- 10,700
- 11,657
Hopefully this is for the last time, at least I don't see any other way the calculation can be improved.
I've made a new calculation regarding Wolfram's giant cube feat, and I believe it should replace the current one.
Current Calculation.
Updated Calculation.
Unlike last time, where I admitted my measurement of the Cube's size was a lowball. This time I'm not lowballing it, I'm getting the actual size. However, there are other issues that are fixed in my updated version. And one was a horrible mistake made in finding the force of the Cube that I'm a bit embarrassed to admit.
I already admitted in the original thread and calculation that the size was lowballed. The reason being is that I measured the cube while Wolfram was making it, meaning it did grow by an unknown amount after what I measured. I felt that was the best I could do at the time. However, this time the cube is finished in my new measurement.
My new px scaling also removes an assumption. I previously used the calculate size for Wolfram's smaller cubes and compared it to the bigger cube. The assumption here is that Wolfram makes all of these cubes in the exact same size. while not impossible, as the size of the cubes are the same when he makes dozens of them.
They're still things he creates by smashing objects together and don't have a stable size. The fan I'm using here is an object Wolfram doesn't create, which means the size doesn't vary. Not unless it gets deformed, which isn't the case here. As such, I feel like using the fan's size here is more accurate than using the smaller cubes for those two reason.
The mistake I made comes from the acceleration, which I calculated completely wrong. The formula I used assumes the initial speed of the cube was 0 m/s, which is wrong. The cube was already in motion beforehand, meaning that value is incorrect. I've instead found the deceleration of the cube from when Izuku and All Might stopped it.
This gives me the force produced in a far less convoluted way.
Note: Scaling or changes to the profiles will be saved for a CRT, this is just to update the calculation. And I've updated the original blog instead of using a new one so I won't have to change any of the links on the profiles. And I'd appreciated it if a calc group member leaves an evaluation in the blog if this is accepted.
Agree: Therefir, CloverDragon03, (2)
Disagree: Damage3245, (1)
Neutral: (0)
I've made a new calculation regarding Wolfram's giant cube feat, and I believe it should replace the current one.
Current Calculation.
Updated Calculation.
Unlike last time, where I admitted my measurement of the Cube's size was a lowball. This time I'm not lowballing it, I'm getting the actual size. However, there are other issues that are fixed in my updated version. And one was a horrible mistake made in finding the force of the Cube that I'm a bit embarrassed to admit.
I already admitted in the original thread and calculation that the size was lowballed. The reason being is that I measured the cube while Wolfram was making it, meaning it did grow by an unknown amount after what I measured. I felt that was the best I could do at the time. However, this time the cube is finished in my new measurement.
My new px scaling also removes an assumption. I previously used the calculate size for Wolfram's smaller cubes and compared it to the bigger cube. The assumption here is that Wolfram makes all of these cubes in the exact same size. while not impossible, as the size of the cubes are the same when he makes dozens of them.
They're still things he creates by smashing objects together and don't have a stable size. The fan I'm using here is an object Wolfram doesn't create, which means the size doesn't vary. Not unless it gets deformed, which isn't the case here. As such, I feel like using the fan's size here is more accurate than using the smaller cubes for those two reason.
The mistake I made comes from the acceleration, which I calculated completely wrong. The formula I used assumes the initial speed of the cube was 0 m/s, which is wrong. The cube was already in motion beforehand, meaning that value is incorrect. I've instead found the deceleration of the cube from when Izuku and All Might stopped it.
This gives me the force produced in a far less convoluted way.
Note: Scaling or changes to the profiles will be saved for a CRT, this is just to update the calculation. And I've updated the original blog instead of using a new one so I won't have to change any of the links on the profiles. And I'd appreciated it if a calc group member leaves an evaluation in the blog if this is accepted.
Agree: Therefir, CloverDragon03, (2)
Disagree: Damage3245, (1)
Neutral: (0)
Last edited: