• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Profile Deletion Requests Thread - 13

Status
Not open for further replies.
GojiBoyForever said:
Maybe Nemo should be prohibited from making profiles.
Click to expand...
Given Agnaa's analysis, this might actually be a good idea.

Still, do you think that we should tighten our regulations a bit regarding tools and toys Promestein? That way we at least have a clear precedent for this. Perhaps somebody could create a staff thread for this?
 
Anyway, would somebody be willing to create a staff thread for what I mentioned earlier?
 
The profile for The Foundatio is incomplete.

SCP is a huge verse with over 10,000 pages and so if I can tell that some obvious stuff was missed, then it's likely that a whole lot of stuff was missed in total.

From a quick glance I can see that Agent Michelle Yu isn't mentioned on the profile and her abilities aren't listed, Marion Wheeler's listed but her abilities aren't.

I would not be surprised if there were many dozens more abilities missing, just from the sheer volume of writing that seems to have been overlooked when making the page.

I asked Sir Oven about it and he said he thinks this is the bare minimum information needed to create a viable profile. So, are bare minimum profiles like this allowed?
 
The statistics come from proper statements, but making a CRT won't resolve (what I perceive to be) the core issue. That it's a profile for the main organization from a verse with over 10,000 pages, and neither me nor Oven has read all of them, meaning that we are guaranteed to be missing feats that belong there.

However, the feats that are there are accurate.

But I'm also not sure that this is an issue. If it's not, ignore this, but if it is, the page would need to be deleted.
 
I've discussed this with Agnaa off site and I'm currently compiling a list of changes and additions that should be made to the profile. As it's creator, I'm of course going to be against deleting it, but I'm not going to make a big fuss about it since I still have the code on my sandbox.

I'll be making a thread regarding the list of changes and additions sometime soon, but I honestly don't see a reason to delete the page since no profile is ever 100% complete on first launch.

That being said, I'll let the jury decide on the fate of the profile.
 
With something like SCP, there's no way to 'get it all right' on the first shot. Doubtlessly, things will be missed, and the best way to catch those things is to release it to the public and let them help catch your mistakes.
 
I thought we were purging sexual content. Look at the size of those honkers. Her name is literally Porno. If HuniePop gets the boot, why doesn't this?

I'm not talking about the verse in general, by the way. That seems fine. I'm just advocating for the deletion of this (literal) semon demon. And being here for a while isn't really an excuse if nobody's argued against it before.
 
Oh. Okay, my mistake.

My point still stands, though. There's plenty of hentai verses that have been nuked not named HuniePop. And I'm not talking about the entire verse, just this one character. I mean, look at the picture for Christ's sake. Could nobody find a better one that doesn't have her boobs saying "BOING BOING" to the side?
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Porno Diane has been here since 2015 lol
Click to expand...
Okay? And has nobody ever thought once "Hey, maybe this isn't really work safe, and we shouldn't have this on the wiki?" Some things don't get better with age. This is one of them.
 
Regarding Miss Porno, it all comes down to-

Can you research and look into this character in a (relatively) SFW way?

So, can one research Porno Diane in a safe manner?
 
We allow all characters in a verse for content ratings, we don't single out single characters from an acceptable verse.
 
Agnaa said:
We allow all characters in a verse for content ratings, we don't single out single characters from an acceptable verse.
Click to expand...
Well, why not?

What's coming to mind is the Navaverse. It was the weird monstrosity of a creation wrought by some Internet pest named Moleman9000. Anyways, he caught a lot of flack for explicit rape scenes and depictions in there. His response was something along the lines of "Well, it's not that bad. I only have like, three tentacle rape monsters."

Well, Bastard isn't that bad. It only has like, one big titty hentai succubus.
 
Who cares if there's a "big titty hentai succubus"? Having big **** does not make a profile banned, being a succubus does not make a profile banned.

And Bastard isn't a hentai series.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Jinx666
'Continuity' Section for Verse Pages
Replies
11
Views
1K
Jinx666
Jinx666
DMUA
Removing Power of the Verse from Verse pages
2 3
Replies
99
Views
6K
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
Armorchompy
  • Locked
Minor Team Profiles Change
2
Replies
42
Views
2K
Armorchompy
Armorchompy
Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
7 8 9
Replies
357
Views
21K
GarrixianXD
GarrixianXD
  • Locked
Regarding the Common Editing Mistakes Page
Replies
10
Views
768
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top