Can this be a feat

[Berhann]

1-What tier would this being be or is it enough to be in a tier?

So this being existed even before truth and laws came into being. It existed before creation, it think s beyond thinking, it sees beyond seeing, it hears beyond hearing.
Transcends a being that created the universe and countless dimensions within the universe and be much closer to a concept than an actual sentient being(the being he transcended)
He is a conceptional being that embodies "Death"

2-does this mean that being transcends all existence, dimensions and concepts?
3-Does it make him outerversal?
4-or does this mean anything?
(Dimensionality and outerversal, hyperversal things confuse me alot)

 

[DaReaperMan]

Depends on what context the dimensions have, it'd be like 2-B to 1-B.

 

[Sus]

2-B with no further context

 

[Catzlaflame]

1-What tier would this being be or is it enough to be in a tier?

So this being existed even before truth and laws came into being.
It existed before creation, it think s beyond thinking, it sees beyond seeing, it hears beyond hearing.

Resistance to law manipulation, possible acasuality

It existed before creation,

With a little more context this could lead to acasuality

it think s beyond thinking, it sees beyond seeing, it hears beyond hearing.
Transcends a being that created the universe

upscales the verse creator

and countless dimensions within the universe and be much closer to a concept than an actual sentient being(the being he transcended)

This would be “likely 2-B”

He is a conceptional being that embodies "Death"

Abstract existence

2-does this mean that being transcends all existence, dimensions and concepts

That’s not possible to begin with, it’s a no limits fallacy

3-Does it make him outerversal?

Definitely not

4-or does this mean anything?
(Dimensionality and outerversal, hyperversal things confuse me alot)

2-B

 

[Berhann]

Resistance to law manipulation, possible acasuality

With a little more context this could lead to acasuality

upscales the verse creator


This would be “likely 2-B”

Abstract existence

That’s not possible to begin with, it’s a no limits fallacy

Definitely not

2-B

Thanks for explaining!

Resistance to law manipulation, possible acasuality

Btw what type acasuality would it be if it is?

 

[Catzlaflame]

Btw what type acasuality would it be if it is?

Type 4