- 547
- 272
HI
first of all, I intend to remove Kirin being lightspeed. Its current justification is based on the multiple statements claiming it to be SOL in the Databook, which tends to make exaggerated statements, like this. This is a case of cherry-picking, just as it is repeatedly stated to be SOL, it is also said many times to be lightning. Raiton, which Kirin falls under, is accepted as lightning and moves at the same speed (there’s even a calc. on the page). The ninjutsu databook page calls it lightning, without mentioning light.
From the fight between Sasuke and Itachi (and from the jutsu profile linked), we know that the technique wasn't directly created by Sasuke but by his fire jutsu, which heated the air in the sky and generated a thundercloud. Zetsu explains that the technique doesn't require chakra to be created, but rather requires control over lightning and the atmosphere. He also directly gives us a specific timeframe. But aside from that, Zetsu applies this reasoning by referring to Kirin as natural lightning. In the manga which I recall being the primary source of information it is repeatedly referred to as lightning, or lightning descending from the clouds.
Kirin is based on a natural meteorological phenomenon; the Databook statements in this case are mere exaggerations.
This wasn’t mentioned in the previous threads, and the calculation is still present on the page, but the profiles have scaling chains that lead nowhere, and it’s not listed on Madara’s page.
agree with all proposals : @Zefra3011, @Saqphire, @AyOgUyS
agree with Kirin and neutral on light fang : @Damage3245, @BeTheWay1rst, @Qawsedf234, @CryoTheMayo, @M3X_2.0
agree with light fang and neutral on Kirin
disagree : @Testarossa002, @DavidTPPM, @HelloThere1089, @Godernet, @AlternativePrinciple
first of all, I intend to remove Kirin being lightspeed. Its current justification is based on the multiple statements claiming it to be SOL in the Databook, which tends to make exaggerated statements, like this. This is a case of cherry-picking, just as it is repeatedly stated to be SOL, it is also said many times to be lightning. Raiton, which Kirin falls under, is accepted as lightning and moves at the same speed (there’s even a calc. on the page). The ninjutsu databook page calls it lightning, without mentioning light.
From the fight between Sasuke and Itachi (and from the jutsu profile linked), we know that the technique wasn't directly created by Sasuke but by his fire jutsu, which heated the air in the sky and generated a thundercloud. Zetsu explains that the technique doesn't require chakra to be created, but rather requires control over lightning and the atmosphere. He also directly gives us a specific timeframe. But aside from that, Zetsu applies this reasoning by referring to Kirin as natural lightning. In the manga which I recall being the primary source of information it is repeatedly referred to as lightning, or lightning descending from the clouds.
Kirin is based on a natural meteorological phenomenon; the Databook statements in this case are mere exaggerations.
Kirin is stated by Zetsu and Sasuke to be impossible to dodge or block, on par with Amaterasu. This should cause downscaling to PT1 (I’ll only mention these to avoid too much confusion). Considering this Sasuke’s speed, in the same time frame he can cover 20m. Other characters like Kiba, Temari, and others shinobi cover 20 m, 8 m and 34 m respectively. To prevent spam, I’ll clarify this right here. The comparison to Amaterasu is not about destructive range for several reasons:
1) Amaterasu is a technique known for its casting speed, not its area of effect.I tachi can't manipulate him
2)Sasuke is near to Itachi (Zetus too). My calc. gives an estimate idea of about 41 m. Sasuke emerges unharmed from the impact. The reference is therefore to speed, focusing the damage on the lightning strike itself, not the explosion. Anyone with durability similar to Itachi’s would have no issues with the technique unless hit directly.That is also explained on the databook page
3)Zetsu talks about a time-frame, he explicitly refers to speed.
For now, I can accept that some characters might be above this level. But a ninjutsu that Sasuke uses to defeat a ninja who’s already a top-tier since the first arc, when compared to Amaterasu, has to be something he considers at least extremely fast. The Part 1 ninjas shouldn’t stand a chance against this.The evaluations of PT1 are largely supported by calculations
1) Amaterasu is a technique known for its casting speed, not its area of effect.I tachi can't manipulate him
2)Sasuke is near to Itachi (Zetus too). My calc. gives an estimate idea of about 41 m. Sasuke emerges unharmed from the impact. The reference is therefore to speed, focusing the damage on the lightning strike itself, not the explosion. Anyone with durability similar to Itachi’s would have no issues with the technique unless hit directly.That is also explained on the databook page
3)Zetsu talks about a time-frame, he explicitly refers to speed.
For now, I can accept that some characters might be above this level. But a ninjutsu that Sasuke uses to defeat a ninja who’s already a top-tier since the first arc, when compared to Amaterasu, has to be something he considers at least extremely fast. The Part 1 ninjas shouldn’t stand a chance against this.The evaluations of PT1 are largely supported by calculations
This wasn’t mentioned in the previous threads, and the calculation is still present on the page, but the profiles have scaling chains that lead nowhere, and it’s not listed on Madara’s page.
I think this should be removed, as it doesn’t meet the current standards.
Some standard's that are used to show a beam doesn't behave like real light include:
- The beam behaves in a reasonably realistic way, such as reflecting off non-magical mirrors or refracting and diffusing through liquids and materials.
- The beam is stated to move at the speed of light by reliable sources.
- The beam is stated to be composed/consisting of photons or light itself, again by reliable sources.
- The beam originates from a real source of light, such as the Sun or the flash of a camera
- None of this is actually shown.
- The statement comes from the databook, which is secondary canon ,often contradictory or filled with exaggerations. like this
- No statements regarding this. The term “light,” besides often being used figuratively, can also refer to something luminous or shining.
- . The technique doesn’t originate from a natural light source, but from the user’s mouth.
Some standard's that are used to show a beam doesn't behave like real light include:
- The beam primarily deals damage by means other than heating materials that absorb it.
- The beam is tangible and can be physically interacted with by normal humans, as if it were a solid, liquid, or gas. It shouldn’t disperse when struck like a substance would, and it shouldn’t be redirected without a mechanism such as refraction.
- The Light Fang cuts Naruto’s staff in half and was clearly intended to cause damage. The databook itself states that it can cut things.
- Since it’s an attack technique, it’s reasonable to assume that it’s tangible and can damage regular shinobi or physical beings.
- Justifications such as “it travels in a straight line” are not valid evidence in support, according to the standards page, which states:
There are two standards against it versus one that doesn’t seem valid to me.“Please note that the opposite of these criteria do not prove a beam is at lightspeed, merely that it could be.”
It should still be removed, as Madara moves it with his head.
The characters are currently accepted as being ten times faster; for anyone at his level, this is a ridiculous attack. It wouldn’t be a problem for anyone, and it’s hard to believe that Naruto would just stand still and watch such a slow attack until the last moment
agree with all proposals : @Zefra3011, @Saqphire, @AyOgUyS
agree with Kirin and neutral on light fang : @Damage3245, @BeTheWay1rst, @Qawsedf234, @CryoTheMayo, @M3X_2.0
agree with light fang and neutral on Kirin
disagree : @Testarossa002, @DavidTPPM, @HelloThere1089, @Godernet, @AlternativePrinciple
Last edited: