- 1,022
- 343
whyI think it's not a good idea.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
whyI think it's not a good idea.
I do think that this would work as a tier, but I disagree with it being only characters with 0 Joules or whatnot. Like has been brought up, this is essentially impossible if you're 3-D, and would need actual evidence, which I doubt any verse actually gives, making it obsolete.
I believe Low 10-C should be closer to Jaftens proposal, with characters / entities who are artificial or negligible in most cases on a 3-D scale. This would be programs, viruses (Both computer viruses and biological viruses), and probably cell scale stuff.
However there's still the fact that programs and such, don't actually have energy. Sure, they are composed of electrons and such, but the electrons do not define the character. They still pose no threat to anything other than what is on their level. A cell has infinitely more of a chance of killing you with striking strength than a computer virus does, because it can actually affect and interact with you...
Due to this, these digital/artificial beings would be somewhere even lower, somewhere below the previously defined Low 10-C, but above 11-A, as they are still 3-D.
Perhaps High 11-A is in order too? Characters like this would include the likes of Programs, Computer Viruses, Drawings, Artwork, and more imo, as these all share the same traits of only being notable threats on their own level, but still exist on a 3-Dimensional Axis.
TL;DR: I think it should be along the lines of
- Low 10-C: Closer to what Jaften Proposed, however I'm not sure whether to draw the line at 1 Joule. This would include Cells, Biological Viruses, Bacteria, and anything actually capable of interacting with other 3-D objects.
- High 11-A (Or whatever it could be called): Digital/Artificial Beings such as Computer Viruses, Programs, Drawings, Paintings, etc. That cannot interact with the 3-D world around them as they're bound to their own world, but are still bound to the 3-D world. (If that makes sense...)
i didn't complain about anything in any thread???? and i don't mind haxless 10-Bs I just don't want it to be some average dude with nothing special about him/her at all though.You guys claim you don't want "haxless 10-Bs" on the site, yet are proposing for characters that are vastly weaker. I let lower dimensional ones slide because they are more integral to the dimensional aspect of the system. This however contradicts the complaints about haxless 10-Bs, who mind you, if this was accepted, would be untouchable by a Low 10-C. Please be a little more consistent with these standards.
Could be the (lowest number right after 0) joules to 1 joules.There's no need to make a new tier to say AP: Null. That something that should be specified in the AP section on a profile.
Yeah, now I understand.I'm with Sera about the over extinctions between various 10-C separations. She has had problems with other 10-C profiles and not sure if she still does; though I still defended some for indexing verses such as Pikmin or Osmosis Jones. The High 11-A or Low 10-C tiers aren't even all that prominent enough to have specific tiers; and 10-C isn't even something with a bunch of profiles needed either. It's mostly just the niche verses centered around the tiny characters is where we even have all the 10-C's period. Making 10-C just a bare bones tier left with these separations.
I don't believe that the electrons and tiny currents and such define the character, and in similar contexts, the electronic components are very rarely even acknowledged in-verse.I don't think this makes much sense. They are kind of a threat to things not on their own level, if a cell was placed in the middle of a motherboard it could be zapped by the electricity running around.
If you don't consider that their 'real character' then I don't see how the implication is a new tier; wouldn't you just want to consider them 11-A again?
This could also work I suppose and would solve the problem likely moreso than my suggestion.I do kinda agree with this, and I remember a proposal from Dee/Ultima, which basically went along the lines of making 11-C, 11-B, and 11-A into Low 11-C, 11-C, and High 11-C respectively, and replacing 11-B, 11-A, 10-C, and tiers in-between with as many tiers for smaller beings as necessary (i.e. small animal, insect, parasite, cell, virus, atomic, subatomic, whatever's deemed necessary).