• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Kienzan (気円斬), Krillin’s signature technique, is consistently depicted as an energy-based attack capable of instantly cutting through its target, being described as able to cut through anything and everything”, independent of the user’s Battle Power. Unlike conventional energy attacks that rely on power differences, Kienzan functions through its extreme energy-slicing properties that ignore the target’s physical durability.

In its various appearances, Kienzan has been shown to injure or threaten characters statistically far superior to Krillin. This establishes that the effectiveness of the Kienzan is not determined by the user’s AP, but rather by the inherent cutting mechanism of the technique itself.

It is often questioned why, in certain cases like Cell and Jiren, the target was not sliced cleanly in half despite being hit or nearly hit by the Kienzan. However, this does not automatically negate the technique’s Durability Negation property.

In Cell's case, Kienzan should still have been able to effectively cut through his body, but it shattered upon entering without any explanation. The subsequent dialogue, instead of saying Cell was "too durable," asserts that Kienzan can cut through opponents far stronger than its wielder, with Krillin explicitly citing Frieza as an example. However, logically, if a sword or other sharp object can't affect something, it can't penetrate it, and it requires extra power. If it didn't work on Cell, Kienzan wouldn't have moved forward.

The same goes for Cell Max. However, we accept that Kienzan is capable of affecting Cell Max, as I explained in the OP notes, and through this, Krillin also receives a "far higher" rating through Kienzan in his profile (DBS: Super Hero key).

Not only in the case of Cell in DBZ: Tree of Might, it is mentioned that the opponent deflects the Kienzan by using the momentum generated from "spinning his body at high speed", but in the same footage it is also mentioned that the Kienzan can cut through anything, which makes it clear that this is another conclusion or "what if" if the Kienzan hits his body. In the manga, almost the same thing happens where the opponent is able to deflect the Kienzan by using the momentum by "rotating his body at high speed" but the other end result if the opponent does not do that is shown where it can still injure him even though they are much stronger.

Meanwhile, Jiren’s case is different in context. Jiren is explicitly shown reacting seriously to the Kienzan, attempting to read its movement and exploit a weakness or momentum point within the technique. This indicates that the attack is considered dangerous even by someone operating on a far higher power level. The absence of Jiren being cleanly bisected is not evidence that the Kienzan failed to ignore his durability; rather, it suggests that the attack did not strike him in an optimal manner. On the other hand, we have already seen Goku destroy Krillin’s Kienzan with his energy blast, even though Kienzan could penetrate Cell Max's energy attack, which implies that he was also targeting a weak point of the disc similar to what Jiren did. Additionally, Kienzan does have weaknesses such as when it is launched from a great distance or used without proper strategy which is why it is often portrayed as a surprise attack, either relying on its attack speed or because the disc eventually slows down.

The most consistent interpretation is that Jiren did not “tank” the Kienzan through sheer durability, but instead read its timing and looked for openings to avoid it or to secure momentum. Avoiding the Kienzan is far more rational than attempting to tank an energy slice that mechanically does not rely on Battle Power differences.

The most illogical statement being treated as mere Attack Potency is

This is how Ki, as a UES, functions. When the Kienzan is used, there is never a moment where the opponent or anyone else senses a power increase in Krillin himself, unlike what happens when techniques such as the Kamehameha or the Special Beam Cannon are used.

Additionally, there are several statements that are stated repeatedly that should not be flowery language, such as the most striking one that I have bolded, which distinguishes it as a property in the DB world:

Where some of these statements are not owned by sword users or anyone who has the same properties as Kiezan as something used to cut in the DB world which makes it clear that Kienzan is not something to be taken lightly. If they were the same thing Kienzan should not need to be made something like this or at least assume all properties in the DB world are the same as Kienzan but in fact it is not like that.

Justification:


Note:


Additional Evidence:


Some of the accepted profiles have similar properties as Kienzan:

Agree: @CelestialVortex01 @LuffyRuffy46307 @JustANormalPerson01 @Nullflowerblush @Ednaxel2 @Killerdrone123 @LordGriffin1000 @Vietthai96 @UnoRebaixadO @Dereck03 @Gamin_Yoon23 @Greatsage13th @Apex_Predator_GX @DivineAura44 @Muteki616 @Godernet (Likely/Possibly) @LephyrTheRevanchist

Don't agree
: @Eden_Warlock99 @Kachon123 @Monkey_Dunno @DontTalkDT @DarkDragonMedeus @AmonInChains @Damage3245
Bump please
 
Kienzan (気円斬), Krillin’s signature technique, is consistently depicted as an energy-based attack capable of instantly cutting through its target, being described as able to cut through anything and everything”, independent of the user’s Battle Power. Unlike conventional energy attacks that rely on power differences, Kienzan functions through its extreme energy-slicing properties that ignore the target’s physical durability.

In its various appearances, Kienzan has been shown to injure or threaten characters statistically far superior to Krillin. This establishes that the effectiveness of the Kienzan is not determined by the user’s AP, but rather by the inherent cutting mechanism of the technique itself.

It is often questioned why, in certain cases like Cell and Jiren, the target was not sliced cleanly in half despite being hit or nearly hit by the Kienzan. However, this does not automatically negate the technique’s Durability Negation property.

In Cell's case, Kienzan should still have been able to effectively cut through his body, but it shattered upon entering without any explanation. The subsequent dialogue, instead of saying Cell was "too durable," asserts that Kienzan can cut through opponents far stronger than its wielder, with Krillin explicitly citing Frieza as an example. However, logically, if a sword or other sharp object can't affect something, it can't penetrate it, and it requires extra power. If it didn't work on Cell, Kienzan wouldn't have moved forward.

The same goes for Cell Max. However, we accept that Kienzan is capable of affecting Cell Max, as I explained in the OP notes, and through this, Krillin also receives a "far higher" rating through Kienzan in his profile (DBS: Super Hero key).

Not only in the case of Cell in DBZ: Tree of Might, it is mentioned that the opponent deflects the Kienzan by using the momentum generated from "spinning his body at high speed", but in the same footage it is also mentioned that the Kienzan can cut through anything, which makes it clear that this is another conclusion or "what if" if the Kienzan hits his body. In the manga, almost the same thing happens where the opponent is able to deflect the Kienzan by using the momentum by "rotating his body at high speed" but the other end result if the opponent does not do that is shown where it can still injure him even though they are much stronger.

Meanwhile, Jiren’s case is different in context. Jiren is explicitly shown reacting seriously to the Kienzan, attempting to read its movement and exploit a weakness or momentum point within the technique. This indicates that the attack is considered dangerous even by someone operating on a far higher power level. The absence of Jiren being cleanly bisected is not evidence that the Kienzan failed to ignore his durability; rather, it suggests that the attack did not strike him in an optimal manner. On the other hand, we have already seen Goku destroy Krillin’s Kienzan with his energy blast, even though Kienzan could penetrate Cell Max's energy attack, which implies that he was also targeting a weak point of the disc similar to what Jiren did. Additionally, Kienzan does have weaknesses such as when it is launched from a great distance or used without proper strategy which is why it is often portrayed as a surprise attack, either relying on its attack speed or because the disc eventually slows down.

The most consistent interpretation is that Jiren did not “tank” the Kienzan through sheer durability, but instead read its timing and looked for openings to avoid it or to secure momentum. Avoiding the Kienzan is far more rational than attempting to tank an energy slice that mechanically does not rely on Battle Power differences.

The most illogical statement being treated as mere Attack Potency is

This is how Ki, as a UES, functions. When the Kienzan is used, there is never a moment where the opponent or anyone else senses a power increase in Krillin himself, unlike what happens when techniques such as the Kamehameha or the Special Beam Cannon are used.

Additionally, there are several statements that are stated repeatedly that should not be flowery language, such as the most striking one that I have bolded, which distinguishes it as a property in the DB world:

Where some of these statements are not owned by sword users or anyone who has the same properties as Kiezan as something used to cut in the DB world which makes it clear that Kienzan is not something to be taken lightly. If they were the same thing Kienzan should not need to be made something like this or at least assume all properties in the DB world are the same as Kienzan but in fact it is not like that.

Justification:


Note:


Additional Evidence:


Some of the accepted profiles have similar properties as Kienzan:

Agree: @CelestialVortex01 @LuffyRuffy46307 @JustANormalPerson01 @Nullflowerblush @Ednaxel2 @Killerdrone123 @LordGriffin1000 @Vietthai96 @UnoRebaixadO @Dereck03 @Gamin_Yoon23 @Greatsage13th @Apex_Predator_GX @DivineAura44 @Muteki616 @Godernet (Likely/Possibly) @LephyrTheRevanchist

Don't agree
: @Eden_Warlock99 @Kachon123 @Monkey_Dunno @DontTalkDT @DarkDragonMedeus @AmonInChains @Damage3245
Bump with the 1000th message
 
One needs to truly understand the OP, even in every scene it's still said to work on characters far stronger than the user, which Krillin reclaims, even though the Cell scene is never explained at all by the narrator/writer, but they instead mention things that should work on characters far stronger than the user.

Furthermore, the Kakarot Encyclopedia scan is also gold, he directly claims 3 statements from several different guides:
"unique property" (特性) of "cutting through anything, independent of Battle Power".
 
One needs to truly understand the OP, even in every scene it's still said to work on characters far stronger than the user, which Krillin reclaims, even though the Cell scene is never explained at all by the narrator/writer, but they instead mention things that should work on characters far stronger than the user.

Furthermore, the Kakarot Encyclopedia scan is also gold, he directly claims 3 statements from several different guides:
You know I agreed with the thread, right?
 
We only treat precision strikes or sharpness/penetration strikes as durability negation if it cuts things on an molecular/atomic level or smaller scale (All the way up to spatial level). I would agree with Kienzen having durability negation if there was proof if it cutting things on that level of precision. A very sharp buzzsaw, or the very tip of a sword are indeed very sharp to the point of being able to harm large sized characters with significantly higher durability ratings than the attacker, but not enough to be qualified as durability negation. Durability negation basically implies that it attacks and damages someone as if their durability stat is 0.
I'm fine with this argument, but going by the OP Krillin harmed Cell Max in every medium. So for him to do so in the Manga the Destruco Disk has to have Tier 2 AP, 4D hax, or Krillin himself has to be Tier 2.

So while I don't agree with the Kienzan being durability negating, he would need to have a Tier 2 upgrade to reflect that. We'll that pr we give all the manga people a "2-C with Kienzan" rating.
 
I'm fine with this argument, but going by the OP Krillin harmed Cell Max in every medium. So for him to do so in the Manga the Destruco Disk has to have Tier 2 AP, 4D hax, or Krillin himself has to be Tier 2.

So while I don't agree with the Kienzan being durability negating, he would need to have a Tier 2 upgrade to reflect that. We'll that pr we give all the manga people a "2-C with Kienzan" rating.
What about the statement that it's independent of the user's Battle Power?

Also, Kienzan was stated to be unrelated to it in the first place. Furthermore, Kienzan isn't a "charged attacks" technique like the Kamehameha and Special Beam Cannon or Galick Gun, which increase the user's Ki upon use. So giving it a "far higher" rating also doesn't make sense, since Ki is a UES.

Edit: Also, we have Piccolo who is supposed to be stronger than Krillin with his Potential Unleashed, and Gamma 2 who uses "charged attacks" and it doesn't hurt Cell Max at all, even Piccolo attacking his weak point doesn't do anything either. Because basically Kienzan has been stated many times to work on characters that are much stronger than its user.
 
Last edited:
What about the statement that it's independent of the user's Battle Power?
If it was independent of power then Cell would've been cut in half every time it was used on him.

Also, Kienzan was stated to be unrelated to it in the first place. Furthermore, Kienzan isn't a "Charged Attacks" technique like the Kamehameha and Special Beam Cannon or Galick Gun, which increase the user's Ki upon use. So giving it a "far higher" rating also doesn't make sense, since Ki is a UES
A Kienzan does not need to be charged to have a damage increase. A sword weighing 5 Kg being swung at 10 m/s will have the same kinetic energy as a 5 Kg ball being thrown at 10 m/s. But the surface area of the sword is much smaller, so that force is focused in a smaller area.

Like just doing napkin math, if Krillin made the Kienzan roughly as sharp as an surgical or aerospace grade scalpel he'd be able to harm people billions to trillions times stronger than himself while maintaining the same AP.
 
In my opinion, it makes absolutely no sense to consider the Kienzan a simple charged ki attack.

Since his introduction in the story, he has proven to be quite different from other ki-based attacks, in addition to the statement that he ignores power differences.
 
If it was independent of power then Cell would've been cut in half every time it was used on him.
The second scene Cell was never stated to have something like "too durable" so Kienzan doesn't work on him, and for Perfect Cell the writter/narrator still explicitly states they should work on stronger characters in later scenes.
A Kienzan does not need to be charged to have a damage increase. A sword weighing 5 Kg being swung at 10 m/s will have the same kinetic energy as a 5 Kg ball being thrown at 10 m/s. But the surface area of the sword is much smaller, so that force is focused in a smaller area.

Like just doing napkin math, if Krillin made the Kienzan roughly as sharp as an surgical or aerospace grade scalpel he'd be able to harm people billions to trillions times stronger than himself while maintaining the same AP.
Yet still, neither are described as having the ability to cut anything and everything, explicitly regardless of its durability. However, Kienzan's only weakness is its "slow movement" so it should require a boost to cut like how a sword works to focus on cutting the opponent.

Never has a sword for example, Yajirobe's sword, which was the "sharpness in the world"; Future Trunks's sword, which was created and further refined by the future's more advanced technology; or the Z-Sword, which is described as the heaviest and most powerful sword in the entire universe been stated to be capable of cutting through anything and everything, flowery or otherwise. Evidently, the Kienzan goes beyond simple sharpness.
 
The second scene Cell was never stated to have something like "too durable" so Kienzan doesn't work on him,
The Kienzan went down and then bounced up. A pure durability negating attack would just pierce through Cell completely.

Perfect Cell the writter/narrator still explicitly states they should work on stronger characters in later scenes.
This would juat mean that the gap between Cell and Krillin is greater than the gap between Krillin and Frieza.

Yet still, neither are described as having the ability to cut anything and everything, explicitly regardless of its durability
But it doesn't do that. We have multiple instances where it fills to cut things because they're strong.

entire universe been stated to be capable of cutting through anything and everything, flowery or otherwise. Evidently, the Kienzan goes beyond simple sharpness
I mean... no it doesn't? It just needs to be sharper than those weapons. If Krillin's Kiezan had a surface area of a square micrometer he would be able to damage characters 40 billion times stronger than himself as an example.

What the thread really has me convinced is that Manga Krillin needs a Tier 2 key more than anything.
 
Tier 2 AP mean Kienzan is dependent on power level which contradict its own statement, so i can't agree with that, what about Limited Durability Negation that Kienzan can neg durability up to a certain level?. Like it still damage Cell Max though
 
The second scene Cell was never stated to have something like "too durable" so Kienzan doesn't work on him, and for Perfect Cell the writter/narrator still explicitly states they should work on stronger characters in later scenes.

Yet still, neither are described as having the ability to cut anything and everything, explicitly regardless of its durability. However, Kienzan's only weakness is its "slow movement" so it should require a boost to cut like how a sword works to focus on cutting the opponent.

Never has a sword for example, Yajirobe's sword, which was the "sharpness in the world"; Future Trunks's sword, which was created and further refined by the future's more advanced technology; or the Z-Sword, which is described as the heaviest and most powerful sword in the entire universe been stated to be capable of cutting through anything and everything, flowery or otherwise. Evidently, the Kienzan goes beyond simple sharpness.
We've already given this a "far higher" rating, I think, but that doesn't make sense because of something about it being "independent of the user's battle power," as the technique is made from Ki, as UES is an internal source, unlike swords made from external materials. However, DB characters are supposed to empower their swords with their Ki to cut through much stronger opponents. And, it's never stated that Kienzan is the same or similar to other sword users.

Instead, it's described as a unique property within the DB world. Also, the gap between Krillin and Cell and the gap between Krillin and Frieza doesn't contradict the previous "independent of user's battle power" statement? Kienzan isn't something like the Damage Boost we receive here due to (charged attacks: Kamehameha, SBC, Galick Gun, etc.).
Tier 2 AP mean Kienzan is dependent on power level which contradict its own statement, so i can't agree with that, what about Limited Durability Negation that Kienzan can neg durability up to a certain level?. Like it still damage Cell Max though
As Vietthai said, it should be. Honestly, I don't know if we have a rule against using other characters' examples of character upgrades, but some of those characters on the wiki don't necessarily cut through anything.
 
Last edited:
Tier 2 AP mean Kienzan is dependent on power level which contradict its own statement, so i can't agree with that, what about Limited Durability Negation that Kienzan can neg durability up to a certain level?. Like it still damage Cell Max though
What you're suggesting is that every Kienzan user has a 2-C AP attack or 4D hax.

Additionally the Kienzan statements are already contradicted within the primary mediums where it fails to slice through people. In the anime canon Gohan aura outright stops two and then he shatters them with a power up.
 
Additionally the Kienzan statements are already contradicted within the primary mediums where it fails to slice through people. In the anime canon Gohan aura outright stops two and then he shatters them with a power up.
It was mentioned before that he held on the other side, not the part meant for cutting things, and then he exploded it. This is similar to how Jiren and Goku destroyed Kienzan by targeting the other side of the disc, but regardless, they were very focused on avoiding and dealing with Kienzan instead of just ignoring it.
 
What you're suggesting is that every Kienzan user has a 2-C AP attack or 4D hax.
No, i didn't suggest Kienzan have AP cause of its statement.

4D hax?


Additionally the Kienzan statements are already contradicted within the primary mediums where it fails to slice through people. In the anime canon Gohan aura outright stops two and then he shatters them with a power up.
I was talking about manga only
 
No, i didn't suggest Kienzan have AP cause of its statement.

4D hax?
The Kienzan for the manga is being argued as Durability Negation and the Anime as limited Durability Negation. Krillin in the former is still Tier 5, which would mean the Kienzan would have to have 4D hax afaik.
 
Hmm, 4D hax sound weird to me cause we don't applies dimensionality to hax anymore. But anyway, what do you think about my Limited Durability Negation suggestion?
 
From what I can tell Invulnerability and Durability Negation are considered two sides of the same coin. Presently we have a Staff CRT for Invulnerability that will split it into 'Type 1' and 'Type 2'. Where Type 2 is full-on Invulnerability and Type 1 is limited Invulnerability, only being invulnerable to attacks up to a certain level.

So I think for now Limited Durability Negation makes sense. And perhaps if the Invulnerability revision passes they could see about splitting Durability Negation into Type 1 and Type 2 then this can become Durability Negation (Type 1).
 
The Kienzan for the manga is being argued as Durability Negation and the Anime as limited Durability Negation. Krillin in the former is still Tier 5, which would mean the Kienzan would have to have 4D hax afaik.
I think we need to settle this no matter how the ratings are treated. What are your thoughts on Limited Durability Negation from both continuities based on Vietthai's suggestion?
Hmm, 4D hax sound weird to me cause we don't applies dimensionality to hax anymore. But anyway, what do you think about my Limited Durability Negation suggestion?
While we can't ignore examples like Zoro's (though his effectiveness is reduced against something more durable), some characters in Kamen Rider Geats (the Bujin Sword is said to be able to cut through anything but in reality it doesn't cut through the bodies of the Kamen Rider Geats characters completely), and Kamen Rider Fourze (who wasn't cut by Kamen Rider Shin's touch and was shown to be able to bypass Fourze's complex armor and durability) but all of them are still accepted as Durability Negation and there are probably many more.
 
Before I give my opinion (doesn't really matter because I'm IH but shrug), how would Limited Dura Negation work? At that point, wouldn't it just be better to say "X normally, X with Kienzan" or something?
 
Before I give my opinion (doesn't really matter because I'm IH but shrug), how would Limited Dura Negation work? At that point, wouldn't it just be better to say "X normally, X with Kienzan" or something?
Listing it in AP seems counterintuitive, as we have El Manga Legendario (an older source) and DBZ: Kakarot Encyclopedia (a more recent source) stating it's "independent of the user's Battle Power." Battle Power refers to the user's Ki level. Ki is accepted as UES, and among the many properties in the DB world, Kienzan is never stated to be the same as these, such as how Future Trunks uses Ki to sharpen or strengthen his sword to be able to injure opponents equal or stronger than him.

Also, if it's related to Ki/UES/Battle Power, then I would agree that a sword user like Future Trunks would have a "higher/far higher" rating, as this is similar to "Charged Attacks," like how the Kamehameha, SBC, and Galick Gun work, which are tied to the user's concentrated Ki, and therefore have a "Varies, far higher with Kamehameha" rating.
 
Like said before, if secondary sources contradicts the primary one, they should be ignored.

Btw agree with the removals of those abilities.
 
Last edited:
That just sounds like those also should just have their ratings removed as well.
I disagree with this. As I stated to Da3ggman, we have two sources stating the same thing, with the old and new sources stating the same thing. And is that statement supported in the primary source? Yes, it's stated to work on Frieza, though it didn't work on Perfect Cell. At least the narrator or author reaffirms that statement.
Listing it in AP seems counterintuitive, as we have El Manga Legendario (an older source) and DBZ: Kakarot Encyclopedia (a more recent source) stating it's "independent of the user's Battle Power." Battle Power refers to the user's Ki level. Ki is accepted as UES, and among the many properties in the DB world, Kienzan is never stated to be the same as these, such as how Future Trunks uses Ki to sharpen or strengthen his sword to be able to injure opponents equal or stronger than him.

Also, if it's related to Ki/UES/Battle Power, then I would agree that a sword user like Future Trunks would have a "higher/far higher" rating, as this is similar to "Charged Attacks," like how the Kamehameha, SBC, and Galick Gun work, which are tied to the user's concentrated Ki, and therefore have a "Varies, far higher with Kamehameha" rating.
In the first paragraph, it states that it's "independent of the user's Battle Power." Why is it categorized as AP when it's not tied to that? It doesn't make sense to equate these with the Kamehameha, SBC, and Galick Gun, which are concentrated attacks that are clearly related to "AP/Battle Power," which is why we already listed them in the AP section for "Charged Attacks" before or under the technique's name. Furthermore, it's stated to be completely different, with the word "unique" compared to every other property in the DB universe.
悟空やベジータに実力では及ばなくても、クリリンには一撃必殺の気円斬がある! 「なんでも切れる」という技の性質は『ドラゴンボール』の世界ではちょっと特殊で、自分より強い相手にも通用するなど、原作ではある種の切り札的に使われることも多かった必殺技です。
"Even though Krillin may not be able to match Goku or Vegeta in strength, he has the Kienzan, a one-hit kill technique. The “property of being able to cut anything” is somewhat special in the world of Dragon Ball, and since it can even work on opponents stronger than him, it was often used in the original manga as a kind of trump-card move."
So you're going to remove all of those from every character profile because of this? Besides, aren't they also stated to have the same statement as the Kienzan, other than simply stating that it "can cut through anything and everything"?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top