• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Logic Manipulation Addition Thread

DontTalkDT

A Fossil at This Point
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Bronze Supporter
Messages
11,879
Reaction score
14,532
So, Logic Manipulation is a thing now. Hence, for a limited time only, say if you want it added in this thread and, if it's sufficiently obvious, we can approve it right here.
Might take the best suggestions as an example for the page as well.

If any other staff feel like helping with the evaluation, maybe because they know some verse, they're free to do so.

Tips to get your thing accepted​

  1. Keep things short. If I have to read half a chapter to evaluate your case, I will likely tell you to do a CRT instead.
  2. Give context. If you present a statement in a void, I will suspect it's ooc bs.
  3. Tell me at least one rule of logic that was broken in your case. It's very unlikely that I will accept a case in this thread in which logic manipulation is done without some feat violating regular logic. Also, mind the defining logic section.
  4. Remember that existing in a logic-violating state is paraconsistent physiology. We don't do that here.
 
Since Venozdonoa is already listed as example can we apply the ability to that page?

As for other examples
This should qualify under Paradox Creation where user can create both scenerio as true and false and existing simultaneously to contradict the logic
Also Anos eyes which should qualify too. Already explanation is on the profile but if needed will explain further.
; The power of this magic eye is the essence of destruction, but in chaotic form. It has the power to destroy even the indestructible, but even that is merely an after-effect spilling out from this magic. This magic eye is capable of destroying order and reason. If there's a contradiction between this magic eye and the reason that must be destroyed, Anos will win unilaterally. Compared to the reason which makes a single event certainly happen, it's far more advantageous for this magic eye which makes this event never happen. Additionally, the contradiction turns into the power of this magic eye. This magic eye can make events that will certainly happen and/or already happened never happen, by destroying reason and creating a logical contradiction, therefore unilaterally winning. In other words, as one possible use of this magic eye, Anos can destroy a power after the power already affected him, by destroying the reason of the power and creating a logical contradiction, therefore unilaterally winning, and subsequently nullifying the power's effect as if he was never even affected to begin with; e.g. Destroyed Eques' <Beld Rase Femblem>, which induces an inescapable predetermined fate that affects the target even if they go back to the past before the creation of the world and use their power, after the power already affected him, by destroying the reason of <Beld Rase Femblem> and creating a logical contradiction, therefore unilaterally winning, and subsequently nullifying the power's effect as if he was never even affected to begin with.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please don't derail this thread with unnecessary discussion. It was just posted and already people are jumping the gun. I will delete any comments that are not related to suggestions and evaluations of possible examples for the ability.

And by the way, if Agnaa thought that the main example of the ability was wack and didn't fit, he would never have agreed to post the page as it is. There was, in fact, some contentions, but after a little clarification from DT, they were put aside.

Other than that, no derailment.
 
If you’re able to cause the loss of Logic and Reason itself from the world, would that qualify as Logic deletion?
 
Beelzebub from Granblue with Chaos matter or Chaos itself
Chaos is basically capable of creating contradictory entities that are both biological and inorganic (paradox creation), and because it adheres to a different kind of logic. That means Laws as well shift according to it
It exists in direct opposition to Order, where Logic exists (Erasure in some sort). I can elaborate more on these if needed. But in a nutshell, they are basically principles and concepts
Causing Night and Day to exist simultaneously
Lastly. It is capable of causing death to beings who completely lack any conception of death(basically primals/angels), which similar act that is stated is a great paradox

Btw, black background = Read from the bottom
 
I had planned this for a crt, but I guess I'll get logic checked out here first. Explanation here; seen logic manip section, and the abilities section in there shows how it'd be explained (the latter half mostly). They're both labeled and simple to find ofc. I suppose it could be argued for both logic creation and deletion(or paradox creation? I mean they maintain they are stronger, while the opponent does as well, but eh)

In summary, the mentioned aspects don't exists for Gods, so they create everything based on their whims like painting colors and imposing everything. That is done through settings—creating, manipulating, and even erasing logic, reason and common sense when they involve settings.

The easiest example is to ignore inconsistency and contradictions along with that, to ignore opponent abilities and maintain they are the strongest as the truth, enforcing it as right. Settings are like statements, or even a simple word by the author which enforce their rightness. Ex., "I am the strongest", that is the truth painted over reality and themselves, to surpass that is to ignore the contradictions saying the opponent isn't, which Ruphas does through settings as well. As such, even if the opponent transcends them and should be superior, it is immediately not the case, despite how contradictory that may seem.
 
Might be a bit much for Donttalk to read, its simple enough to prove just post the Avatar Dina quote about ignoring reason, theorem etc, and then that one quote about using non-logic to brute force everything.

But if they want to go through all that, that's fine.
 
Yeah it is a little lengthy since it was meant for a crt type discussion not gonna lie (I should have shortened it for here). This power will be logic manip for alovenus's mana, and settings (and thus the things tied to it).

Main points/scans to look out for is the fact that even as an avatar Alovenus makes logic, reason, common sense, theorems, laws etc, meaningless. She can control all logic and reason (this is said separate from laws, which also don't exist in realm of God). And their fight as Gods is using non-logic to brute force everything, enforce their truths, logic and reason behind strength doesn't matter, ignoring inconsistencies and contradictions. They can create and overwrite anything including those. Through this, powers, speed, skills (and as a consequence, concepts, laws, etc) all get rendered meaningless with what they do.

Hopefully that's simpler and shorter, the sandbox can be looked at for more info. They stress the ability to do anything with all that in mind. So not sure if we'd consider this breaking all rules and what not. I've honestly seen arguments for principle of explosion with them, given how nonsensical the ability gets.
 
Last edited:
Those aren't valid examples of logic manipulation as the ability was just introduced, most likely they have to get the ability removed until proper evaluation. Tho they weren't added secretly, some profiles already had logic feats, and even though the ability didn't formally exist, some indexed it and redirected it to Law Manipulation.
 
Yes, they are likely all parts of the old redirects from logic manipulation to law manipulation. That is why I asked if the links in those pages need to be changed to law manipulation instead. 🙏
 
Okay. Thank you for helping out. 🙏
 
Thanks again. 🙏❤️
 

 
Ok, I finally have a day without overtime, so let's get to those.
Since Venozdonoa is already listed as example can we apply the ability to that page?

As for other examples
This should qualify under Paradox Creation where user can create both scenerio as true and false and existing simultaneously to contradict the logic

Also Anos eyes which should qualify too. Already explanation is on the profile but if needed will explain further.
; The power of this magic eye is the essence of destruction, but in chaotic form. It has the power to destroy even the indestructible, but even that is merely an after-effect spilling out from this magic. This magic eye is capable of destroying order and reason. If there's a contradiction between this magic eye and the reason that must be destroyed, Anos will win unilaterally. Compared to the reason which makes a single event certainly happen, it's far more advantageous for this magic eye which makes this event never happen. Additionally, the contradiction turns into the power of this magic eye. This magic eye can make events that will certainly happen and/or already happened never happen, by destroying reason and creating a logical contradiction, therefore unilaterally winning. In other words, as one possible use of this magic eye, Anos can destroy a power after the power already affected him, by destroying the reason of the power and creating a logical contradiction, therefore unilaterally winning, and subsequently nullifying the power's effect as if he was never even affected to begin with; e.g. Destroyed Eques' <Beld Rase Femblem>, which induces an inescapable predetermined fate that affects the target even if they go back to the past before the creation of the world and use their power, after the power already affected him, by destroying the reason of <Beld Rase Femblem> and creating a logical contradiction, therefore unilaterally winning, and subsequently nullifying the power's effect as if he was never even affected to begin with.
Those sound fine to me.
If you’re able to cause the loss of Logic and Reason itself from the world, would that qualify as Logic deletion?
Not without context.
Beelzebub from Granblue with Chaos matter or Chaos itself
Chaos is basically capable of creating contradictory entities that are both biological and inorganic (paradox creation), and because it adheres to a different kind of logic. That means Laws as well shift according to it
It exists in direct opposition to Order, where Logic exists (Erasure in some sort). I can elaborate more on these if needed. But in a nutshell, they are basically principles and concepts
Causing Night and Day to exist simultaneously
Lastly. It is capable of causing death to beings who completely lack any conception of death(basically primals/angels), which similar act that is stated is a great paradox
Btw, black background = Read from the bottom
It's kinda weird how day and night simultanously is just both sun and moon being in the sky. Is there context on what the inorganic & organic beings are like?
I had planned this for a crt, but I guess I'll get logic checked out here first. Explanation here; seen logic manip section, and the abilities section in there shows how it'd be explained (the latter half mostly). They're both labeled and simple to find ofc. I suppose it could be argued for both logic creation and deletion(or paradox creation? I mean they maintain they are stronger, while the opponent does as well, but eh)

In summary, the mentioned aspects don't exists for Gods, so they create everything based on their whims like painting colors and imposing everything. That is done through settings—creating, manipulating, and even erasing logic, reason and common sense when they involve settings.

The easiest example is to ignore inconsistency and contradictions along with that, to ignore opponent abilities and maintain they are the strongest as the truth, enforcing it as right. Settings are like statements, or even a simple word by the author which enforce their rightness. Ex., "I am the strongest", that is the truth painted over reality and themselves, to surpass that is to ignore the contradictions saying the opponent isn't, which Ruphas does through settings as well. As such, even if the opponent transcends them and should be superior, it is immediately not the case, despite how contradictory that may seem.
The mortal statements don't convince me at all. Those just sound like absurdity and some reality warping.
The avatar statements say logic, but don't really show anything that sounds like a violation of a logical principle.
Similar thing for the realm of god. Sure, it says that they cause a paradox, for example, but then the context says that a thing like hearing each other while moving at faster than light speed. That isn't a logical paradox!

Ultimately, I fail to see anything that suggests that the author doesn't just mean violating laws (of physics or otherwise) and being generally absurd, in the way "breaking logic" is used at times.

Mmmmhhh... Idk. Time paradoxes don't qualify for logical paradoxes in our book.
A triangle with 720° interior angles is also possible in some weird non-Euclidean geometries.
I guess square circles might be an example, but I feel like that may be better classified as mathematics manipulation?
Is that magic ever used to do something or is it only a way to make false arguments seem valid?
 
Because nobody said it before:


Currently he has this:
I do think that it should be changed from Law Manipulation to Logic Manipulation, given that his entire gimmick is causing Looney Tunes shit just to make calamities happen against you, in fact, the Notable Attack and Techniques section expands on it a lot (I am not copy-pasting it here, it's really easy to find anyway).
 
Because nobody said it before:


Currently he has this:
I do think that it should be changed from Law Manipulation to Logic Manipulation, given that his entire gimmick is causing Looney Tunes shit just to make calamities happen against you, in fact, the Notable Attack and Techniques section expands on it a lot (I am not copy-pasting it here, it's really easy to find anyway).
I see nothing here to support that it does anything that breaks classical logic. It just seems to use logic to mean "system" or "ruleset".
 
It's kinda weird how day and night simultanously is just both sun and moon being in the sky. Is there context on what the inorganic & organic beings are like?
Well, not much context since it is a one-time boss that vanishes after defeat.
its just a Dark entity (Made of Chaos) that mimics an existing entity, and yeah, the moon and sun just exist at the same time

Az9OrKn.png
 
Well, not much context since it is a one-time boss that vanishes after defeat.
its just a Dark entity (Made of Chaos) that mimics an existing entity, and yeah, the moon and sun just exist at the same time

Az9OrKn.png
Hmmm.... I'm honestly not sure. I guess personally, I would slightly lean towards saying it's fine to list the ability.
However, for the negation of immortality you mention, from how the manipulation of causality is mentioned in particular in the explanation, it appears more like that particular part of causality based.
 
@DontTalkDT For this particular example, Logic is a fundamental rule in the world that dictates things like math or cause and effect, with characters that exist outside of logic being undefined by any form of man defined systems and theory as they're literally outside of any scientific or mathematic explanation. The thing that causes the loss of logic and reason is also outside of logic altogether if that helps.
 
Hmmm.... I'm honestly not sure. I guess personally, I would slightly lean towards saying it's fine to list the ability.
However, for the negation of immortality you mention, from how the manipulation of causality is mentioned in particular in the explanation, it appears more like that particular part of causality based.
Well Causality being affected is still a byproduct of it, since Chaos basically just distorts everything.
NF6zW2Z.png



For the specific paradox event regarding enforcing rebirth and death on those who completely lack it. Would you say this also qualifies?
 
Also i have another character I'm making a profile for that I believe qualifies. (He is not connected to chaos or anything, etc.)

Biyao Mingyao is basically this


Although it did not directly mention logic, it mostly just Reason

Biyao Mingyao gave Siwen the diving technique that can make Transcendental beings like him
Although Siwen failed to properly create one.
What he created is still stated to be able to reach Biyao Mingyao, who transcends logic (This did not happen initially, but Siwen, at the end of the story, managed to do so, allowing them to finally reach and affect him even if he tries to escape)
His description mentioned that this logic is only the Logic of the World, which likely implies the reality they live in. (Currently accepted to extend up to Low 1-A)
kJMiGFW.png
 
The mortal statements don't convince me at all. Those just sound like absurdity and some reality warping.
The avatar statements say logic, but don't really show anything that sounds like a violation of a logical principle.
Similar thing for the realm of god. Sure, it says that they cause a paradox, for example, but then the context says that a thing like hearing each other while moving at faster than light speed. That isn't a logical paradox!

Ultimately, I fail to see anything that suggests that the author doesn't just mean violating laws (of physics or otherwise) and being generally absurd, in the way "breaking logic" is used at times.
The way reasoning specifically gets used in series isn't just connected to laws of the world (like physics as you said)especially when laws dont exist in their realm. It's used for decisions, judgements, explanations for actions, the characters' mind understanding based on logic deduction, etc. Examples like: Decision making, explanations or answers based on any form of logic, overall doing contradictory things that defy reasoning. This brings us to the realm of God which is about making reason nothing. This is because they instead enforce their own truths, enforcing they are right, thus disregarding normal logic and reason. As we know said logic being correct reasoning. By doing so, nothing works, like abilities, regardless of the reason why they should defeat her. Once the truth "'I am the strongest" is stated, it cant be bypassed, making her the winner unilaterally. That is unless you apply settings, ignore contradictions that come about by trying to surpass it, to label your own truth. Which at this point, seems to be gearing towards logical contradiction I think? There can't be anything else in reality, no in between reason to defeat her, if Alovenus simply makes the statement she is the strongest. Thus overwriting anything. All attempts to defeat her turn contradictory, but if the reason and logic behind ones strength is ignored, which would cause said contradictions, you challenge it with your own claim. For example, "Ruphas can't challenge Alovenus", reasoning of "'she is weaker", "she is at the limit of her strength", "Alovenus is stronger", all because Alovenus being the strongest is labeled truth. By ignoring reasonings, and logic you defy that, and she can be stronger.


The "paradoxes" statement I agree, that one specifically is there to stress that she can bend laws as well. It's explaining she can bend everything to her will (and again kindly lists everything this involves..), and as such said laws are part of that. But the statements seem to use law separate from common sense, logic and reasoning. Even theorems, mentioned there which to my understanding must use some sortve logical deductions. To say "just laws" kinda seems to go against the author intentions. On the contrary, it looks to stress contradictions get allowed, and there is nonsensical reasoning everywhere. Like when the series wants us to know laws are messed with, like here, we are told. But it seems more like by applying her logic, every aspect can change along with it. Laws can be the rules, but there's still no reason or explanation behind them, like this, as her power can't fundamentally be explained by reason. It's just "the truth". As even in a realm where laws don't exist, it's her messing with reason that ultimately changes everything.

Not sure if this helps but once you reach level 4200 you can do illogical feats. At 5100 a punch can make it be morning,noon, night, all at once
 
Last edited:
@DontTalkDT For this particular example, Logic is a fundamental rule in the world that dictates things like math or cause and effect, with characters that exist outside of logic being undefined by any form of man defined systems and theory as they're literally outside of any scientific or mathematic explanation. The thing that causes the loss of logic and reason is also outside of logic altogether if that helps.
So does this theoretical thing called Logic have feats relating to actual logical principles?
Well Causality being affected is still a byproduct of it, since Chaos basically just distorts everything.
NF6zW2Z.png



For the specific paradox event regarding enforcing rebirth and death on those who completely lack it. Would you say this also qualifies?
Yeah, but Chaos having logic manipulation doesn't mean every effect it manifests is logic manipulation based. It can warp causality, without that warping being done by twisting logic.
Isn't the rebirth thing the same as the immortality thing in terms of what is overcome?

Also i have another character I'm making a profile for that I believe qualifies. (He is not connected to chaos or anything, etc.)

Biyao Mingyao is basically this


Although it did not directly mention logic, it mostly just Reason

Biyao Mingyao gave Siwen the diving technique that can make Transcendental beings like him
Although Siwen failed to properly create one.
What he created is still stated to be able to reach Biyao Mingyao, who transcends logic (This did not happen initially, but Siwen, at the end of the story, managed to do so, allowing them to finally reach and affect him even if he tries to escape)
His description mentioned that this logic is only the Logic of the World, which likely implies the reality they live in. (Currently accepted to extend up to Low 1-A)
kJMiGFW.png

If I haven't missed anything, I don't see any specific rule of logic they seem to break here.
The way reasoning specifically gets used in series isn't just connected to laws of the world (like physics as you said)especially when laws dont exist in their realm. It's used for decisions, judgements, explanations for actions, the characters' mind understanding based on logic deduction, etc. Examples like: Decision making, explanations or answers based on any form of logic, overall doing contradictory things that defy reasoning. This brings us to the realm of God which is about making reason nothing. This is because they instead enforce their own truths, enforcing they are right, thus disregarding normal logic and reason. As we know said logic being correct reasoning. By doing so, nothing works, like abilities, regardless of the reason why they should defeat her. Once the truth "'I am the strongest" is stated, it cant be bypassed, making her the winner unilaterally. That is unless you apply settings, ignore contradictions that come about by trying to surpass it, to label your own truth. Which at this point, seems to be gearing towards logical contradiction I think? There can't be anything else in reality, no in between reason to defeat her, if Alovenus simply makes the statement she is the strongest. Thus overwriting anything. All attempts to defeat her turn contradictory, but if the reason and logic behind ones strength is ignored, which would cause said contradictions, you challenge it with your own claim. For example, "Ruphas can't challenge Alovenus", reasoning of "'she is weaker", "she is at the limit of her strength", "Alovenus is stronger", all because Alovenus being the strongest is labeled truth. By ignoring reasonings, and logic you defy that, and she can be stronger.


The "paradoxes" statement I agree, that one specifically is there to stress that she can bend laws as well. It's explaining she can bend everything to her will (and again kindly lists everything this involves..), and as such said laws are part of that. But the statements seem to use law separate from common sense, logic and reasoning. Even theorems, mentioned there which to my understanding must use some sortve logical deductions. To say "just laws" kinda seems to go against the author intentions. On the contrary, it looks to stress contradictions get allowed, and there is nonsensical reasoning everywhere. Like when the series wants us to know laws are messed with, like here, we are told. But it seems more like by applying her logic, every aspect can change along with it. Laws can be the rules, but there's still no reason or explanation behind them, like this, as her power can't fundamentally be explained by reason. It's just "the truth". As even in a realm where laws don't exist, it's her messing with reason that ultimately changes everything.

Not sure if this helps but once you reach level 4200 you can do illogical feats. At 5100 a punch can make it be morning,noon, night, all at once
Messing with mental reasoning capabilities or overcoming what those can imagine doesn't qualify. Making an ability not work anymore by how someone else reasoned it would isn't logic manipulation.
The morning and night at once thing seems to be about spaces and times being mushed together, rather than being a result of logical contradiction.
 
If I haven't missed anything, I don't see any specific rule of logic they seem to break here.
It was more so for not being affected by reason in said reality. But if it's not qualified, then I'll just pen it as part of his plot hax or being beyond their understanding
Isn't the rebirth thing the same as the immortality thing in terms of what is overcome?
In a sense, yes, but this time it was achieved without the use of chaos. There was just a mention of it being a paradox rather than just overcoming immunity from a lack of suchan aspect, etc. There was also a mention later in that video where the energy or whatever is left from those affected became something like Paraconsistent, and no longer something that qualifies from either side of Creation, and being paradoxical
Yeah, but Chaos having logic manipulation doesn't mean every effect it manifests is logic manipulation based. It can warp causality, without that warping being done by twisting logic.
I guess that's true. Then I would just list it as Paradox Creation and Erasure for Chaos (Since Chaos Matters, which is what Beelzebub used specifically, is still stated to erode providence, which includes logic).
While the immortality bypassing would just be causality hax related. (I was under the impression it is also Logic manipulation since it negates even regenerative factors or the concept of indestructibility [Primal Beast/Fallen Angels represent a concept, idea, or abstract]. and not just immortality)

Now, last question. Would this grant the Creator of Providence, or where Providence originates from, Logic creation? Since I'm currently making a profile for those Creators for the said franchise

And if not too much. a question that would help understand logic manipulation
Is there anyway being able to affect the Principles qualify in a form of logic manipulation? Since the Law of Excluded Middle and Non-Contradiction is a principle on which Classic Logic is built.
 
Last edited:
@DontTalkDT There's some statements about things outside of logic that's very similar to the logical principle examples you have like mathematics and cause and effect in the world.
 
Messing with mental reasoning capabilities or overcoming what those can imagine doesn't qualify. Making an ability not work anymore by how someone else reasoned it would isn't logic manipulation.
The morning and night at once thing seems to be about spaces and times being mushed together, rather than being a result of logical contradiction.
🤔This confuses me a little, because she does things which match with the logic page pretty well. The "mental reasoning" is like an example of her power controlling everything too. Currently it's marked as CM, law, plot, etc. But the author seems to want us to also understand she can mess with all this, because with logic, and breaks all these rules. She is illogical, inconsistent & unrealistic. So...what do we consider these kind of things, when the author drops all these statements of breaking logic and reason, and is supposed to be separate from other aspects?

She is basically messing with logic and perception, which when altered cause madness. These things govern the existence, or reality, thus she can mess with all of it. Her power enables and ignores contradictions, is clearly nonsensical, and thus alters rules like cooling water making fire and vice versa simply by manipulating reason.

Alovenus is clearly manipulating and breaking things that mess with deductive reasoning(theorems, etc), thus using "non-logic"(her own truths) to get results. Messing with logic to enforce your own warrants results like this, where all laws don't apply.


Settings are the main example though. Ignoring even the avatar statements, there are ones in realm of God itself also messing with reason. Where through settings or statements made by the author,"'I am the strongest" is true, and thus surpassing her is denied by her opponents unless they also break logic and reason. This makes it so Alovenus will always be above her opponent and win, because if it's true she is the strongest, her "'not being the strongest" can't be true otherwise. I feel like you could argue messing with law of noncontradiction with this at least. As they create and ignore contradictions to mess with Alovenus's truth, and to get stronger themselves.
 
Last edited:
The mortal statements don't convince me at all. Those just sound like absurdity and some reality warping.
The avatar statements say logic, but don't really show anything that sounds like a violation of a logical principle.
Similar thing for the realm of god. Sure, it says that they cause a paradox, for example, but then the context says that a thing like hearing each other while moving at faster than light speed. That isn't a logical paradox!

Ultimately, I fail to see anything that suggests that the author doesn't just mean violating laws (of physics or otherwise) and being generally absurd, in the way "breaking logic" is used at times.
So I think it is fair to go over this step by step in order to fully grasp and comprehend the structure of both the world of Awlba and the story as a whole. At its core Awlba isn't just describing characters who break logic in a flashy hyperbolical meaningless way but actually in a setting where reality is rule-based in the sense that what exists in the world follow a specific standard and framework, and where certain beings are violating that condition and rule-based order by existing outside it. Alovenus's story is pretty much structured very carefully to show the difference between her acting within a world's foundations while being able to alter and/or ignore them and her essentially changing those foundations all together.

Establishing the foundations:
On the original universe and earth Alovenus "comes from", reality is presented as essentially normal. People are born, they suffer and they die. Cause and effect works as you'd expect and even miracles (Alovenus doing her thing) do not alter the long term structure of the world. Alovenus appears here as a singularity, an anomaly who is the only being with supernatural power in which a singularity is a point where ordinary description and extrapolation break down, where you cannot keep applying the same rules and expect sensible answers. Her actions, no matter how dramatic are still constrained by the world’s existing foundations (prior to her altering or enforcing new laws and whatnot). She heals the sick, saves the wounded and rescues the suffering, yet the story emphasizes that it is ultimately meaningless, people are "made to die," to be fragile etc and the world inevitably returns to its original state. Her interventions would for the lack of better words be like temporarily changing the positions of furnitures in a collapsing house, basically the structure itself remains unchanged and the outcome does not truly improve.

So the problem in itself was not a lack of power but it was that the world's way of being and its foundations already guaranteed suffering. As long as she existed inside/within that framework while still not being confined by those foundations, everything she fixed would eventually amount to nothing for anyone that's not her, meaning Inference-wise, this is equivalent to a system where a premise such as "this light is on" is always forced by the world's underlying foundational structure to eventually collapse into "this light is not on" either through logical necessity (such as deductive closure within the system's enforced rules) or through ordinary causal progression, like the light being turned off or the light bulb dying out. In such a framework it would be impossible for any proposition to remain indefinitely fixed in a single state, as the world itself restores consistency in accordance with its logical order. So in a world governed by the law of non-contradiction, such a state (the light being both on and not on in the same respect) is impossible. The texts point is that Alovenus eventually moves beyond a world where such prohibitions are foundational (wherein "this light is on" and "this light is not on" are such prohibitions). That realization is essentially what leads directly to her conclusion that saving the world requires flipping it over completely and changing the foundations (essentially reprogramming humans and making them immortal among others things, such as removing the concept of hatred and other bad concepts from their nature etc.)

When Alovenus reaches the "end" of the universe, the text makes it very explicit, such that a being surpassing the speed of light is acknowledged as impossible and catastrophic for ordinary matter, which would normally be just her ignoring the laws of physics and not violating logic, but then the story immediately dismissed it and not because she is "so strong" but because it ties back on her being a singularity, unbound by the universe's laws. So the example she gave us of "cooling water" helps us understand what she alongside the story is actually trying to tell us, cooling water normally produces ice and that expectation represents everyday, unquestioned common sense as well as how physical laws are established and work. When Alovenus declares that cooling water will instead produce fire, the universe does not comply, instead she enforces laws without any regard for whether they preserve consistency, explanation or rational derivation regardless of what the worlds foundational principles says or thinks. So the text is not saying she creates fire, but the rule linking cause to effect has been replaced. Why? Who knows? And normally the question of why only makes sense inside a fixed logical framework. Once the framework itself can be ignored or altered/changed, explanation becomes irrelevant. So the "I can do it" line, instead functions as the truth because truth is no longer derived but instead is imposed unto reality.

This is then reinforced later through Sanieve's divine skill Muliphen. Muliphen is described as applying new laws as firmly and steadfast as normal laws of physics: so cooling freezes and heating boils. It essentially makes it clear and represents laws of reality as something that is causally automatic and unavoidable. Muliphen shows what rule and law enforcement actually looks like when it works normally. Alovenus's earlier example shows what happens when the authority behind the rules changes. One injects laws into a system while the other decides what laws the system recognizes at all.

Add-on Examples:
Thulhu is another great inverse example. He is not the author or god of reality, but a bug, a being that emerged outside the rules and laws of the world. When Sanieve's divine skill Muliphen (Like other skills from other agents of the Goddess, his unique skill has higher priority than any other skills. These skills are absolute as they are permitted by Alovenus rules. They can't be prevented, take absolute priority over all skills in place, and once used are absolutely certain to happen) fails on him, the narration does not describe brute resistance, it just explains that laws simply do not bind him. He exists in contradiction to the Goddess's rules, so the laws shatter on contact. His ability to twist the world into incoherence while blurring near and far, solid and liquid, sense and nonsense, would mirror Alovenus's foundational authority in a distorted way. Not to mention Alovenus's avatar, stated not to be on the level of true form Alovenus (for obvious reasons) but was still absurdly powerful. Wherein she was able to warp reality as much as she wanted, and she could control logic and reason however she liked. All of creation was nothing more than a set of toys to her, creatures mere dolls, so what she was about to do was put on a one-night puppet show. She used Azathoth and flipped everything, thus reality flipped on its head. Black became white and vice versa. Fiction and reality switched places. Even the wicked god's (Thulhu) little world was painted over by the Goddess's selfish rules in an instant. Reality, dreams, the past, the present and the future all came under her control. Nothing was impossible. "I can do it." Such selfishness was allowed and could reach infinity. It could even invent something above infinity, and that was the type of existence the Goddess Alovenus was. Meaning that Thulhu still got caught up in and was affected by Alovenus's avatar's attack, despite being someone who was supposed to be able to ignore and completely disregard the laws of the world by completely existing outside its framework, as well as those laws that were forcefully imposed on him.

Both Alovenus and Thulhu deliberately rewrites common sense of the world, while Thulhu also erodes it by existing outside the worlds jurisdiction. Thulhu is level 1000 between, so even he is nothing compared to level 1500, 2000 and level 4200 Ruphas who was stated to intercept an attack that ignored reason, providence, common sense, logic, theorems, or law, as all of it was powerless and none of it meant anything or could do anything.

Isn't it peculiar that the author brought up common sense, logic, theorems and laws as separate entities?
If we were to define all of them, we'll have to start with common sense.

"Common sense is the basic, practical judgment and sound reasoning most people share, allowing for reasonable decisions in everyday life, based on simple perceptions and widely accepted knowledge, without needing specialized expertise or deep analysis. It's about understanding obvious truths, like not stepping in front of a moving car, and making practical choices, often expressed as "It's just common sense!".

"Logic is the study of correct reasoning, principles, and valid inference, focusing on how to draw sound conclusions from premises, essentially a system for structured thinking that examines arguments for consistency and truth, applicable from everyday problem-solving. It helps determine if a conclusion must follow from given information, distinguishing it from psychology (how people actually think) by defining how we should think to be rational."

"A theorem is a statement, especially in mathematics and logic, that has been proven true using deductive reasoning from axioms, definitions, and previously established theorems. Essentially, it's a claim verified by a logical proof, not just supported by evidence, making it a backbone of formal systems."

"A law refers to fundamental, immutable principles governing reality, encompassing both scientific laws (like gravity or thermodynamics, describing physical interactions) and metaphysical/spiritual laws (like the Law of Attraction or Cause & Effect, describing energetic and conscious principles) that dictate cosmic order and function at all scales, from particle physics to human experience."

We also have an entire bar encounter in an afterword where the laws of physics and the law of conservation of mass are complaining to the author that Ruphas is bending them over and shoving their backside with a cactus, due to how she essentially treats them as irrelevant and only uses them when it is convenient for her.

It is starting to make a lot of sense to say that a law in Awlba isn't simply a rule or principle that allows one to understand how physical interaction is possible, among other things, but that it instead should be viewed as an umbrella that encompasses a multitude of things simultaneously. As such, a law being imposed by Alovenus might be a rule in which hot=hot,hot=cold, cold=cold, blue=red, blue≠blue and/or even be a concept or a plot/narrative.

So it would make sense to argue that since Alovenus is an all-encompassing entity, her law manipulation isn’t simply just law manipulation, but instead includes logic, common sense, plot, conceptual manipulation among others as byproducts in a complete package which is her setting.

Both Ruphas and Benetnash are born in Midgard, a world whose foundations Alovenus already altered from her previous world. Through levels and mana, the world gradually allows inhabitants to escape ordinary constraints. When you reach higher levels such as 1000 and 1500 (after breaking the metaphysical barrier or limit Alovenus has imposed unto reality), combat is explicitly framed as a contest of who can ignore common sense more. Where breaking through the 1000 level limit was a prerequisite for having the "right to challenge Alovenus" as a starting point. Alovenus has plot manipulation on her profile, as the world itself moves in accordance with the scenario written by Alovenus. This plot manipulation as I mentioned above would include and define all abilities and aspects of reality/creation due to how her powers work, as well as the Final Point, which I will talk about next.

Endpoint/Final Point:
When it comes to the Realm of God, the Endpoint which is an infinite structureless "space" where universes are compared to programs and folders. Here, there, scale, time, distance, size, speed and limits have no inherent meaning unless someone paints them into existence. That is why characters can have infinite speed (though in reality their speed is beyond infinite and immeasurable). They are able to speak in a frozen vacuum and ignore time-based restrictions. The space does not intrinsically have rules/frameworks or boundaries (as it would be the last and all-encompassing boundary of everything) as rules exist only if willed into being by God. When Alovenus declares that reason and providence are nothing, or when Ruphas realizes that victory is simply a matter of asserting "I am stronger," the story is being literal. At this level concepts/laws/logic among others must be created to matter at all.

To add on a point I brought up earlier. On Vsbw Settings imposed by Alovenus (the one in Midgard being known as the Goddess scenario) are already accepted as a form of plot manipulation, and deviating from or ignoring/breaking through that scenario is seen as resistance to plot manipulation or you yourself having plot manipulation. Settings are not ordinary abilities, laws or the likes. But instead they are presented as declared truths imposed unto reality from the Endpoint by God. The Endpoint or otherwise known as the Final Point is more or less a pre-conceptual/pre-creation blank plane where nothing such as laws, causality, logic, providence or even coherent structure exists or bind anyone by default. As such these things only come into being when a God actively defines and enforces them. Because of this, overcoming or ignoring a setting does not simply mean overpowering an attack or bypassing a rule or a law, but it would essentially mean overriding the layer or for the lack of better words, the reason/logic for which decides what counts as true or valid in the first place. With this in mind and seen in this light, the narration's repeated emphasis on reason, providence, common sense, logic, theorems and laws becoming powerless, points to them not being simple rhetorical decorations. As it reflects the fact that the coherence constraints of the scenario itself are being replaced or rendered irrelevant, instead of characters merely misunderstanding events or reasoning incorrectly (but in reality it is pretty much both cases simultaneously due to how the world works).

Overall Conclusion and Summary:
So to sum it all up. Alovenus's progression is going from existing while ignoring restraints/laws in a constrained reality to being truly unconstrained and creating such realities and foundations. As a "mortal" anomaly, she could reshape outcomes, but the world’s foundation would always be itself and absolute. As a god who now occupy the Final Point, instead of violating and existing outside such laws, she would now be the one who controls and imposes such foundations and constraints. Thulhu, Ruphas, Orm and Benetnash among others each reflect different expressions of this same principle: beings for whom the world's rules are absolute but no longer applicable to them (since they do have plot manipulation and resistance to it as well). The contradictions and absurdities that follow are the natural results of a setting where coherence, logic, reason, limit, providence, concepts and laws were never obligatory or binding, but optional constructs enforced only by those with the authority to insist on them.

So if Alovenus was to say:
"The lamp is on. (A)
The lamp is not on. (¬A)
The lamp is neither on nor not on. (¬A ∧ ¬¬A, or, ¬(A ∨ ¬A))
Conclusion: Therefore, the lamp is on and not on, and neither on nor not on."

That would work in her setting because she would make it the truth and define it as what is considered valid, allowing such a paradox to act as if it weren’t one at all. She doesn’t need to explain or justify it, it simply is, due to her authority over these things. This is essentially what the story has been hammering on about.
I could have sworn I saw you say something like:
"As a result, Metaphysical Aspects equal or superior to logic can be considered as High Outerverse level+ aspects of reality as well, provided that their nature does not imply a restriction on the nature of logic, contradicting the above reasoning" wherein it is possible for metaphysical aspects to be equal to or superior to logic, potentially serving as its source, or where logic itself can be instilled into creation and into what exists. Please correct me on this matter if I'm mistaken.

This was longer than I first anticipated, and do excuse me for my formatting, I'm still getting the hang of it all. But either way, I hope this at least made you understand why certain statements were made at said particular moments, and how it all ties back to Alovenus and the Final Point.
 
Last edited:
I could have sworn I saw you say something like:
"As a result, Metaphysical Aspects equal or superior to logic can be considered as High Outerverse level+ aspects of reality as well, provided that their nature does not imply a restriction on the nature of logic, contradicting the above reasoning" wherein it is possible for metaphysical aspects to be equal to or superior to logic, potentially serving as its source, or where logic itself can be instilled into creation and into what exists. Please correct me on this matter if I'm mistaken.
We decided against that to prevent massive overinflation of stats for no good reason. We scale it based on feats now.
 
Ok, so I propose that Marvel Magic gets Logic Manipulation, particularly based on the following:

Magic is also simultaneously outside the concepts of logic yet can also replace them.
As should be obvious by now, simple statements of characters "doing the impossible" or "breaking logic" are not nearly enough to qualify for this ability. Characters must be shown to be capable of directly interfering with a form of deductive reasoning that tangibly governs their verse's reality, and acts as the grounding for intelligibility within the verse.
Fr it's like people aren't even reading the page.
 
Fr it's like people aren't even reading the page.
Wouldn't call it a simple statement, but ok here's some more stuff:

"Magic is taking a thought and making it real. Taking a lie and making it the truth. Telling a story to the universe so utterly, cosmically perfect that for a single, shining moment... the world believes a man can fly ", and those stories that become magic then echo through space and time back to the start of all things, mixing with the All-That-Was and sparking something new, such as the mythical Gods of the Marvel Universe as well as the 10 Norse Realms (each of which is its own universe), becoming so big and mad and brilliant that they go back in time and change other stories, especially as "maybes" and "might-bes" such as "I dunno.", "I can't remember.", and "What if?" are just magic words that make anything possible.

Also, Doctor Doom tells Loki that magic is essentially a higher narrative into the flow of events, imposing a narrative upon reality, imposing a story, a fiction into reality and willing it to become true. To be a creature of magic is to be a creature of story.

"The first step to mastering the Arcane Arts is recognizing the patters that others don't see. (...) The second step to mastering the Arcane Arts is recognizing that patterns can change", with the patterns in question largely including the laws and concepts of the universe. For example, a pattern noted is the standard numerical pattern of "1,2,3,4", but the scan notes that to change the pattern is to change it to "1,2,3, π".
 
Back
Top