• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Anti-A.T Field, we need to talk about it. Conceptual and Ontological ability?

Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Hello. I have questions about the AT Field. I know that some staff members changed or allowed it to be used as a power nullification ability. But I think that if we consider it as it is, not only defensively, but also in its offensive version, the Anti-AT Field.

Metaphysically, it's the barrier between "Self" and "Other" (A is different from B). That is, it's a conceptual and ontological ability, and as such, it's not about killing the other, but about causing them to lose their individuality. The "Self" is the barrier that shapes identity, ignoring any resistance other than resistance to being conceptually affected. It's extremely effective if a character possesses individuality and a soul, since the AT Field is the barrier of the soul. By losing that barrier, you're manipulating the soul itself, and it affects quantum beings, since the LCL from which the Lilin (Humans) are made is a primordial quantum soup, erasing a physical and mental form.

What do you think? I believe the Anti-AT Field should be reviewed as a hax.
 
Back
Top