• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Qawsedf234
Reaction score
23,622

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • hi, can you help evaluate this CRT. i think this CRT not hard to be get evaluate. thank you 🙏
    Fairly major One-Punch Man thread that you might be interested in
    Hi! can i have your input here ? It's not a big task even tho it's a major upgrade.
    Excuse me, sorry for bothering your time. Can you give your input to this thread? I've been asking this weeks before.

    Hello can you check this thread?

    Hello Qaws, could you give your opinion on this canonicity thread
    Kachon123
    Kachon123
    Bump. One more staff vote is needed.
    Could you answer this when you have time please?

    Hello @Qawsedf234 would you be willing to review this? Since it's a staff thread and a tier 2 one, it's up to your expertise, from my understanding. Your evaluation would be highly valued.
    Hello Qawsed! Mind taking a look at this CRT ? It needs one more vote to be accepted

    Would like this opened to fix the equation a little: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Lightning_Feats#Energy

    I just think the formatting could be better, currently the section reads like this:

    The energy of electricity can directly be calculated if its current and electrical potential difference is known.

    If the current is a ampere and the electrical potential difference is v volt, then the power of the lightning is given as a*v J/s. Usually 1 second of this is addressed to the AP, unless the electrical flow couldn't be sustained for that long.

    It should be noted that for real electricity enduring a lightning strike usually doesn't require durability equal to the lightnings full energy.
    However it might be better more like this:

    The energy of electricity can directly be calculated if its current and electrical potential difference is known.

    If the current is in amperes and the electrical potential difference is in volts, then the power of the lightning is given as:

    P = I * V

    Usually 1 second of this is addressed to the AP, unless the electrical flow couldn't be sustained for that long.

    It should be noted that for real electricity enduring a lightning strike usually doesn't require durability equal to the lightnings full energy.
    Current isn't referred to as "A" but as "I" as per Ohm's Law. And I think the grammar flows better this way
    can i ask something here?
    Could you take a look at this
    Hello, could you check this out please?
    Hello can u pls help evaluating this thread. Thank You
    Hi, I heard you like downgrade threads

    Can you evaluate this CRT please? Don't want the pages to flood up and it's a very important one for Bleach's hax

    i can you help evaluate this CRT, please 🙏
    Can you comment here when u got time?
    Hi, do I have perms to keep this up?
    Hey Qawsedf. If it is not a bother would I request your wisdom on this CRT particularly about Low 1-A and 1-A Standards as I'm not fully sure
    what disqualifies 1-A into low 1-A

    thanks in advance
    TheGreatJedi13
    TheGreatJedi13
    TheGreatJedi13
    The Thread currently has 2 Admin vote and 1 Thread mod Vote.
    Your knowledge in 1-A and low 1-A would be greatly appreciated whether or not this CRT gets approved
    Thanks in advance
    Could I please have your input on this? It has 7 agrees, 1 staff agreement, and all the controversial points have been sanded down. Just need an admin to sign off on it since it deals with tier 2.

    Half_Shiny
    Half_Shiny
    bump

    I would like to move on from this thread please. If there is anything I can do to help just say the word.
    Staff input needed for CRT that is a barren wasteland for over a week. Supporters and other members have unanimously agreed, so just need the staff left.
    Hello, can you look over this CRT?

    To summarize: The MC has an ability called "Booster" which greatly enhances his speed. The illustrator made a comment saying he believe it is 5x increase but he also says the author might believe it is higher. There used to be a calc where it "kinda" found that booster gave 7.7x enhancement through scaling above another ability's speed increase, however, that feat has been taken down. The CRT is trying to just give the ability a permanent 5x multiplier through the illustrator's comments showing no story contradictions.
    Excuse me. Please evaluate my thread below. The summary for this thread: I basically propose a downgrade for High 1-B Blue Archive for many issues.

    In short, the downgrade shows that the setting’s multidimensionality never qualifies as true Higher Dimensions: it isn’t infinitely above lower layers, its scope is limited, and the narrative frames it as parallel universes that haven’t even fully materialized. The Ark of Atrahasis’ barrier does not contain any High 1-B structure; it merely uses machinery that taps only partially into external Infinite Dimensions, and its destruction fails to affect even a full planet. The False Sanctums’ energy also cannot be High 1-B, as it is limited, numerically calculable, and even projected to be destroyed within two weeks. Consequently, the feats of Aris, the Ark, and Utnapishtim’s Ship align far more with Quantum and Dimensional Manipulation, and under superposition fit neatly into NEP Nature 3 rather than High 1-B. Altogether, both the AP and cosmology ratings for High 1-B fall apart due to overwhelming internal inconsistencies.

    Thank you in advance.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top