• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Dark Tower Cosmology Update

Status
Not open for further replies.
It was a joke, obviously.



And it is so because the amount (and quality) of my counter-arguments outweighs your arguments even in your CRT.


You are not a mod, so you are not in a position to demand from me to comment or not to comment on something.



In posts #75 and #76, I published new quotes that were not published anywhere before, even in my thread.



You made the cosmology blog, be ready to welcome comments about the cosmology, including the anti-feats. The posts #75 and #76 are not off-topic, so you need to respond to them.
Let someone examine the issue, then we can continue the discussion here. I could argue with you forever, but unlike you, I know it wouldn't lead to any conclusion.

(Note: Don't assume I have no answer just because I haven't responded. Our arguments are only making the staff's job more difficult.)
 
I was asked to take a look here again. I don't wish to look too deeply at the blog, since this is a series I'm reading on-and-off, and I get the sense a great deal is being spoiled for me. Nevertheless, I have stepped in to say, I believe the blog is fine for what it sets out to do. Furthermore, I do not think you, @Jockey-1337, should be debating the things you're debating in this thread. You obviously have permission to pursue such discussions, but not to circumvent the purpose of other threads to have them. This is derailment and is a rule violation, though as you did not, I think, consider it derailment before, you are not being warned-- just asked to stop.
 
I was asked to take a look here again. I don't wish to look too deeply at the blog, since this is a series I'm reading on-and-off, and I get the sense a great deal is being spoiled for me. Nevertheless, I have stepped in to say, I believe the blog is fine for what it sets out to do. Furthermore, I do not think you, @Jockey-1337, should be debating the things you're debating in this thread. You obviously have permission to pursue such discussions, but not to circumvent the purpose of other threads to have them. This is derailment and is a rule violation, though as you did not, I think, consider it derailment before, you are not being warned-- just asked to stop.
Thank you so much.
So, do you give your approval for me to reflect these changes on the wiki?
 
Yeah. You can go do that.
 
I have done so. 🙏
 
Or do you still plan to evaluate this thread, @Ultima_Reality ? Feel free to reopen this thread in that case. 🙏
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top