• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Setting Standard Sizes for Pocket Dimensions

Status
Not open for further replies.

GarrixianXD

University Enthusiast
Any/All
VS Battles
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
3,163
7,801
The purpose of this thread is to create standards for sub-space and pocket reality sizes, as we know they're smaller than a universe but with an unspecified size, but the lack of clarity on its size really brings confusion in certain discussions.

My proposal is to set the size of pocket dimensions to the size they're visually represented. For example: if realms are depicted to contain the Earth and skies, as well as having a sun then the size of it should be set to be at least having the volume to contain our Sun and Earth. Unless it is explicitly stated or represented to be significantly bigger or smaller, otherwise.

This rule will only apply to pocket realms that have a blatant visualisation of what it represents and gives a hint of the minimum size of it. (e.g. Sub-space from Genshin Impact would fall into this application since we can see it contains a sun and an Earth. However, the Infinity Castle from Demon Slayer would not because of its complexity, which is difficult to visualise its extent due to its incongruous nature)
 
We already had a lengthy discussion years ago, but the conclusion was that we do consider what's already in it to judge a minimum; it contains a sun if we see a sun, it contains many solar systems if there is a starry sky. We consider 3-B a minimum if more than one galaxy is visible or if there's a starry sky + the Tetra Galaxy being visible.
 
We already had a lengthy discussion years ago, but the conclusion was that we do consider what's already in it to judge a minimum; it contains a sun if we see a sun, it contains many solar systems if there is a starry sky. We consider 3-B a minimum if more than one galaxy is visible or if there's a starry sky + the Tetra Galaxy being visible.
Ah, so the standards are already applied?
 
Yeah, pretty sure they were. There's obviously exceptions such as the concept of illusions/genjutsu stuff, but not a standard assumption unless specified.
 
Yeah, pretty sure they were. There's obviously exceptions such as the concept of illusions/genjutsu stuff, but not a standard assumption unless specified.
Thanks for clarifying, should this be closed then?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top