made almost everyone nervous in DB
Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100
I'm not new to DB VSBW. Ya'll are forgetting what I did on the last big 2-C downgrade thread I got a real debate for ya'll: Goku post 21st Tenkaichi Budokai, healed up, Senzu, vs Jackie Chun with no prior knowledge. Does this give Goku enough of an advantage? Link to where this happened
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 22,730
- 22,209
There's sufficient agreement that the general rudeness is in violation of our rules, if only barely, and so I've added a formal warning to the tracker. If people feel so inclined, they ought to discuss the matter of the legitimacy of his argument in the given thread.
GarrixianXD
University Enthusiast
Any/AllVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 4,338
- 10,616
Meh, that was rather some goofy meme.He insulted us once with an image that made almost everyone nervous in DB
Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100
I'm not new to DB VSBW. Ya'll are forgetting what I did on the last big 2-C downgrade thread I got a real debate for ya'll: Goku post 21st Tenkaichi Budokai, healed up, Senzu, vs Jackie Chun with no prior knowledge. Does this give Goku enough of an advantage? Link to where this happenedvsbattles.com
- 2,533
- 608
What words am I not allowed to use so I don’t seem rude again
Is delusional mental gymnastics and common sense off the table?
Is delusional mental gymnastics and common sense off the table?
- 15,301
- 22,081
I recommend refraining from saying “Anyone with common sense would agree with me” as you usually tend to do in disagreements. It’s just insulting people for not sharing your perspective.
- 2,533
- 608
So no common sense but the others good? How do I say someone who fits those categories then without bad insult
- 13,106
- 20,825
"Delusional mental gymnastics" ain't really good either. Rather than making remarks like this, it's better to just focus on addressing the person's arguments
- 2,533
- 608
I need a list of what can I say at this rate
- 6,865
- 1,317
What's this?
vsbattles.fandom.com
Marty Mcfly
Martin Seamus "Marty" McFly, Sr. is the main protagonist of the Back to the Future franchise, with his 1985 self serving as the main protagonist of both Back to the Future and Back to the Future Part II, the tritagonist of Back to the Future Part III, the deuteragonist of Back to the Future: The...
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 4,599
- 6,496
I have deleted the page and given an instructional warning to the user.What's this?
Marty Mcfly
Martin Seamus "Marty" McFly, Sr. is the main protagonist of the Back to the Future franchise, with his 1985 self serving as the main protagonist of both Back to the Future and Back to the Future Part II, the tritagonist of Back to the Future Part III, the deuteragonist of Back to the Future: The...
- 1,609
- 981
Post in thread 'Naruto to Boruto Discussion Thread'
https://vsbattles.com/threads/naruto-to-boruto-discussion-thread.107558/post-6545638
Reporting for antagonism. They know I recently returned from a ban, and are prodding at that.
https://vsbattles.com/threads/naruto-to-boruto-discussion-thread.107558/post-6545638
Reporting for antagonism. They know I recently returned from a ban, and are prodding at that.
GarrixianXD
University Enthusiast
Any/AllVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 4,338
- 10,616
Nothing I see is report violation worthy, sorry. However, it’s preferable to prevent flamewars and maintain healthy discussion.
Last edited:
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 22,730
- 22,209
Not a rule violation on its own but certainly not conducive to a good discussion environment so I left a message.
- 16,132
- 10,665
So... I think this profile was vandalized or something like that
GarrixianXD
University Enthusiast
Any/AllVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 4,338
- 10,616
Nuked.So... I think this profile was vandalized or something like that
Report to Vandalism Reports Thread or Profile Deletion Requests next time please.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 22,730
- 22,209
Good to report it, but do bear in mind we do have a rather new thread dedicated to vandalism reports, for future reference.
- 31,341
- 34,071
Doesn't look like it was "Vandalized" per say more like just a dreadful page was created. But others said it would be on the vandalism and bad page reports rather than here.So... I think this profile was vandalized or something like that
- 13,106
- 20,825
Reporting @Coomandar for his behavior in this thread, including insults to intelligence and claiming anyone who believes Boros is superior to Tatsumaki is simply a fanboy, such as:
- 31,341
- 34,071
Coomander has been banned multiple times iirc, and they're still being rude to people? Sounds like grounds for a longer ban even including permanent.
Pepsimanslover_69
He/Him- 861
- 482
Reporting this user, https://vsbattles.com/members/borutonarutodebunked.32842/
For this comment,
No, it matters, their immortality must be proven in the game itself. You cannot make baseless claims by supposing they all have their "forms" of immortality. Your ability to judge are beyond pathetic, the immortality that some may have, doesn't actually require immortality negation to end it, simply bypassing the limit of what they can take was show case many times to be enough to do the job. Be it crush to dust or freeze and then shattered, does the job.
For this comment,
No, it matters, their immortality must be proven in the game itself. You cannot make baseless claims by supposing they all have their "forms" of immortality. Your ability to judge are beyond pathetic, the immortality that some may have, doesn't actually require immortality negation to end it, simply bypassing the limit of what they can take was show case many times to be enough to do the job. Be it crush to dust or freeze and then shattered, does the job.
- 13,106
- 20,825
It says 4 times, but that's misleading, as the most recent 3 were all just adjusting the length of Coomandar's ban, eventually settling on 1 month. So, it's more like 2 bans
Pepsimanslover_69
He/Him- 861
- 482
And also this,
Are you blind to the point to ignore the evidence presented? Or are you incompetent to the point not to understand what is presented to you? HE GETS FOOLED BY THE ILLUSIONS AND ONLY GETS OUT ONCE HE SEES THE RING ON THE FURIE FINGER, that is a weakness of their illusion that can be easily exploited, you do not need to overpower such an illusion that is so obviously fake. He doesn't see through them until he has the eyes of truth, every time before, he gets fooled by illusions. I clearly debunked notions above.
Are you blind to the point to ignore the evidence presented? Or are you incompetent to the point not to understand what is presented to you? HE GETS FOOLED BY THE ILLUSIONS AND ONLY GETS OUT ONCE HE SEES THE RING ON THE FURIE FINGER, that is a weakness of their illusion that can be easily exploited, you do not need to overpower such an illusion that is so obviously fake. He doesn't see through them until he has the eyes of truth, every time before, he gets fooled by illusions. I clearly debunked notions above.
- 13,106
- 20,825
Instead of multi-posting, I'd recommend just editing these into your initial report. It's a lot easier that way and doesn't clog up the thread
- 31,341
- 34,071
You do realize you can just click the number on the top right corner of the post. Linking URLs is a lot better than simply copy/pasting their posts. Especially since some could get the wrong idea that you're the one making the comments via saying the hostile parts out loud.
Anyway, I'd give them a warning but I am doing RL stuff atm.
Edit: For example, simply post URLs like this comment.
Pepsimanslover_69
He/Him- 861
- 482
Alr, this user, Borutonarutodebunked, made the following comments.
"Are you blind to the point to ignore the evidence presented? Or are you incompetent to the point not to understand what is presented to you? HE GETS FOOLED BY THE ILLUSIONS AND ONLY GETS OUT ONCE HE SEES THE RING ON THE FURIE FINGER, that is a weakness of their illusion that can be easily exploited, you do not need to overpower such an illusion that is so obviously fake. He doesn't see through them until he has the eyes of truth, every time before, he gets fooled by illusions. I clearly debunked notions above.
No, it matters, their immortality must be proven in the game itself. You cannot make baseless claims by supposing they all have their "forms" of immortality. Your ability to judge are beyond pathetic, the immortality that some may have, doesn't actually require immortality negation to end it, simply bypassing the limit of what they can take was show case many times to be enough to do the job. Be it crush to dust or freeze and then shattered, does the job."
He basically calls me blind, insults my ability to debate and is just really aggressive.
"Are you blind to the point to ignore the evidence presented? Or are you incompetent to the point not to understand what is presented to you? HE GETS FOOLED BY THE ILLUSIONS AND ONLY GETS OUT ONCE HE SEES THE RING ON THE FURIE FINGER, that is a weakness of their illusion that can be easily exploited, you do not need to overpower such an illusion that is so obviously fake. He doesn't see through them until he has the eyes of truth, every time before, he gets fooled by illusions. I clearly debunked notions above.
No, it matters, their immortality must be proven in the game itself. You cannot make baseless claims by supposing they all have their "forms" of immortality. Your ability to judge are beyond pathetic, the immortality that some may have, doesn't actually require immortality negation to end it, simply bypassing the limit of what they can take was show case many times to be enough to do the job. Be it crush to dust or freeze and then shattered, does the job."
He basically calls me blind, insults my ability to debate and is just really aggressive.
Similar threads
