about conceptual manipulation

[hajime]

Can someone briefly summarize conceptual manipulation type 1 and 2? (how to get it ?)

 

[hajime]

I know it's written on the wiki, but I can't understand it because my English is not good enough.

 

[KLOL506]

Type 1 Concepts are not bound to reality. They are beyond it. Even if you destroy that aspect of reality, it won't mean jackshit to the actual concept itself.

Type 2 Concepts however, are bound to the aspect of reality they represent. If you wipe that aspect within reality out, the concept is ******.

 

[DontTalkDT]

And, importantly, both types are just for concepts which give things their properties. Not concepts in any of the many other senses of the term.

 

[hajime]

Type 1 Concepts are not bound to reality. They are beyond it. Even if you destroy that aspect of reality, it won't mean jackshit to the actual concept itself.

Type 2 Concepts however, are bound to the aspect of reality they represent. If you wipe that aspect within reality out, the concept is ******.

thanks for help but I have one more question, so destroying a concept does not directly give a type, as I understand it depends on the reality context. (I hope I said it right) Briefly, I would like to ask as an example, directly destroying the concept of knowledge does not give a certain type, does it?

 

[King_Gorilla4002-8922]

thanks for help but I have one more question, so destroying a concept does not directly give a type, as I understand it depends on the reality context. (I hope I said it right) Briefly, I would like to ask as an example, directly destroying the concept of knowledge does not give a certain type, does it?

It depends on how the concept of knowledge is applied within the verse

 

[hajime]

It depends on how the concept of knowledge is applied within the verse

okey ı get it thanks for help

 

[Vietthai96]

If the concept and conceptual abilities isn't elaborated in detail, so we default it to type 3. For example, character A released a conceptual attacks, or A destroy a fundamental abstract concept, if there is no more contexts regarding the nature of said concept or conceptual attacks, we default to type 3

 

[Delta333]

thanks for help but I have one more question, so destroying a concept does not directly give a type, as I understand it depends on the reality context. (I hope I said it right) Briefly, I would like to ask as an example, directly destroying the concept of knowledge does not give a certain type, does it?

Should be type 2, if the concept of knowledge is like the source of all knowledge in existence (and what gives the term "knowledge" a meaning), after such destruction no one within reality has knowledge at all.

 

[KLOL506]

thanks for help but I have one more question, so destroying a concept does not directly give a type, as I understand it depends on the reality context. (I hope I said it right) Briefly, I would like to ask as an example, directly destroying the concept of knowledge does not give a certain type, does it?

Depends on the connection of knowledge to reality. Context is key.

 

[hajime]

Depends on the connection of knowledge to reality. Context is key.

you have been very helpful thank you