Potential "Tags" for Fun & Games threads

[Bobsican]

As we all now the situation with the topics now being limited to what´s potentially going to actually change a page, rather than just related to the topic itself, it has come the idea to make special "tags" for such threads in the all-known Fun and Games board

Any suggestions?

Examples:

- Off-Topic: Should be used when making meme threads or something not mainly about indexing to the site.

- Hax Revisions: When something about X character/verse´s hax is being revised, questioned, etc, this topic should be used.

- Power Revisions: When a character/verse is getting checked about the Attack Potency, Speed, Durabilty and other stats of this fashion.

- Friendly Discussion: Usable only to threads about simple conversations about a franchise or something up to the OP. Not to be used in the Questions and Answers board for obvious reasons.

- Image Sharing: Applicable to threads which main topic is to well... share pictures for the entertainment of everyone. Not to be used when requesting scans for some sort of CRT.

- RP Thread: For threads about Role Playing characters as a form of entertainment. Not to be confused with a Vs. Thread.

- Non-Serious Battle: Tiers equalized? Stuff like Dora the Explorer with the Triforce Vs. Ultra Instinct Shaggy? Should you make a Vs. Thread that simply wasn´t meant to meet the criteria to be applicable to some profiles, this one is for you.

- Other: Something too unique and specific that doesn´t really fit any of the above? This tag is for you.

 

[Dargoo_Faust]

Looks great to me.

 

[PrettyFearMachine]

I certainly approve of adding the tags for F&G threads.

 

[Bobsican]

Note that they are just examples, they may be applied in the end, but it´s likely that a few more will be needed.

 

[Megamangohan]

Fungus Minipulation?

 

[Bobsican]

Fungus Minipulation?

No, that would bring confusion between the tag and the Fungus Manipulation page (which a bunch of threads need to be removed from it)

There´s also the fact that the before-mentioned Off-Topic tag does what it was meant for in a more appropiate way.

 

[Yobo_Blue]

RP Threads ovo

 

[Bobsican]

RP Threads ovo

Actually, that´s not a bad idea.

Are they still popular so it can be considered more?

 

[Yobo_Blue]

There are still a lot of them if that's what you mean.

 

[HeadlessKramerGeoff777]

Don´t see why a vs debating wiki has roleplays on it tbh.

 

[Bobsican]

Okay, just added it to the OP. I hope I described what it would do right.

 

[Yobo_Blue]

Don´t see why a vs debating wiki has roleplays on it tbh.

Don't see why an indexing wiki has VS Battles on it

 

[Bobsican]

Don´t see why a vs debating wiki has roleplays on it tbh.

Even Pictochat had those TBH.

 

[HeadlessKramerGeoff777]

But why?

 

[Bobsican]

But why?

It´s fun, it´s like how there´s lewd stuff even in obscure forums.

 

[Yobo_Blue]

But why?

Why not?

 

[Ogbunabali]

I agree with this. At least Off-Topic should definitely be a thing.

 

[Darkmon_cns]

Ask some of the staff to comment I gusee.


Also joke battles should be a thing for the fun and games borde.

 

[Bobsican]

Also joke battles should be a thing for the fun and games borde.

That would ruin some of the point of Joke Battes Wiki, unless Ryukama doesn´t mind...

 

[Darkmon_cns]

People still make joke battles on the fan and games borde every now and then, like spring trap with the infinte gauntlet vs all other indie horror franchises.

 

[Darkmon_cns]

Well joke battle actually has profiles for joke characters

 

[Ryukama]

The suggested tags in the OP look good to me.

 

[Bobsican]

Good point, it probably would be nice to have around.

Gotta wait for Ryukama´s input.

Edit: (Looks how Ryukama ninja´d me)

...Oh, I´ll add the Joke Battles idea to the OP.

 

[Ryukama]

Nah I don't think a tag is needed for Joke Battles

 

[Darkmon_cns]

What would you tag them with then?

 

[Bobsican]

Are you sure?

 

[Bobsican]

What would you tag them with then?

Updated the OP, look at about the end of it for that explanation.

 

[Ryukama]

I don't think we need a tag for every single little topic of a F&G Board. Also naming a tag the name of another wiki would just be confusing.

 

[Darkmon_cns]

Well there clearly associated with eachother and happen fairly often.

 

[Bobsican]

Good point, however, we should at least have the most basic ones around.

It can also just be named instead "Non-Serious Battle", by the way. In fact, I´ll go ahead and change the name of it in the OP.

 

[Darkmon_cns]

I'm fine with bob's idea

 

[Antvasima]

I think that all of the suggestions seem fine, except for "Power Revisions", as that is not what the F&G board is for.

Should I ask the Fandom staff to add them as topics?

 

[Darkmon_cns]

But a question should be asked, would it be ok to tag the pages on these non serious battles? It should probably be made clear with the category's discrption.

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

I think these tags seem fine.

 

[Yobo_Blue]

What is the current list then?

 

[Bobsican]

I think that all of the suggestions seem fine, except for "Power Revisions", as that is not what the F&G board is for.
Should I ask the Fandom staff to add them as topics?

"Power Revisions" and "Hax Revisions" were more meant for actual threads for the wiki, so such topics get a degree of highlight, as the Content Revision board is often with a bunch of other things. As for the question, not yet, I have a feeling some more discussion is needed, just to make sure.

 

[Bobsican]

What is the current list then?

Basically what´s at the OP pretty much at this point.

 

[Almighty_cat_of_doom]

If any of them should be added, then I think it would be Off-topic.

Else I agree more or less with OP.

 

[Bobsican]

Bump.

 

[Antvasima]

So, should I ask about the following topics then?

Off-Topic

Friendly Discussion

Image Sharing

Role Playing

Joke Battles/Non-Serious Battles (The former sounds better, but may be confusing, as Ryukama mentioned.)

Other

I don't think that I should ask about the following topics, as content revision discussions should preferably simply add the main affected pages, and only 4 of them are allowed.

Hax Revisions

Power Revisions