- 40,446
- 12,915
FTL Zelda (for realsies this time)
1c < feat < 2c
Before you say it, AoC Guardian lasers don't explode, they do burn, and they do reflect.
Scales to all playable characters (Champions + Link & Impa & Zelda)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How soIf we take AoC, then I'm pretty sure that Terako gameplay shows that the energy used for the beams isn't really light stuff.
The big Guardians do yeah, they don't quite count, but going by the link, it's talking about the scouts (the tiny guardian dudes you fight in trials of strength and sometimes in shrines). They have a different laserbeam iirc, if I'm understanding what's being said, it's the same exact type as the actual lightspeed beams shown in the speed of light shrine among others.I remember the guardian beam were rejected because they explode and in a cutscene one reflected off a wooden pot. So I don’t think this feat is legitimate.
Stop Cyber.....pralso we dont reject light/lasers for exploding anymore I thinkas much as I disagree with that notion
Except they aren't the same laser so that's not an actual argumentIf you block it with the pot lid they reflect. Also these should be the same laser. They come from the same technology, if one is completely unrealistic it should discredit the other one as well.
Their was a thread recently that made beams reflecting vastly more strict. Does the beam reflect in the exact way it should reflect off the surface it hit (I’m being serious our standards on Light speed are that strict now).
Also how would the pot lid be a joke in any way, shape, or form. It’s a shield, and when the laser hits it, it reflects, that should discredit the laser.
Before you say it, AoC Guardian lasers don't explode, they do burn, and they do reflect.
Hmm, Idk about dat chief.looks at every laser shot in BOTW.
B̶e̶c̶a̶u̶s̶e̶ ̶i̶t̶'̶s̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶O̶C̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶s̶a̶y̶s̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶n̶w̶o̶r̶d̶Hmm, Idk about dat chief.
In all seriousness why isn't this in a wiki blog?
No, if you qualify for a select few and have no anti-feats you are good to go.It’s not a nitpick. To be light speed you can’t contradict a single rule on our light speed page. It’s like black holes, you have to follow every rule to the letter.
Didn't passThat thread (I’m referring to the reflection comment, typing this took longer than I thought) more just seemed to die down, but if I missed something you would definitely know.
It being a reference does discredit it. He is still reflecting the laser with wood. Even if the reason he is doing so is a joke, he’s still doing it.
It’s not a nitpick. To be light speed you can’t contradict a single rule on our light speed page. It’s like black holes, you have to follow every rule to the letter.
The statement is irrelevant if the laser properties are contradicted.
Uh, news flash, something being stated to be the speed of light is in fact, reason to believe, it is indeed, the speed of light unless otherwise proven.Last I checked just being called light speed has never been any justification for actually being light speed. You need more supporting evidence, and the support is contradicted because the beam has a massive glaring problem.
Priamary source and word of god is enough for Light speed, no matter what nature.Last I checked just being called light speed has never been any justification for actually being light speed. You need more supporting evidence, and the support is contradicted because the beam has a massive glaring problem.
I’ll need to search YouTube for it, because I don’t own AoC so I can’t just go record it quickly. I‘ll try to find it, but I have to work tomorrow very early so it will take a bit. And before you say “why didn’t you have this footage on hand” I wasn’t even thinking about LoZ’s speed until I saw this thread.Also can I see the footage for it reflecting off of wood
*massive glaring problembecause the beam has a massive glaring problem.
lightning shit.