- 24,969
- 26,806
**** you for keeping Low 1-C tho
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
**** you for keeping Low 1-C tho
No. It's intentionally ambiguous.Anathor thing. The developers said that poc isn't really canon to the strory
check "21.6 min" point of the video
Devil May Cry: Peak of Combat| Closed Beta Reveal
Official website: http://dmcen.nebulajoy.com/landingpage.htmlHunters can now PRE-REGISTER using Email on the official website for the chance to participate i...www.youtube.com
No. It's intentionally ambiguous.
???? DMC is literally capcom. Would you rather listen to a dev's personal thoughts and opinions about canonicity or them stating an actual fact that the story was approved by capcom.yea its canon to capcom but they said its not canon to the main story and moat possibly an alternate timeline. Guess gotta wait till it releases to get cleared.
No. It's intentionally ambiguous.
? It's him saying the plot is approved by capcom.Is that the same video of the guy saying "I-uh... I don't think it's Canon"? Because lol if that's the one you are using
Oh yeah, we just decided to apply it along the other thread to not edit the profiles several times.Sorry for reviving a slightly old topic, but will this apply or is it for the future? I just want to understand the situation better.
It was glorious, revolutionary for the mobile market. One of its kind.Sorry for asking but does the game look gook or does it seem like it will suck?
The 9D stuff does.Is DMC 1-C because of this game?
big oofThe 9D stuff does.
So DMC should stay at Low 1-C after removing things
Seriously, this mobile game has a lot of stolen stuff on the back. Like, I even think it was over the top, it seems like the guys who made it were super fans who wanted the stuff super strong. It is funny.
Damn itttt. Game looked good as far as i remember. Not similar to the main games but much better than most games and in android it would be amazing. If they took out so much stuff it's not worth it. Why does everything good have to be destroyed.It was glorious, revolutionary for the mobile market. One of its kind.
And they flushed it down the toilet.
Why does everything good have to be destroyed.
To be completely fair, beforehand there was only 3 characters, the differences in moves and the like were just weapons, and the costumes were aesthetic only.Apparently they want to avoid bankruptcy... By creating a whole new gameplay system... And erasing a lot of weapons that people could pay for... And deleting skins...
Now there are only like 5 characters and I guess they think that shit will give them more money
Yes, this is a bit strange. Just because something isn't available anymore doesn't really mean it got "removed from canon" necessarily. It can, of course, be understood as that by certain people, but isn't really a rule that "isn't possible to access it officially anymore isn't 'canon'".Oh don't worry I've got some reliable contacts that tell me certain peeps will be using SMT Dante bodypillows as SSS grade copium like they did when canon Dante was tier 7 or when DmC reboot was first shown kek!
Being devilish facetious aside, I've always found PoC dubious at best so count me on the agree team that said does this change hypothetically affect over verses that get content/story yeeted?
E.g: important lore/feats isn't retconned narratively but straight up deleted literally.
In terms of powerscaling, I saw that very good things came from this game.But those aren't the same case as this DMC from the looks of it. So just to be sure, the lore wasn't really a part of the story, right? Just a lore drop that appeared in the game in a lore box. If that is the case, the story changing doesn't really seem to affect that part of the lore, it's just that you can't access it anymore because the game mode related to that got axed and they didn't think to add it in another place, but it could very well still just be part of the background setting.
If that is the case, I don't think it needs to be removed as long as it's not contradicted (If it gets contradicted, it's enough to think that it got retconned). It would be no different from them just closing the original game and releasing a new game with the same name.
It reminds me of Castlevania Grimoire of Souls almost being removed from everything. Now it's only on Apple Arcade (with the story and everything already finished). And the Akumajō Dracula: Kabuchi no Tsuisoukyoku novel that doesn't exist anywhere to get it, unless you bought the magazine at the time.With Digimon, for example, there are tons of content that were exclusive to magazines and websites that have since been removed but are still used from time to time and they even ask help from fans to archive that kind of information so they can keep that in mind in the future. There have been a ton of Digimon mobile games that have been removed from the stores, but their content is still used and very important to understand recent development even with 99% of the fans being completely unaware of it (The end of one of the most recent stories is dependent on a side-quest of a very obscure mobile game that got deactivated nearly a decade before).
this is a case where a retcon happens because we know the weapon master was a gameplay element in the story and in the new story he doesn't exist in the place where he should exist according to old story. thus a contradiction and a retconlike the Weapon Master. He gives info on Devil Arms and how they relate to their User, citing what is implied to be physical and spiritual strength necessary to wield such weapons.
In 2.0, he simply doesn’t exist. He’s not in the bar, he doesn’t have a cutscene, and his playable area is now just set dressing. Instead they fast tracked the weapon upgrade info into the Tutorial.
but loading screens arent the same (most of them at least). as they're completely unrelated to the story and should still apply to lore regardless of whether they're in the game or not. for example the star guardian event that happened in LoL a while ago. they had an entire VN in the client that had alot of lore stories etc. but when the event was over that was removed. does that mean that the all of the lore & the entire story of the VN got removed from canon? no because riot simply had to remove it to make room for other events & stuff. so unless they're directly contradicted or were stated the be retconned by devs. they should still apply.Same with the loading screens.
I bet Tony feels high RNI know you are mad about it but Kratos still loses \>:v/
Tbh using content from sources that haven't been officially released and localized globally always ends up being way too much troubled than its worth and is classic battle-boarding bait and VSBW brainrot.Snip
In complete fairness, 1.0 was the “official release.” It maintained its existence for a year and a half, debatably two (since 2021), got consistently updated (gained new missions, new modes, and even new Gacha Weapons and costumes). Hell, it was even stated by the TL’ers and Media heads 1.0 (the CN Version) would be directly made Global/carried over. There are a litany of articles we’ve found that supports this. From canoncity, to internal game lore, to design philosophy.There's a whole rule on not doing pages for stuff that isn't officially released, otherwise we'd have pages for Yandere Simulator on the site.
That's too much irony for my red blood.original PoC model apparently was not profitable enough.
oh for gods sake this againSevil, the issue is that’s not a RETCON. A retcon is material that is fully established (the 1.0 Beta is not the Official Release and thus was always liable to change/was a conceptual state of the game),
1.0 was not incomplete. it was officially released. it even had expansion packs afterOn June 11, 2021, "Devil May Cry - Battle of the Peak" was officially launched, and it has received the eager attention of tens of millions of players on the entire network, and the results achieved far exceeded expectations. However... the development of things caught us by surprise, a large number of players were lost in a short period of time, but it also pointed out the problem for us: for a long time, we spent a lot of energy on the restoration of battles and art vision However, more important issues were overlooked: the content of the main line is too short, the threshold for combat operations is too high, there are no new characters for a long time, and the dungeon gameplay is not rich enough...
So we took the criticisms of all players, regrouped and started again, creating version 2.0 of "Devil May Cry - Battle at the Peak"! 作者:鬼泣-巅峰之战
except for the fact that concept art doesn't appear in the form of a playable game title that was officially released to the public. it was an official version that got a huge gameplay update. some stuff is gonna be changed & thus retconned. but the old version was definitely not a "concept stage" thats not how it worksthat is then contradicted in later material (there is no contradiction here. It’s not like it’s DMC6 Retconning PoC, or PoC is Retconning DMC3. The game was simply fundamentally changed from the conceptual state it was in. They have redesigned it from the ground up. The Weapon Master simply never existed. Not he did, and then didn’t {like a Retcon}, he just never did {like thrown away Concept Art}.