• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Deactivating Anti-Space-Time attack mechanism limiter... | Sonic Cosmology Downgrade Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Second one is irrelevant since a 2-A structure is an infinite structure containing an infinite amount of infinitely large timelines but still has an insignificant 4th spatial dimension.
The timelines are only infinitely large on a 4D scale, which is why they can be separated with a small 5D axis. In this case, it's a 4D space of infinite size (so Low 2-C), repeated an uncountable infinite number of times due to a time axis which requires a 5D space to contain it.
it's a tesseract
Yes, I said as much. We've regularly accepted a tesseract (when shown to be sufficiently real) as evidence for four spatial axis.
 
doesnt grace only apply to approving a thread
I read it as both ways
For content revision suggestions, generally, a standard grace period of 48 hours should be allowed for the reviewing staff members to evaluate and approve them. However, in the case of extremely blatant, self-evident revisions, a grace period of 24 hours is acceptable. Until this grace period has elapsed, since the time of the thread's creation, the revision should not be applied to the profiles.
Its to allow enough time for everyone to comment on the thread and voice their opinion. No one wants a FRA train to just bulldoze revisions.
 
It can also mean fourth dimension as in "fourth universe" (like in Phineas and Ferb or Doom). That's actually what is hinted by this translation here. The "4th dimension" is a "world."

The "fourth-dimensional space" translation comes solely from a DeepL MTL.

Also, even if it did have a fifth dimensional axis there is no proof that its extent is "non-insignificant."
I'm sorry if I'm misunderstanding, but, I'm not sure why it would be referred to as "Universe Number 4". Fourth Dimension Space is the 5th map in Sonic Shuffle anyway, and isn't the 4th one played in the story mode.

Edit: I'm sorry, this was already touched upon.
 
Last edited:
Wouldn't that imply that 4th dimensional space is actually 5+1D?
Well, not right now cuz it’s just 4 spatial dimensions+time. I have been considering upgrading MW specifically to be 5+1D due to aleph-1 amount of dream worlds but I’m waiting on Crossworlds.
 
Definitely have enough to start the 48 hour grace period now.
Pretty sure rejected threads have no grace period. Dread tried something, but prior staff rejected it on the account of it being too problematic on dragging threads out.

 
Just so we can clarify, did all the staff vote to keep 5-D altogether, or mainly to keep it on Maginaryworld and ignored the other stuff. Cuz there’s 3 5-D constructs currently.
 
Just so we can clarify, did all the staff vote to keep 5-D altogether, or mainly to keep it on Maginaryworld and ignored the other stuff. Cuz there’s 3 5-D constructs currently.
All I know is that the staff that voted disagree all disagreed entirely with OP

EDIT: Seems like Omega is right. Eggfield doesn't seem to have been touched.
 
Yes, I said as much. We've regularly accepted a tesseract (when shown to be sufficiently real) as evidence for four spatial axis.
What do you mean by "sufficiently real"? There's no evidence that it's actually a tesseract besides its resemblance to the 3D model of a small portion of a tesseract. No statements, no movement or rotation, nothing.
The timelines are only infinitely large on a 4D scale, which is why they can be separated with a small 5D axis. In this case, it's a 4D space of infinite size (so Low 2-C), repeated an uncountable infinite number of times due to a time axis which requires a 5D space to contain it.
A 2-A multiverse as a whole is still an infinitely large 5D space. You do realize that, right? Yet it is still Tier 2. I am not talking about the timelines, I am specifically talking about the multiverse as a whole. A 2-A multiverse is an infinitely large 5D structure with an insignificant 5th dimension. 4th dimension space in Sonic is no different.
 
What do you mean by "sufficiently real"?
Sometimes they're like, illusions or contradict the established cosmology.
A 2-A multiverse as a whole is still an infinitely large 5D space.
On the wiki, a 2-A multiverse is an infinite series of 4-D spaces separated by an insignificant 5th-dimensional axis. But, those spaces are 3D+1 and not 4D+1. A 4D+1 space is an uncountable infinite number of fourth-dimensional snapshots, which makes that space Low 1-C. It's the same reason why a normal universe is Low 2-C, but instead of being 3-A repeated an uncountable infinite number of times, it's Low 2-C repeated an uncountable infinite number of times.
 
A 4D+1 space is an uncountable infinite number of fourth-dimensional snapshots, which makes that space Low 1-C.
Well, we don't just assume that all 4 spatial dimensions of a 4D+1 space are significant. So I guess you're assuming that because of the "tesseract" right? You and the other staff don't seem to want to budge on the tesseract, but I've got to ask this: What is the minimum threshold for counting as "significant"? Does the extra dimension just have to not be infinitesimal or unfathomably tiny?

Also, can we at least clean up the cosmology blog to make the justification for 5D more concise?
 
Agree: 0

Disagree: 4 - Qawsedf, Maverick, Dalesean, Elizhaa

Neutral: 1 - DarkDragonMedeus

Yeah really not sure what we have left to do here.
 
If I'm not wrong, the realm which contains 4-D space is infinite in size which grants the 4 axis significant length right?
 
Seems like the situation has resolved itself.

Anyways, disagree FRA.
 
So I guess you're assuming that because of the "tesseract" right?
While this is closed, to answer this question its not because of the Tesseract. The Tesseract proves that there are four spatial dimensions for dreams, and you have realms that can contain dreams that themselves are infinite in size. The Tesseract is just one piece of evidence in a series of evidence for larger dream spaces to be infinite in size.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top