- 177,271
- 90,148
Yes. Further explanation would be appreciated.i still don't understand why that is high godly regeneration
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. Further explanation would be appreciated.i still don't understand why that is high godly regeneration
The reason is that all these beings are interconnected, and the narrative consistently adheres to the statement in question. Gan’s body was wounded and healed instantly, and it was then stated that he possesses infinite regeneration. Bessa, being a goddess created from Gan’s essence and explicitly stated to share the same attributes (such as maintaining the cohesion of existence), possesses the same ability. The same applies to Maerlyn as well, since he was created in the same archetypal sea as Gan and is considered his brother. Sufficient information is available on the profile. Pennywise’s regeneration is well-known; just as a reminder, he regenerated after being struck by the Losers’ Club, who were empowered by Gan, and returned after a 27-year slumber. (Don’t assume he needed 27 years to regenerate — the 27-year cycle is symbolic.) Maturin is Pennywise’s counterpart and exists within the same ontology with similar attributes. Necessary details are available in the profile. The Guardians follow the same logic. Honestly, Cthun would need a major revision, so I’m excluding him for now.Yes. Further explanation would be appreciated.![]()
He was not. It's High 1-A for him iirc.Was Gan accepted being 0? If so, probably should put a link in the Revision Comment of the CRT. To prevent confusion
What are you talking about?Was Gan accepted being 0? If so, probably should put a link in the Revision Comment of the CRT. To prevent confusion
Actually yeah, why did you edit Gan page and the page of the verse to add some stuff that weren't accepted? Gan wasn't accepted as 0 nor the verse.What are you talking about?
You were saying…He was not. It's High 1-A for him iirc.
That it seems like vandalism but I guess we can wait for OP to explain?You were saying…
...Which is what they said? That's why they said "let's wait for the OP to explain"?well if you look at the profile history you can see that the OP is the one who did it
nvm I thought what Dao was saying was that someone else came and vandalized it....Which is what they said? That's why they said "let's wait for the OP to explain"?
Even if the OP is the one who did it, if the changes weren't accepted or noted anywhere, it's still vandalism.
There are a lot more profiles, like the dark tower verse page and such, maybe you could link them tooReported him
@SweetDao
Ah, I was just joking. After setting Gan to Tier 0 yesterday, I went to sleep (I was actually planning to lower it back down the next day anyway), and to be honest, I just wanted to stir things up a bit. Anyway, I just woke up and it seems like most people want to have me executed.I’m reverting it now. I sincerely apologize to everyone who was upset by this, but come on — it wasn’t going to stay at Tier 0 forever, someone was bound to notice eventually.
(I hope my account doesn't get terminated...) I really didn't have any bad intentions, I was going to fix it when I woke up anyway.
You know you can just say it was a mistake and that you'll fix it. That way what you say doesn't sound so condescending.@SweetDao
Ah, I was just joking. After setting Gan to Tier 0 yesterday, I went to sleep (I was actually planning to lower it back down the next day anyway), and to be honest, I just wanted to stir things up a bit. Anyway, I just woke up and it seems like most people want to have me executed.I’m reverting it now. I sincerely apologize to everyone who was upset by this, but come on — it wasn’t going to stay at Tier 0 forever, someone was bound to notice eventually.
(I hope my account doesn't get terminated...) I really didn't have any bad intentions, I was going to fix it when I woke up anyway.
You're right (even if not necessarily about the condescending part), but even though I could have said what you suggested, I didn’t—because that would have been lying.You know you can just say it was a mistake and that you'll fix it. That way what you say doesn't sound so condescending.
Just a tip.
My brother waited for a message like this throughout the history of vs battles to share this image.
...absolutely right.This guy….
If you are deliberately adding unaccepted Tier 0, that is a bannable offence....absolutely right.
Actually, the previous Pennywise profile had a regeneration feature that I mentioned. I thought it wouldn't be a problem if I did the same."Infinite regeneration" does not seem to be a remotely good justification for placing it at High-Godly. The nature and scale of that regeneration is the basis for its rating, so that likely needs to be corrected.![]()
Gan's profile is now as it should be. I already fixed it.If you are deliberately adding unaccepted Tier 0, that is a bannable offence.![]()
It’s not deliberate although it wasn’t funny either.If you are deliberately adding unaccepted Tier 0, that is a bannable offence.![]()
Not accurately:Gan's profile is now as it should be. I already fixed it.
Okay, but we need to determine the true Regeneration statistics for all of the highest tier Dark Tower pages, and you or others need to carefully read our definitions in that page and explain your reasoning for their suggested regeneration levels afterwards.Actually, the previous Pennywise profile had a regeneration feature that I mentioned. I thought it wouldn't be a problem if I did the same.
How is it not deliberate? Making one mistakes is fine but multiple pages and even the verse pages were updated to explain that Gan was Tier 0, that some characters were High 1-A+ etc etc. He even admitted it himself.It’s not deliberate although it wasn’t funny either.
Yeah, I didn't get around to checking the other pages since I was notified in Discord about this. So that was an overlook in my part, but that is deliberate although playing the ignorant card as he did isn't helping his case.How is it not deliberate? Making one mistakes is fine but multiple pages and even the verse pages where updated to explain that Gan was Tier 0, that some characters where High 1-A+ etc etc. He event admitted it himself.