TheGreatJedi13
Username Only- 5,084
- 3,227
Hello.
I'm mostly here regarding the effect of platonic concept if done correctly.
As currently in the wiki independence from the physicality of things or the concept where object participates in is enough for type 1. But there are cases where in as said it doesn't fully follow the philosophy of Platonic concept in a way that they are independent but do not exhibit nor show nature as explained such as (a perfect whole to be reached or achieved. Or neoplatonism and some such)
As now we stopped using platonic and false platonic to determine concept types but carries on some key things like independence from the physicality (theory of forms). Or whatever object is governs. Such as why it is possible for reality to exist first before a certain type 1 comes into existence as long as it is fully established to be completely unaffected by the object it governs etc while also fundamentally governing reality.
Would an argument of true Platonic concept be listed as ontological difference (1-A or something) be included on ways to achieve it. And would concept types remain the same but a true Platonic concept wouldn't just be type 1 but also has tiers for it?
Take note this is for those that fully abides by the philosophy and was described/shown to be and not flimsy verse specific interpretations of it that is limited only to what they take away or make inspiration from the original philosophy.
Edit: another question
Since BDE type 2 will get a pruning on profiles does affected profiles can be argued further to include more necessary details that might actually make them qualify?
I'm mostly here regarding the effect of platonic concept if done correctly.
As currently in the wiki independence from the physicality of things or the concept where object participates in is enough for type 1. But there are cases where in as said it doesn't fully follow the philosophy of Platonic concept in a way that they are independent but do not exhibit nor show nature as explained such as (a perfect whole to be reached or achieved. Or neoplatonism and some such)
As now we stopped using platonic and false platonic to determine concept types but carries on some key things like independence from the physicality (theory of forms). Or whatever object is governs. Such as why it is possible for reality to exist first before a certain type 1 comes into existence as long as it is fully established to be completely unaffected by the object it governs etc while also fundamentally governing reality.
Would an argument of true Platonic concept be listed as ontological difference (1-A or something) be included on ways to achieve it. And would concept types remain the same but a true Platonic concept wouldn't just be type 1 but also has tiers for it?
Take note this is for those that fully abides by the philosophy and was described/shown to be and not flimsy verse specific interpretations of it that is limited only to what they take away or make inspiration from the original philosophy.
Edit: another question
Since BDE type 2 will get a pruning on profiles does affected profiles can be argued further to include more necessary details that might actually make them qualify?
Last edited: