• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

High Complex Multiversal vs. Low Hyperversal

Messages
120
Reaction score
106
So...10+1 or 11-D cosmology vs. 11+1 or 12-D. These are very closely related. In fact our theoretical multiverse is 11-dimensional, but is it 10+1 or 11+1? Then again time is usually the 4th dimension for some reason). In that case isn't Low Hyperversal to High Complex Multiversal like Universal+ is to High Universal? I don't know a single verse with a 12-dimensional cosmology (not saying it doesn't exist.). And...if there is a common 11-D multiverse, anything that vastly exceeds it could just be an external abstraction and not necessarily 12-D. Why is there a distinction between the two? Shouldn't it just be 1-B starts with any cosmology with a dimensionality greater than 11? Why give 12-D its own sub-tier...12-D (without any specified added temporal dimension) is loosely related to an 11+1-D multiverse if not equally the same in basic geometric terms.
 
It's just semantics. 12-D is greater than the proposed measurement of our theoretical multiverse according to modern String Theory, so we rank it Low 1-B to start off verses that are "likely larger than our own". I already mentioned on the Hyperverse page that any 12-D structure is loosely related to an 11-D one (since 11+1 is a possibility I've come across) hence why it's "Low 1-B".
 
So Low 1-B is just for if we just so happen to come across a 12-dimensional multiverse? The most common is 11 and anything else is composite in most cases. Then again, western works throw around a lot of bizzare numbers like 16-dimensional right?
 
I've read Russian and Chinese novels with 500-dimensional multiverses before. It's just an author trying to be artistic, though it can come off a bit forced.
 
Yes, if we come across a 12 Dimensional multiverse it is Low 1-B.

16 Dimensions will be 1-B

and Hilbert Space is High 1-B
 
If I recall correctly our multiverse is 10+ 1, I could be wrong though as String Theory varies and is interpreted many different ways compared to the more simplistic M-Theory.
 
So...an authors makes an 11-D multiverse but it's 11+1, it would be 12-D? That would just mean they aren't sure if our own multiverse is 10 + 1 or 11 +1.
 
Forget about temporal dimensions. They mess with our system which is strictly geometrical. We only consult m-theory, string theory, and hilbert space to define theoretical multiverse measurements.
 
It's probably better to forget the temporal dimensions.

Edit: Nevermind i got ninja'd by Venom.
 
Since Peach-Chan got her answers, i guess this Thread should be closed unless There are others questions to ask for.
 
Back
Top