• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Android 18 longevity

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
225
Reaction score
17
Why does she have longevity in her profile and not type-1 immortality? She doesn't age at all.
 
I don't remember about that, but Super 17 has Type 1 Immortality while the other androids have longevity or nothing.

I think we should set longevity or immortality for all the other androids and the arcosians, gods, angels, kais, cyborgs, lifeforms, dragons and beings like Janemba, Zangya, Bojack, Hirudegarn, Baby and Zen'o.
 
Dark649 said:
I don't remember about that, but Super 17 has Type 1 Immortality while the other androids have longevity or nothing.
I think we should set longevity or immortality for all the other androids and the arcosians, gods, angels, kais, dragons and beings like Bojack, Hirudegarn, Baby and Zen'o.
So you can confirm 18 is actually immortal and not just long-lived?
 
If you bring me the statements, i will tell this about the other users.
 
Type 1 immortality means that you do not age or wear down at all even after trillions of years. Extremely few characters should have the ability. However, regrettably lots of our profiles list it instead of longevity.
 
Antvasima said:
Type 1 immortality meams that you do not age or wear down at all even after trillions of years. Extremely few characters should have the ability. However, regrettably lots of our profiles list it instead of longevity.
I know! If toriyama hadn't stated what he stated in that interview, 18 should have had type 1 immortality though
 
in page 77 they specifically state that she has eternal life, which qualifies her for immortality type 1 Read manga Dragon Ball Chapter 349 online in high quality, also, before anyone tries to pull the headcanon that they still age, there is no signs of age on any of them.

toriyama has been noted as a very forgetful person, so he could have forgot this.
 
but can they die of natural causes such as diseases/etc.?


if that's so then its just longevity if they can still die to disease/etc.
 
that's headcanon, they never displayed the ability not to, but at the same time they have not, so thereby they have not displayed it, as such they cannot be immortal for now, goodbye.
 
Well, I suppose that they could get immortality type 1 then.
 
nah, they never displayed immunity to illness, but they have not displayed the ability to die from it either. so not yet. this can be closed really, unless you want to keep it open for the future.
 
I think that type 1 usually simply means that a character does not age at all.
 
"Since they're human-based, of course they can become even stronger if they train.

In the case of modified-human types like No. 17 and No. 18, since they're human-based they can become stronger if they train. By the way, though they don't need to eat, they do need to hydrate. Also, their cells deteriorate slowly, so they age slowly too."

-Akira Toriyama


I think longevity is the safest option here. I am fine with whatever is decided though.
 
Longevity it is then.
 
to not be affected by disease would require you to be in an artificial substrate, which means only robots. If you can repaire your telomeres an indefinite number of times and clean the "junk" in your cells you would be biologically immortal. Though not sure if Type 1 covers the BI and there are real life organisms that stop aging at a certain point
 
Well, since we seem to have decided to keep longevity intead of immortality, should we close this thread?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top