- 16,927
- 4,844
- Thread starter
- #201
With all due respect Ant, I’ve given responses to all of these on why they’re wrong takes and don’t make sense.I agree with the above sentiments.
Qawsed take is based on authors not adhering to extremely basic levels of consistency that basically flips common sense. An author writing up a fight scene or anything where characters would use their true capabilities is going to use their normal real speed, there’s no reason to think otherwise on that.
Bambus take is based on calc stacking not getting as much explicit evidence as multipliers, which I countered. Showing a character using their normal speed should be just as exact as getting a precise statement for a multiplier under the same rules.