- 1,171
- 967
Wouldn't that imply that 4th dimensional space is actually 5+1D?The Tesseract shows that universes/dreams can contain a fourth axis
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wouldn't that imply that 4th dimensional space is actually 5+1D?The Tesseract shows that universes/dreams can contain a fourth axis
How many staff disagreements we need until thread is closed? We are at 4 now.Let's wait for a few more staff votes.
So far...
Agree: 0
Disagree: 3 - Dalesean, Qawsedf, Maverick
Neutral: 1 - DarkDragonMedeus
Definitely have enough to start the 48 hour grace period now.How many staff disagreements we need until thread is closed? We are at 4 now.
doesnt grace only apply to approving a threadDefinitely have enough to start the 48 hour grace period now.
The timelines are only infinitely large on a 4D scale, which is why they can be separated with a small 5D axis. In this case, it's a 4D space of infinite size (so Low 2-C), repeated an uncountable infinite number of times due to a time axis which requires a 5D space to contain it.Second one is irrelevant since a 2-A structure is an infinite structure containing an infinite amount of infinitely large timelines but still has an insignificant 4th spatial dimension.
Yes, I said as much. We've regularly accepted a tesseract (when shown to be sufficiently real) as evidence for four spatial axis.it's a tesseract
I read it as both waysdoesnt grace only apply to approving a thread
Its to allow enough time for everyone to comment on the thread and voice their opinion. No one wants a FRA train to just bulldoze revisions.For content revision suggestions, generally, a standard grace period of 48 hours should be allowed for the reviewing staff members to evaluate and approve them. However, in the case of extremely blatant, self-evident revisions, a grace period of 24 hours is acceptable. Until this grace period has elapsed, since the time of the thread's creation, the revision should not be applied to the profiles.
I'm sorry if I'm misunderstanding, but, I'm not sure why it would be referred to as "Universe Number 4". Fourth Dimension Space is the 5th map in Sonic Shuffle anyway, and isn't the 4th one played in the story mode.It can also mean fourth dimension as in "fourth universe" (like in Phineas and Ferb or Doom). That's actually what is hinted by this translation here. The "4th dimension" is a "world."
The "fourth-dimensional space" translation comes solely from a DeepL MTL.
Also, even if it did have a fifth dimensional axis there is no proof that its extent is "non-insignificant."
Well, not right now cuz it’s just 4 spatial dimensions+time. I have been considering upgrading MW specifically to be 5+1D due to aleph-1 amount of dream worlds but I’m waiting on Crossworlds.Wouldn't that imply that 4th dimensional space is actually 5+1D?
Pretty sure rejected threads have no grace period. Dread tried something, but prior staff rejected it on the account of it being too problematic on dragging threads out.Definitely have enough to start the 48 hour grace period now.
Pretty sure the Eggfield was never touched upon by this revisionJust so we can clarify, did all the staff vote to keep 5-D altogether, or mainly to keep it on Maginaryworld and ignored the other stuff. Cuz there’s 3 5-D constructs currently.
All I know is that the staff that voted disagree all disagreed entirely with OPJust so we can clarify, did all the staff vote to keep 5-D altogether, or mainly to keep it on Maginaryworld and ignored the other stuff. Cuz there’s 3 5-D constructs currently.
What do you mean by "sufficiently real"? There's no evidence that it's actually a tesseract besides its resemblance to the 3D model of a small portion of a tesseract. No statements, no movement or rotation, nothing.Yes, I said as much. We've regularly accepted a tesseract (when shown to be sufficiently real) as evidence for four spatial axis.
A 2-A multiverse as a whole is still an infinitely large 5D space. You do realize that, right? Yet it is still Tier 2. I am not talking about the timelines, I am specifically talking about the multiverse as a whole. A 2-A multiverse is an infinitely large 5D structure with an insignificant 5th dimension. 4th dimension space in Sonic is no different.The timelines are only infinitely large on a 4D scale, which is why they can be separated with a small 5D axis. In this case, it's a 4D space of infinite size (so Low 2-C), repeated an uncountable infinite number of times due to a time axis which requires a 5D space to contain it.
To keep all of 5D iirc.Just so we can clarify, did all the staff vote to keep 5-D altogether, or mainly to keep it on Maginaryworld and ignored the other stuff. Cuz there’s 3 5-D constructs currently.
Sometimes they're like, illusions or contradict the established cosmology.What do you mean by "sufficiently real"?
On the wiki, a 2-A multiverse is an infinite series of 4-D spaces separated by an insignificant 5th-dimensional axis. But, those spaces are 3D+1 and not 4D+1. A 4D+1 space is an uncountable infinite number of fourth-dimensional snapshots, which makes that space Low 1-C. It's the same reason why a normal universe is Low 2-C, but instead of being 3-A repeated an uncountable infinite number of times, it's Low 2-C repeated an uncountable infinite number of times.A 2-A multiverse as a whole is still an infinitely large 5D space.
Is there any rule against someone spamming downgrade threads back to back (especially if they keep failing)? I know there's one for upgrades.I have a feeling OP has got a 3rd Debunk thread for Sonic. Neutral for now
only if its constant repeats in a short timeframe. nothing really rule breaking about putting out uniquely different downgrades that get rejected.Is there any rule against someone spamming downgrade threads back to back (especially if they keep failing)? I know there's one for upgrades.
Well, we don't just assume that all 4 spatial dimensions of a 4D+1 space are significant. So I guess you're assuming that because of the "tesseract" right? You and the other staff don't seem to want to budge on the tesseract, but I've got to ask this: What is the minimum threshold for counting as "significant"? Does the extra dimension just have to not be infinitesimal or unfathomably tiny?A 4D+1 space is an uncountable infinite number of fourth-dimensional snapshots, which makes that space Low 1-C.
Forgot Glass.Agree: 0
Disagree: 4 - Qawsedf, Maverick, Dalesean, Elizhaa
Neutral: 1 - DarkDragonMedeus
Yeah really not sure what we have left to do here.
Must've posted after I made the 3 disagree vote count list. Added.Forgot Glass.
See yall guys in Deactivating Sonic Cosmology Downgrade Part 3Must've posted after I made the 3 disagree vote count list. Added.
Agree: 0
Disagree: 5 - Qawsedf, Maverick, Dalesean, Elizhaa, Theglassman12
Neutral: 1 - DarkDragonMedeus
Yeah this thread is cooked. Someone should close this.
See yall guys in Deactivating Sonic Cosmology Downgrade Part 3
While this is closed, to answer this question its not because of the Tesseract. The Tesseract proves that there are four spatial dimensions for dreams, and you have realms that can contain dreams that themselves are infinite in size. The Tesseract is just one piece of evidence in a series of evidence for larger dream spaces to be infinite in size.So I guess you're assuming that because of the "tesseract" right?