- 12,085
- 2,094
I don't think Thanos should be 5-C with the stone, it would be far too much of an outlier for him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These are very good points.They are a couple of old interviews that describes the Hadron Enforcer as a weapon that fires nuclear warheads that creates contained explosions. [1] [2]
If the power of the weapon depends on the warhead loaded in, maybe the scraps didn't allow Racoon to create a moon-level warhead?
It created a smallish explosion when it hit Ronan.
But when it hit Ronan's hammer, it created a much smaller explosion.
but even the guides or whatever is this mentioned that he can tank itAfter what I've read, I'm pretty sure the best options are "Outlier for Ronan"
Yeah, and what is the problem of scaling it to god tiers?If we scale it to Ronan, there's an argument for it to eventually scale to most characters.
well, it will go against this scanIf the weapon is proven to have variable firepower, then we can say that the weapon wasn't used at its full potential (especially since scraps was used to make it along with the ammo).
There's a decent reason to assume Thanos could scale to this. Since he's also a Power Stone user, and he didn't seem too worried even after Ronan got the Power Stone.Okay, let me play the devil's advocate here for a second. If Ronan does indeed scale to the Hadron Enforcer at full power, meaning he did indeed tank a Moon level blast, who would end up scaling to this?
No we cant, because as everyone here was saying some minutes ago, its outlier, but nobody explains the reason to it be an outlier, but still cannot be accepted because yesHmm, call me crazy, but can we not just give the other top tiers aside from Thanos and CM a "likely 5-C" for scaling from the Power Stone? It seems like a fair compromise, and the scaling does seem like it could be viable enough...
there is notExplain the exact reason why this would be an outlier.
Okay. Let me hear from other people now.there is not
So, lets downgrade Thanos to 8-B due being kicked by SpidermanAnd doesn't basically every single Avenger have a feat of harming Thanos or physically clashing with him in some way?
It means that there is no guarantee that it is not weaker than normal or at maximum performance, due to scarcity of resources.Also, why would the ammo being made out of scraps mean it's weaker? Why does the size of the explosion even matter here?
Honestly the MCU profiles look like a messSo, lets downgrade Thanos to 8-B due being kicked by Spiderman
May I please see these two feats side-by-side so we all can confirm this to be accurate?
The non-damaged Hydron used to directly hit Ronan is the one stated to bust moons so its potency can't be questioned, only deemed an outlier or not.If the power of the weapon depends on the warhead loaded in, maybe the scraps didn't allow Racoon to create a moon-level warhead?
It created a smallish explosion when it hit Ronan.
But when it hit Ronan's hammer, it created a much smaller explosion.