Earth Destruction wrong Level

[Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan]

I'm late, but IIRC it was said the value for Earth was calculated "with a more accurate formula" than GBE.

 

[CNBA3]

I'm late, but IIRC it was said the value for Earth was calculated "with a more accurate formula" than GBE.

Yes, We settled this already, right now we are looking for that accurate formula to actually show the results of the higher level of AP for GBE of Earth. And DontTalk is said to have provided it

 

[CNBA3]

So I tried out reversing the equation to see what the constant is by 2.487e+32/2.24e+32/1=1.11026785714, and then 1.11026785714+5=6.11026785714, would this be right?

 

[CNBA3]

bump

 

[Qawsedf234]

It is for Earth. But what if the planet's crust is far thicker or thinner? What if it's core is made of a different material? There's to many other factors that makes it impossible to get the true number.

 

[CNBA3]

It is for Earth. But what if the planet's crust is far thicker or thinner? What if it's core is made of a different material? There's to many other factors that makes it impossible to get the true number.

I found this which talks about the Earth's density distribution http://www.typnet.net/Essays/EarthBind.htm

and to calculate the gravitational energy, I heard that I can do this with integrals on Mathematica

 

[Qawsedf234]

No like, the Earth stuff is 100% fine. It's just not transferable to other planetary calculations. Adding a 1.1x multiplier to GBE calcs just seems like a bad idea imo.