• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports - 34

Status
Not open for further replies.
But the majority here agree to ban Fire again.

I'm myself feels he need get a chance,but seeing the majority agree to ban him again well....
 
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2046108#354

I think Maxnumb is trolling at this point. He continues to quote large bodies of text, even adding his own response in it even after being warned not to do so.

He also thinks an ability that blatantly involves stealing physical power is hax. Even after that was proven to be otherwise multiple times. Granted I was not behaving well in that thread, so I guess I'm reporting myself too.
 
@Versus it's good that you were honest that you did'nt behave well but, as for that guy I think another heavier warning would be fine.
 
Some staff member should probably give him a light warning with instructions then.
 
I agree with Agnaa, I do not want Fire banned if it is just a misunderstanding. But just to clarify, it is not the dialogue that I was mainly focused on. We were arguing about visual effects and context, so the way he edited it looked like it would have been 2 different panels and leaves out the fact that time was no longer erased among other things. I would hope it was not his intention, but given what we were arguing about, it is suspicious. I agree with not banning him, however
 
Yeah, it's likely not her. Otherwise she would've just been more hostile to anyone who disagrees with her.
 
True but to be fair the name and how it looks is very similar to Asukas. Particularly the same under-score spacing in the same spots.

But take that with a grain of salt.
 
That name refers to a character in Seven Knights (her avi)

Unlike Asuka's own name which is made up

Don't believe her to be a sock

There's no point to talk about her for now since unlike asuka's, her name is a reference to a series, acts differently and politely. Plus, she came to chat once, and that was before she edited or anything (And Asuka was not banned during that time)
 
Differences between the two.

Rin has a The with the "T" capital while Asuka has the with the "t" in lowercase

Rin is much more polite while Asuka is down right rude(according to my experiences)

Rin has a name stolen from a fictional verse while Asuka has a made up name.

Similarities

The both are emperoreses of 2 deadly creatures.
 
ZackMoon1234 said:
You technically can, especially if the one you're arguing for has no supports other than you
Although your own vote will not count
^This

Either way, I have reopned said thread.
 
I restored the thread. If it gets out of hand, you can report here to get it closed.

EDIT: Ninja'd by Dragon

EDIT: Well he did remove it again after Dragon reopened it.
 
Theglassman12 said:
On a different topic, does anyone here know how this whole "10 edit requirement" stuff works? Cause there's people in the discussion forum confused AF on how they're supposed to get into the wiki.
It seems like Fandom considered it best to close the wiki from new accounts for the time being, presumably until things calm down considerably.
 
Well, given that the relentless harrassment has involved a massive amount of death and rape threats, genocide endorsements, disgusting **** and gore, extreme vandalism, and even child pornography, and that a police investigation will likely open soon, it seems like Fandom considers it as a less bad option to temporarily close the wiki from new accounts until they get information regarding what to do from the authorities.

However, I obviously do not like that innocent new members will not be able to join the wiki for the time being either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top