Question about Zoro

[LIFE_OF_KING]

So I decided to read some Zoro's fights, and realized that most people consider his common attacks to ignore durability. So far so good, the problem is, if we consider that most attacks are not AP why is Zoro beating opponents with a single attack considered an AP feat then?

 

[LordGinSama]

Zoro doesn't have durability negation, your talking about Goken which is similar in nature in terms of lethality.

 

[SemiRaedi]

^

 

[LIFE_OF_KING]

So why do people say about "ignoring durability" in Zoro's attacks? Like here. The main reason he wins is for a hax (?)

 

[LordGinSama]

That was made whenever Goken was considered to be Durability Negation, as opposed to being Information Analysis that attacks any weak points he'll find. It doesn't change that particular match, since he's dealing with flesh so the lethality of his attacks there would be identical to Durability Negation.

 

[LIFE_OF_KING]

So in the end it's not AP?

 

[LordGinSama]

So in the end it's not AP?

Yes and no, he still cuts without relying on his sheer physical prowess but he still has blatant limits so it can't be considered as Durability Negation. He just gets around all of that via sensing the speed and angle of which he should cut at.

 

[MonkeyOfLife]

That was made whenever Goken was considered to be Durability Negation

Don't think it was
actually I'm dumb... Thought it was Zoro vs katakuri

 

[Rez]

actually I'm dumb...

Monkey accepting that humans are superior to apes now that's rare

 

[MonkeyOfLife]

Monkey accepting that humans are superior to apes now that's rare

This comment proves the opposite