• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Dark Tower: New Profiles

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes. Further explanation would be appreciated. 🙏
The reason is that all these beings are interconnected, and the narrative consistently adheres to the statement in question. Gan’s body was wounded and healed instantly, and it was then stated that he possesses infinite regeneration. Bessa, being a goddess created from Gan’s essence and explicitly stated to share the same attributes (such as maintaining the cohesion of existence), possesses the same ability. The same applies to Maerlyn as well, since he was created in the same archetypal sea as Gan and is considered his brother. Sufficient information is available on the profile. Pennywise’s regeneration is well-known; just as a reminder, he regenerated after being struck by the Losers’ Club, who were empowered by Gan, and returned after a 27-year slumber. (Don’t assume he needed 27 years to regenerate — the 27-year cycle is symbolic.) Maturin is Pennywise’s counterpart and exists within the same ontology with similar attributes. Necessary details are available in the profile. The Guardians follow the same logic. Honestly, Cthun would need a major revision, so I’m excluding him for now.
 
Was Gan accepted being 0? If so, probably should put a link in the Revision Comment of the CRT. To prevent confusion
 
Why are Gan and the Dark Tower both rated as Tier 0? From what I gathered, only High 1-A was accepted, not even High 1-A+ iirc. Hell, even the sandboxes on the CRT has High 1-A only, not tier 0. Even the verse page has changed. What is the reason for that?
 
well if you look at the profile history you can see that the OP is the one who did it
...Which is what they said? That's why they said "let's wait for the OP to explain"?

Even if the OP is the one who did it, if the changes weren't accepted or noted anywhere, it's still vandalism.
 
this has to be some misunderstanding 🗿
OP said he wont be around for much longer and just updated the profiles
 
Last edited:
Im just genuinely confused if he wa accepted being 0. Cus I know the CRT was about the Dark Tower characters being High 1-A. But Idk about 0.

Or even the Meta-Meta Extension Hierarchies
 
I personally think the Meta-Meta hierarchy is fine, as it showcases actual difference within the Tier. But thats probably Just me

No clue what the "Infinite" is there for tho.


Is it like "Infinite Layers into Meta-Meta-Meta Qualitative Superiority"? If so, and if that is indeed accepted, then it should've been that.
 
@SweetDao
Ah, I was just joking. After setting Gan to Tier 0 yesterday, I went to sleep (I was actually planning to lower it back down the next day anyway), and to be honest, I just wanted to stir things up a bit. Anyway, I just woke up and it seems like most people want to have me executed. 🤧 I’m reverting it now. I sincerely apologize to everyone who was upset by this, but come on — it wasn’t going to stay at Tier 0 forever, someone was bound to notice eventually. 🙏🏼
(I hope my account doesn't get terminated...) I really didn't have any bad intentions, I was going to fix it when I woke up anyway.
 
@SweetDao
Ah, I was just joking. After setting Gan to Tier 0 yesterday, I went to sleep (I was actually planning to lower it back down the next day anyway), and to be honest, I just wanted to stir things up a bit. Anyway, I just woke up and it seems like most people want to have me executed. 🤧 I’m reverting it now. I sincerely apologize to everyone who was upset by this, but come on — it wasn’t going to stay at Tier 0 forever, someone was bound to notice eventually. 🙏🏼
(I hope my account doesn't get terminated...) I really didn't have any bad intentions, I was going to fix it when I woke up anyway.
70ynhh.jpg
 
@SweetDao
Ah, I was just joking. After setting Gan to Tier 0 yesterday, I went to sleep (I was actually planning to lower it back down the next day anyway), and to be honest, I just wanted to stir things up a bit. Anyway, I just woke up and it seems like most people want to have me executed. 🤧 I’m reverting it now. I sincerely apologize to everyone who was upset by this, but come on — it wasn’t going to stay at Tier 0 forever, someone was bound to notice eventually. 🙏🏼
(I hope my account doesn't get terminated...) I really didn't have any bad intentions, I was going to fix it when I woke up anyway.
You know you can just say it was a mistake and that you'll fix it. That way what you say doesn't sound so condescending.

Just a tip.
 
You know you can just say it was a mistake and that you'll fix it. That way what you say doesn't sound so condescending.

Just a tip.
You're right (even if not necessarily about the condescending part), but even though I could have said what you suggested, I didn’t—because that would have been lying.
 
"Infinite regeneration" does not seem to be a remotely good justification for placing it at High-Godly. The nature and scale of that regeneration is the basis for its rating, so that likely needs to be corrected. 🙏
 
"Infinite regeneration" does not seem to be a remotely good justification for placing it at High-Godly. The nature and scale of that regeneration is the basis for its rating, so that likely needs to be corrected. 🙏
Actually, the previous Pennywise profile had a regeneration feature that I mentioned. I thought it wouldn't be a problem if I did the same.
 
Gan's profile is now as it should be. I already fixed it.
Not accurately:

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Gan?diff=9051074&oldid=9051066

Look, I and Butler have gone out of our way to attempt to help you out with the application of this revision, but your "gratitude" has so far been to repeatedly willfully completely mess up the formatting and structure of the pages to leave it for us to clean up after you, to repeatedly ignore staff instructions regarding this and your header image formatting, and to add unaccepted and illogically supported revisions. 🙏
 
Actually, the previous Pennywise profile had a regeneration feature that I mentioned. I thought it wouldn't be a problem if I did the same.
Okay, but we need to determine the true Regeneration statistics for all of the highest tier Dark Tower pages, and you or others need to carefully read our definitions in that page and explain your reasoning for their suggested regeneration levels afterwards. 🙏
 
It’s not deliberate although it wasn’t funny either.
How is it not deliberate? Making one mistakes is fine but multiple pages and even the verse pages were updated to explain that Gan was Tier 0, that some characters were High 1-A+ etc etc. He even admitted it himself.
 
How is it not deliberate? Making one mistakes is fine but multiple pages and even the verse pages where updated to explain that Gan was Tier 0, that some characters where High 1-A+ etc etc. He event admitted it himself.
Yeah, I didn't get around to checking the other pages since I was notified in Discord about this. So that was an overlook in my part, but that is deliberate although playing the ignorant card as he did isn't helping his case.
 
Last edited:
@VeryGoofyToddler2 @SweetDao @Antvasima @Apotheosis69
(I admit I'm a bit of a weird person. I think I'm great at getting into trouble out of nowhere.)

I fully understand the mistake I made and the disturbance it caused, and I sincerely apologize. I now realize the seriousness of the situation and understand that my actions could have harmed the integrity and proper functioning of the community. At first, I approached the situation poorly, which only made things worse. I had no intention to mislead, troll, or disrespect anyone, but regardless of my intentions, the outcome was negative—and I take full responsibility for that. I now understand that I need to be more careful, respectful, and responsible toward the community and its moderators. I promise to act with that awareness in all my future contributions. Again, I deeply apologize, and I hope I’ll be given the chance to make up for my mistake.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top