- 12,211
- 4,936
If ralsei is genuinely affected by it, then it's still a really dog shit law manipulation on the angel's end since Ralsei just bypasses the puzzle anyways.I think we're starting to reach with the “lots of assumptions” argument here, because it can be explained much more simply by saying that Ralsei is genuinely affected by it. Arguing otherwise doesn't really make sense either, especially when this entire segment is about him going against the rules as much as he can to reach Susie before talking to Flowery again.
In this chapter alone Flowery literally mentions how Ralsei enjoys serving humans, (which Ralsei did not deny iirc) and Ralsei has displayed his fear toward us, the player. Him listening to us isn't a dull interpretation of his character to say he listens to the deity he prays to who he knows is planning on causing a great tragedy toward him.He goes to great lengths, like skipping the spike puzzle and outright destroying the box puzzle. Something he wouldn't do if he's completely this dull character that can only “listen to us” or “abide by the rules”, one could just say that he's genuinely being affected by it.
Whether he is compelled to listen to us also isn't really relevant here, since we don't ask him to or not to do what he did.
Him turning himself into a bridge to bypass a puzzle is still breaking the rules of the puzzle. He is capable of breaking the rules in both scenes, so him being genuinely affected would mean said affect simply sucks.He does bypass the situation, but only on his own terms by turning himself into a bridge. At no point is he shown controlling what the puzzle itself does. He clearly wants to keep progressing, but simply can't do anything else under those conditions.
Double edged sword. You either give The Angel really sucky law manipulation since people can just use technicalities to bypass it or just say **** off to it's control, or it does genuinely function completely and isn't buns law manipulation, but we've just never seen it actually function as intended ever against other characters, since the scenes previously mentioned still happened (potential menu)
Both interpretations are also equally silly and aren't combat applicable, since it’s a one-off showing of an ability.
Last edited: