Spinoirr
He/Him- 17,748
- 10,396
Dragon Ball Super scaling is ridiculous lolCanon low 1-C Krillin before GTA 6 yo![]()
![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dragon Ball Super scaling is ridiculous lolCanon low 1-C Krillin before GTA 6 yo![]()
![]()
Understandable, RIPAlthough I am familiar with Dragon Ball & Super, I am not experienced with higher dimensional stuff, & this seems like an intense topic.
Also, I am quite sleepy at this time.
Apologies.
Hell yeah
If I understand Qaw correctly his stance was that Infinite Zamasu began as 2-C but by the time he reached Goku's timeline he had become Low 1-C. So ToP god tiers onwards would be outright Low 1-C via scaling above IZ's energy.So we have Goku and others as Low 1-C or 2-C up to Low 1-C?
PeakIf I understand Qaw correctly his stance was that Infinite Zamasu began as 2-C but by the time he reached Goku's timeline he had become Low 1-C. So ToP god tiers onwards would be outright Low 1-C via scaling above IZ's energy.
I had this on the back of my mind reading this thread but my brain literally refused the idea so hard the actual line of thought was erasedSo ToP god tiers onwards would be outright Low 1-C via scaling above IZ's energy.
1-C Yamcha when? My GOAT needs his respect
I suppose 'eventually' would imply he didn't actually reach Low 1-C but could have. Whereas 'up to' means he did achieve Low 1-C status but it wasn't immediate.What is the difference between "eventually" and "up to"?
Nothing in the narrative contradicts the notion.I had this on the back of my mind reading this thread but my brain literally refused the idea so hard the actual line of thought was erased
Also, as I saw, OP is using narrative here, are we sure that the narrative (T.O.P specifically) support the idea of multiple l1cs?
Best as I see it, this is IZ and IZ alone, if zeno cant stopped it in time, everyone's cooked.
AgreedAlso I think this needs more staff approval given it's Dragon Ball.
Not from me though
Not from me though
Assuming the logic behind them being beyond IZ's energy holds up. Just being stronger than IZ at some point isn't the same as being stronger than him after breaching the current timeline's time stream.If I understand Qaw correctly his stance was that Infinite Zamasu began as 2-C but by the time he reached Goku's timeline he had become Low 1-C. So ToP god tiers onwards would be outright Low 1-C via scaling above IZ's energy.
Viet addressed this in the previous page I believe.why is this AP anyway instead of ED or just HDE.
Yeah, Jiren is the strongest. It's stated by multiple characters that Jiren is indeed the mightiest enemy they have ever gone up against in terms of power. Even Beerus, the same person who sensed Zamasu's energy and deduced that he was messing with time was absolutely shook by Jiren's energy. Way more than he ever was with Zamasu. Jiren scaling above is just thrown in our faces to be honest.Assuming the logic behind them being beyond IZ's energy holds up. Just being stronger than IZ at some point isn't the same as being stronger than him after breaching the current timeline's time stream.
i'm going to make one and only reply to you, if a character fused with the entirety of the structure, they get both HDE and AP if the structure was tiered, so what you mentioned was a completely wrong presentation of the standard. HDE =/= AP only applicable in case the HDE themselves possesses non-significant dimensions, if the dimensions are significant and can be tiered, HDE = AP, now i hope this answer your question and please, don't derail the thread anymore
why is this AP anyway instead of ED or just HDE.
That just makes it worse...I mean it could hardly be ED, nothing got D’d
Meaning, we currently have 0 staff accepting anyone scaling from it, and 4 staff who think "He would eventually be Low 1C.Maybe I'm missing something but the feat reads more as "2-C, would eventually become Low 1-C" than what's currently being suggested.
Additionally scaling everyone to IZ's energy makes sense for the 2-C scaling, but not Low 1-C if he never achieved it.
What are you on about? Where In the vote tally op mentioned that the scaling is accepted the original purpose of this thread was to make zamasu low 1c which is what staff accepted atleast qaw and vieth accepted with the upto low 1c rating and DDM agreed with qaw given qaw never changed his stance and just explained it to vieth further.Something worth noting is that all the staff who have "agreed" with the proposal did so with this intent
Meaning, we currently have 0 staff accepting anyone scaling from it, and 4 staff who think "He would eventually be Low 1C.
So yeah, the vote tally looks a bit deceiving, but not intentional or rule-breaking (Malicious).
Something worth noting is that all the staff who have "agreed" with the proposal did so with this intent
Meaning, we currently have 0 staff accepting anyone scaling from it, and 4 staff who think "He would eventually be Low 1C.
So yeah, the vote tally looks a bit deceiving, but not intentional or rule-breaking (Malicious).
What are you on about? Where In the vote tally op mentioned that the scaling is accepted the original purpose of this thread was to make zamasu low 1c which is what staff accepted atleast qaw and vieth accepted with the upto low 1c rating and DDM agreed with qaw given qaw never changed his stance and just explained it to vieth further.
Scaling is something that was brought up on the thread because of the new rule which is currently an ongoing discussion
Please read the message pointed by Ronin thank you qaw himself said upto low 1c is better than eventually"2-C, up to Low 1-C" (Which is what the OP is suggesting as of the last edit) is very different from "2-C, would eventually become Low 1-C", especially in the context of knowing there was an intended scaling thread in the future.
Please read the message pointed by Ronin thank you qaw himself said upto low 1c is better than eventually
I was doing it under the assumption that the AP upgrade happened semk-quickly. If Chariot is right then it would just be my original proposal of "Eventually Low 1-C" that no one scales to.Qaw did sure, but they aren't DDM or the other staff.
Which part of what Chariot said? Please elaborate.I was doing it under the assumption that the AP upgrade happened semk-quickly. If Chariot is right then it would just be my original proposal of "Eventually Low 1-C" that no one scales to.
Qaw, I honestly don't understand what is going on here. Why are you deferring to Chariot when Vietthai already pointed out what was wrong with the argument? And I already proved Zamasu's energy was effecting time itself as per the statements, even disregarding his literal energy transcending the boundaries of the timeline, and merging with it entirely. Whis literally says it's an energy along with Beerus. It's AP. That's what the big bolded paragraph I wrote mentions and clarifies. You yourself already agreed with the notion of Zamasu becoming Low 1-C when he reached the present timeline. You said that to Vietthai. So again, by your own admission, It's still just Low 1-C and the following characters we stated still scale. We agreed that "up to Low 1-C" seems the most appropriate. There is no "eventually" anymore.I was doing it under the assumption that the AP upgrade happened semk-quickly. If Chariot is right then it would just be my original proposal of "Eventually Low 1-C" that no one scales to.
I was making a reference in that jokepost, not an actual argument lol. There was no malice intended.What? It's not almost Low 1C, it's up to Low 1C. And what arguments did they make that you agree with?
For all the accusations of this being a steath upgrade, I'm seeing a lot of stealth disagrees where nobody has actually constructed an argument for why they disagree so the people who want to disagree can only vaguely gesture to others they think are disagreeing.
It's hard to see it as nonsense when you still haven’t been specific with which points of theirs you agree with. You said their points make sense. What points?I was making a reference in that jokepost, not an actual argument lol. There was no malice intended.
And like I said, I think their points make sense. You implying that I'm "stealth disagreeing" is straight nonsense. I simply want to see where others agree and disagree and come to my own conclusions afterwards. In other words, I am currently neutral.
It's hard to see it as nonsense when you still haven’t been specific with which points of theirs you agree with. You said their points make sense. What points?