- 312
- 117
Has nigh omnipotent characters been beaten by something/someone below its tier?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
A High 1-A/Nigh Omnipotent character can it be beaten by below its level?
- Thread starter Kerwin0831
- Start date
- 312
- 117
- Thread starter
- #4
What do you mean by that? High 1-A characters are supposedly the omnipotent of their verse, if there were no omnipotent character existing in its verse, so it is logical to say that High 1-A characters are nigh omnipotentProspectX said:
- 312
- 117
- Thread starter
- #5
Yeah figured much, I was just clarifying. Thank you.Edwardtruong2006 said:
- 1,096
- 94
You can't prove the existence of a Omnipotent from a rational or illogical perspective, because they already transcend and are far beyond such mortal things as perspective.
However, There can be two High 1-A's in a Verse, and it's irrelevance whether they are related or not, because you can't possibly comprehend the meaning of that; the nameless mist and the unnamed darkness.
Nigh-Omnipotence or Nigh-Omniscience have no significance at all, because it's unnecessary and does not fit in relation to the very definition of Omnipotence. A entity who is unlimited to the concept of power and regardless of hiearchy.
You can't be almost absolute, within figural context this "almost" is subjective, and does not For the reason, trying to reach True infinity will only result in going in circles.
However, There can be two High 1-A's in a Verse, and it's irrelevance whether they are related or not, because you can't possibly comprehend the meaning of that; the nameless mist and the unnamed darkness.
Nigh-Omnipotence or Nigh-Omniscience have no significance at all, because it's unnecessary and does not fit in relation to the very definition of Omnipotence. A entity who is unlimited to the concept of power and regardless of hiearchy.
You can't be almost absolute, within figural context this "almost" is subjective, and does not For the reason, trying to reach True infinity will only result in going in circles.
- 312
- 117
- Thread starter
- #7
True infinity/questionable omnipotent/tier 0 characters are at the top of their own verse while infinitely above any outerversal characters in their verse, they have no limitations, nothing and nobody as their equal.
Nigh omnipotent/high 1-A characters are called like that because there is already an questionable omnipotent character in their verse. They are called "NIGH" omnipotent because they are near omnipotent, second to the questionable omnipotent character of their verse.
Nigh omnipotent/high 1-A characters are called like that because there is already an questionable omnipotent character in their verse. They are called "NIGH" omnipotent because they are near omnipotent, second to the questionable omnipotent character of their verse.
- 1,096
- 94
No, you dont get it.
The same issue came up with a thread for the "invulnerability", subjecting invulnerability only to the absolute for derail it's meaning.
Something invulnerable, receives no physical damage to a certain type of attack. "Nigh-invulnerability" is utterly nonsensical, "nigh" has always been but a fanmade word of use.
Again, a Boundless, is something that no one should attempt to define. Even "nothing" is but a mortal perspective. A boundless only equal is itself, and yet not itself. For they are boundlessly above All, even itself.
The same issue came up with a thread for the "invulnerability", subjecting invulnerability only to the absolute for derail it's meaning.
Something invulnerable, receives no physical damage to a certain type of attack. "Nigh-invulnerability" is utterly nonsensical, "nigh" has always been but a fanmade word of use.
Again, a Boundless, is something that no one should attempt to define. Even "nothing" is but a mortal perspective. A boundless only equal is itself, and yet not itself. For they are boundlessly above All, even itself.
- 312
- 117
- Thread starter
- #9
There is no such thing as nigh invulnerability but nigh omnipotence has been used in many fictional verses so yeah it isn't used for fanmade. Nigh omnipotence is a thing, just like how Featherine was supposed to be the omnipotent of her verse, if the Creator weren't really there.
Nigh invulnerability and nigh omnipotence are very different in context. There's no such thing as "nigh invulnerable" because it's just two things, either you are invulnerable or not.
However, Nigh omnipotence is different, it is supposed to be omnipotent if the questionable omnipotent character of their verse wasn't really created by the writers/authors. A character can be called nigh omnipotent if it's only restriction and superior is the questionable omnipotent of their verse.
Nigh invulnerability and nigh omnipotence are very different in context. There's no such thing as "nigh invulnerable" because it's just two things, either you are invulnerable or not.
However, Nigh omnipotence is different, it is supposed to be omnipotent if the questionable omnipotent character of their verse wasn't really created by the writers/authors. A character can be called nigh omnipotent if it's only restriction and superior is the questionable omnipotent of their verse.
- 1,096
- 94
I am talking to wall?
You can't be almost absolute, within context this "almost" is subjective, and does not For the reason, trying to reach True infinity will only result in going in circles.
Nigh-Omnipotence is superfluous, because comparing yourself or somebody to a omnipotent is ridiculous and does not mean anything in literature. Again, you guys don't try to understand. The concepts of creation and destruction are but mortal perspectives, you task is to simply accept that this specimen do not create, the mortal can only describe what it have found. Because they are bound to the concepts of space-time.
Tell me, were the authors of the old testament "omnipotent"?
You can't be almost absolute, within context this "almost" is subjective, and does not For the reason, trying to reach True infinity will only result in going in circles.
Nigh-Omnipotence is superfluous, because comparing yourself or somebody to a omnipotent is ridiculous and does not mean anything in literature. Again, you guys don't try to understand. The concepts of creation and destruction are but mortal perspectives, you task is to simply accept that this specimen do not create, the mortal can only describe what it have found. Because they are bound to the concepts of space-time.
Tell me, were the authors of the old testament "omnipotent"?
Similar threads
