• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Human Statistics Scaling Standards in Fiction (Staff Only)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Been so busy, I forgot about this.

I think everything has been said on how we should treat "humans" in the cases when they start displaying things beyond the normal. Doesn't seem like it would require a page and I don't think a note would fit on any of our existing pages, so overall i think this is concluded? It's pretty much down to case by case and what proof is there that "normal human" characters can scale higher (feats, supernatural energy, statements) are all valid so long as it's explained in verse. Like what we do with most characters, we'd evaluate them and see if it fits the narrative and consistency of the verse.

Does anyone have anything to add or can I go ahead and close this?
 
I presume you'll try to take the overall conclusions drawn here to re-evaluate some cases of this? If so, yeah, there's nothing more to add here.
 
I presume you'll try to take the overall conclusions drawn here to re-evaluate some cases of this? If so, yeah, there's nothing more to add here.
Yeah, I know a few verses I plan on looking over given the conclusions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top