• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Problems With Tier 0 (Staff Only)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, that is correct, and preferably in a manner that is easy for our visitors to understand.
 
So should we go ahead with what we currently have, and start the tiers High 1-A and 0 revisions in the meantime?
 
Hmm. Still nothing. What do the rest of you think? Should we apply what we have now to the Tiering System page, and update the Striking Strength, and Durability pages, along with all of the current tier 0 and High 1-A profiles, and then wait for DarkLK, Sera, and Azathoth to possibly improve on the definition text later?
 
Since they're taking pretty long, I think we could just go ahead and if they have better ideas to make improvements, they can do that later if everyone else is okay with that.
 
Andytrenom said:
Did we ever message Dark, Azzy or Sera to reply again here?
Click to expand...
I think that I asked Azathoth, but you can politely ask the others if they are interested in helping out as well.
 
DarkDragonMedeus said:
Since they're taking pretty long, I think we could just go ahead and if they have better ideas to make improvements, they can do that later if everyone else is okay with that.
Click to expand...
Pretty much.
 
@Matthew

Okay. If I update the Tiering System and other statistics pages, would you be willing to handle the tier 0 and High 1-A profiles afterwards?
 
Also, can somebody write a list of all the High 1-A pages?
 
I'll gather the list of High 1-A characters that need to be checked; but might take a while. As for the revisions, you can begin when ready, just try not to get overworked. As for anyone else willing to help, that would also be appreciated.
 
Well, I'm still looking through them, but so far, that might actually be right.
 
Okay, I can confirm it; Phoenix is wright. Those are the only 5 High 1-A characters.
 
Okay. Thanks. I am currently updating all of them.
 
Wokistan said:
"Dear VSBW, if Matt's suggestion is so great, then why did my wife leave me and take the kids?"
Click to expand...
Because Matt suggested it and your wife said "great"
 
Well, we don't really consider anyone totally invulnerable, just as we don't consider anyone omnipotent.
 
"It is not allowed to create versus matches for tier 0 or High 1-A characters, as they are impossible to exactly evaluate, which turns any results inconclusive."

^ Now that High 1-A and 0 have been condensed into one tier, how are we going to change this rule?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Ultima_Reality
  • Locked
Tiering System Revisions: Tier 0
5 6 7
Replies
251
Views
79K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Finiznot
  • Locked
Tier 10-B to 9-B Gap Revision
Replies
20
Views
1K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Fwyzzverse
  • Locked
Revisions (Tiering System) : Tier 2
Replies
10
Views
3K
Fwyzzverse
Fwyzzverse
Epyriel
Tier 5 Revision
2 3
Replies
104
Views
8K
IdiosyncraticLawyer
IdiosyncraticLawyer
IdiosyncraticLawyer
  • Locked
Clarifying the number of staff necessary to approve Tier 1 and 0 revisions
2
Replies
67
Views
4K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top