1-A anti-feat?

[IDK3465]

I have a simple question:
Is a Low 1-A or lower character going into a 1-A's realm still an anti-feat for 1-A if it's explained and shown that everything that goes on in the lower world is a direct result of the 1-A character's actions?
Like, let's say the 1-A character views the universe as a fictional DnD campaign, but they accidentally knock a character off the board, sending them into the real world as a direct result. The lower character didn't technically do this on their own, but only through the unintentional aid of the 1-A game master, so does it still count by our qualitative empowerment clause, even if it's not a direct transfer of power?

 

[Comiphorous]

technically what you described would be the non 1-A appealing to a 1-A to achieve that, even if it were unintentional on the 1-A's end. As far as i understand by the logic you gave that wouldn't be an Anti-feat.

 

[IDK3465]

technically what you described would be the non 1-A appealing to a 1-A to achieve that, even if it were unintentional on the 1-A's end. As far as i understand by the logic you gave that wouldn't be an Anti-feat.

huh, well, sick :]

 

[Shar122]

Eh, no not an anti feat. Even it's untended, they are still helped by a qualitative superior source.

 

[JimedBro2020]

The source was from the 1-A, right? It shouldn't be an antifeat since it came from above and not below