Soulking22334
He/Him- 219
- 42
From what I understand, you’re saying that you want evidence from the story to prove the existence of higher dimensions,That conclusion doesn’t necessarily follow. Saying that TWOTL and Soul Society would merge if their boundary disappeared only establishes that the boundary is what keeps them distinct. It does not identify the nature of that boundary
Geometric separation only requires an additional dimension if the two spaces are embedded within the same ambient space and occupy different positions along an extra axis. That’s exactly what the VSBW guideline describes: universes existing at different positions along an additional dimensional axis.
Bleach never explicitly states that the Human World and Soul Society occupy different positions along a fifth spatial dimension. Instead, the series consistently describes them as separate realms connected through intermediary spaces like the Dangai and Garganta. The fact that removing the boundary causes them to merge is equally consistent with the boundary being a metaphysical or topological separator rather than a geometric higher-dimensional one.
In other words, “they merge if the boundary is removed” proves that the boundary preserves their distinction. It doesn’t prove that the boundary is a higher-dimensional axis. That additional premise still requires evidence.
Likewise, saying they “share the same existential coordinates” is an assertion, not something established by the manga. If they truly shared the same coordinates in the geometric sense, that itself would need to be demonstrated from the source material.
Another logical issue is that the argument assumes that because geometric separation can require an extra dimension, all separation must be geometric. That’s a non sequitur. Fiction commonly separates universes through barriers, pocket dimensions, disconnected topology, or metaphysical laws without implying a higher-dimensional embedding. To conclude a 5D separator, you must first prove the separation is specifically geometric along an additional axis, not merely that a boundary exists.
and that since my points are missing scans from the story, they can be interpreted differently , so I need conclusive evidence, right?
So, either i have to provide evidence to support these points, or I have to present an indisputable point?