• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Pokemon: Creation Trio (& Others) Tier 1 Upgrade (ACCEPTED)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Low 1-C for that dimension between parallel universes is fine

1-C is not fine, evidence for that dimension between universes having its own time axis is lacking

1-C (6-D) for Arceus is fine, cause he just upscales i guess

Start at 10-D and end at 11-D

While scaling can be argued in a different thread, per rule you still need to list/mention who and what gonna get affected by this revision
 
Low 1-C for that dimension between parallel universes is fine

1-C is not fine, evidence for that dimension between universes having its own time axis is lacking

1-C (6-D) for Arceus is fine, cause he just upscales i guess

Oh yeah this was cleared up in the middle of the thread, I may have something for the time axis but I think another thread later on after im 100% sure on it would be better.

Though a small question id like to ask. Would the flow of time getting out of wack inside the dimension imply a time axis? Or is that not enough?

Start at 10-D and end at 11-D

While scaling can be argued in a different thread, per rule you still need to list/mentio who and what gonna get affected by this revision

Gotcha. I wasn't sure where High 1-C started at, thank you. And the scaling misunderstanding was cleared up mid-thread as well, we will handle it here.
 
Though a small question id like to ask. Would the flow of time getting out of wack inside the dimension imply a time axis? Or is that not enough?
No, time axis is always exist, it is a default thing, the issue isn't to prove there is time, but rather prove that the space between universes having its own time axis. You evidence just showing there is time, that is all, but that mostly didn't need to prove, that why i said you are lacking evidence. You need to prove that the time axis belong to only the space between universes and affect it only affect said space and not anything else
 
This is what's confusing for me too considering the other legendaries named here are not even ones im advocating to get this upgrade, and the one thing being argued to justify them having it is riddled with PIS.

Darkrai & Cresselia undoubtedly scale to this. We've had several discussions already in the past and Darkrai is consistently comparable to the Creation Trio. Even in the same movie he's blatantly around their level and capable of taking serious attacks from them for much of that fight.

If you go with the alternative that most Legendary scaling is PIS and those examples were discussed in the past, then at the very least you should add a note on the profiles that links back to those discussions.
I don’t know whether it’s been discussed before or not, so send links to those threads so I can read them.

There are also trainer profiles that, one way or another, scale from the Trio that you didn't mention in the OP:


There are also some examples of Pokémon that currently have a scaling chain regarding the creation trio:


I’m not really sure why the Pixies physically scale to the Creation Trio in the first place. The scans on the profile aren’t loading for me for some reason.

I think that would be a good starting point, doing a quick recap of what’s currently accepted so we have a baseline.
 
There are also trainer profiles that, one way or another, scale from the Trio that you didn't mention in the OP:

Fair enough. I will add those in.


There are also some examples of Pokémon that currently have a scaling chain regarding the creation trio:

Admittedly I did forget for a second we had these trainers scaling from the CT, so yeah thats fair to mention.
I’m not really sure why the Pixies physically scale to the Creation Trio in the first place. The scans on the profile aren’t loading for me for some reason.

If you mean the Lake Trio here, it was kinda already explained in the OP.
 
I haven't seen the Hoopa movie in a hot minute, but are the interactions there important to the plot? The way I'm hearing it, it seems like unlike the Darkrai interaction, which is pivotal and written as "holy shit these dudes are strong as **** we need to stop them NOW", the others are just like....one off things that don't really matter. Again, haven't seen it in a while, but if it is the case, I could see narrative intent being a line for whether Pokemon scale or not.
 
Fair enough. I will add those in.



Admittedly I did forget for a second we had these trainers scaling from the CT, so yeah thats fair to mention.


If you mean the Lake Trio here, it was kinda already explained in the OP.

Yeah but you should change the scans because the current one on the profiles don't load for some reason.
 
No, time axis is always exist, it is a default thing, the issue isn't to prove there is time, but rather prove that the space between universes having its own time axis. You evidence just showing there is time, that is all, but that mostly didn't need to prove, that why i said you are lacking evidence. You need to prove that the time axis belong to only the space between universes and affect it only affect said space and not anything else

I see. Not to pull a "whataboutism" moment, but just to help me understand, didn't you use Hit's use of time skip to help prove DBS's Neutral Space had a unique time axis? If so, would that not be the same case here? Or was there something else there that I misunderstood?
 
I haven't seen the Hoopa movie in a hot minute, but are the interactions there important to the plot? The way I'm hearing it, it seems like unlike the Darkrai interaction, which is pivotal and written as "holy shit these dudes are strong as **** we need to stop them NOW", the others are just like....one off things that don't really matter. Again, haven't seen it in a while, but if it is the case, I could see narrative intent being a line for whether Pokemon scale or not.

Yeah it's definitely not as essential to the plot as Darkrai fighting Dialga and Palkia is. The only plot pivotal thing is the legendaries being brought together for a battle free for all, but as far as which ones battle who and to what extent? They are arbitrarily one off things. And this is the only thing even hinting at these legendaries being able to scale to this extent.

Darkrai at least has more than just the anime demonstrating his comparative power to the creation trio as well.
 
Honestly, the way Johto Legendaries are scaled always seemed weird to me. I'll leave aside the beasts for the moment and focus on the relevant ones though.

Lugia fighting Hoopa is notable, especially when Hoopa tanked hits from other legendaries at the start while Lugia can fight him for real. Lugia also beats the protagonists in a fairly recent anime appearance. I can't help but think the arguments against Lugia and Ho-Oh scaling are either arguments from incredulity or just plain dismissal of the feats as inconsistencies, and meanwhile they seem to be some of the only Pokemon that don't get to scale based on any of their own battles.
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen the Hoopa movie in a hot minute, but are the interactions there important to the plot? The way I'm hearing it, it seems like unlike the Darkrai interaction, which is pivotal and written as "holy shit these dudes are strong as **** we need to stop them NOW", the others are just like....one off things that don't really matter. Again, haven't seen it in a while, but if it is the case, I could see narrative intent being a line for whether Pokemon scale or not.

Mega Rayquaza, Mega Latios, and Mega Latias are able to counter a combined outslaught from Kyurem, Primal Groudon, Primal Kyogre, and the Creation Trio, coming out of the attack unharmed. They’re also, on several occasions, able to trade direct blows with them, as absurd as that sounds.
 
I see. Not to pull a "whataboutism" moment, but just to help me understand, didn't you use Hit's use of time skip to help prove DBS's Neutral Space had a unique time axis? If so, would that not be the same case here? Or was there something else there that I misunderstood?
I already predict you gonna use this, but Hit time ability was skipping time to the future and the feat didn't affecting anything, even the macrocosms or the timeline. And we have Whis revert time of individual macrocosm only that macrocosm was reverted. All of this showing NS have its own unique time axis
 
Not allowed. Everyone that is affected by this need to be discussed on this very thread.
Tbf the Pokémon mentioned by Kukui in OP are already scaling from the Creation Trio in their profiles.

Kukui simply had no idea that others do as well, let's not talk about others that only POTENTIALLY do scale, especially when we have this:
So let's not try to talk about why the rating is wrong because "other Pokémon harm them!!!" when we have a rule against this roflmao.
 
Last edited:
I already predict you gonna use this, but Hit time ability was skipping time to the future and the feat didn't affecting anything, even the macrocosms or the timeline. And we have Whis revert time of individual macrocosm only that macrocosm was reverted. All of this showing NS have its own unique time axis

Ahhh okay, now I understand this better.

To clarify, this isn't me saying "Either both should have it or Hit's case is also bad." or anything like that. This was a genuine question as I wasn't understanding the difference.
 
Rewatching the Darkrai movie, there honestly aren’t any direct statements saying Darkrai is on the same level as the Creation Trio, nor is his level some central point of the plot or anything like that. Darkrai and the two dragons just exchange a few blows and are shown to be capable of dodging each other’s attacks.

If that’s enough to scale, then the Pokémon in the Hoopa movie should scale as well. To be more specific:

Mega Rayquaza, Mega Latios, and Mega Latias are able to counter a combined outslaught from Kyurem, Primal Groudon, Primal Kyogre, and the Creation Trio, coming out of the attack unharmed. They’re also, on several occasions, able to trade direct blows with them, as absurd as that sounds.

Scans here

This is even more impressive when you consider that Dialga and Palkia used their signature moves, which would actually give them even more reason to scale to Low 1-C than Darkrai.
 
Ahhh okay, now I understand this better.

To clarify, this isn't me saying "Either both should have it or Hit's case is also bad." or anything like that. This was a genuine question as I wasn't understanding the difference.
It is fine, i don't mind much
 
Rewatching the Darkrai movie, there honestly aren’t any direct statements saying Darkrai is on the same level as the Creation Trio, nor is his level some central point of the plot or anything like that. Darkrai and the two dragons just exchange a few blows and are shown to be capable of dodging each other’s attacks.
That's literally just basic powerscaling...?
 
Rewatching the Darkrai movie, there honestly aren’t any direct statements saying Darkrai is on the same level as the Creation Trio, nor is his level some central point of the plot or anything like that. Darkrai and the two dragons just exchange a few blows and are shown to be capable of dodging each other’s attacks.

If that’s enough to scale, then the Pokémon in the Hoopa movie should scale as well. To be more specific:



Scans here

This is even more impressive when you consider that Dialga and Palkia used their signature moves, which would actually give them even more reason to scale to Low 1-C than Darkrai.

This would also mean that Primal Groundon and Primal Kyogre are also Low 1-C, since they are shown comparable to each others.

 
That's literally just basic powerscaling...?

Robo, I know you’re trolling, but read the thread. The OP has been saying that Darkrai scales for narrative reasons and because he has more concrete feats than the others. I’m just showing that he’s not the only Pokémon with those characteristics.
 
Robo, I know you’re trolling, but read the thread. The OP has been saying that Darkrai scales for narrative reasons and because he has more concrete feats than the others. I’m just showing that he’s not the only Pokémon with those characteristics.
There is nothing to troll here. You're trying to dismiss Darkrai's feat by saying 'all he did was exchange a few blows' when that is how scaling works for them specifically without it being an outlier or pis. I know you know you can dismiss Primal Groundon and Primal Kyogre as outliers/PIS.
 
Last edited:
There is nothing to troll here. You're trying to dismiss Darkrai's feat by saying all he did was 'exchange a few blows' when that is how scaling works. I know you know you can dismiss Primal Groundon and Primal Kyogre as outliers/PIS.

???????????????????

Where am I dismissing anything? I’m literally saying it’s valid and using it as an argument to show that the Pokémon in the Hoopa movie should scale for the same reason.

The reason I said there are no major narrative implications that Darkrai scales to the Creation Trio is because there’s currently this false belief that Darkrai is a special case and that therefore no one else scales, which is false.
 
I don’t see why other Pokémon scaling or not scaling to the Creation Trio is relevant to this thread. Darkrai and Cresselia are only mentioned in the OP because they’re already accepted to be scaling to the Creation Trio. The thread isn’t trying to change any scaling chains, only the cosmology.
 
Rewatching the Darkrai movie, there honestly aren’t any direct statements saying Darkrai is on the same level as the Creation Trio, nor is his level some central point of the plot or anything like that. Darkrai and the two dragons just exchange a few blows and are shown to be capable of dodging each other’s attacks.

If that’s enough to scale, then the Pokémon in the Hoopa movie should scale as well. To be more specific:



Scans here

This is even more impressive when you consider that Dialga and Palkia used their signature moves, which would actually give them even more reason to scale to Low 1-C than Darkrai.
The main difference is that Darkrai doesn't have many appearances beyond the movie where he is the focus (the others being a random DP episode and Tobias', though there might be others). All of the pokemon in the Hoopa movie have some form of scaling relation where they are struggling against mons that have absolutely 0 business even being mentioned in the same conversation as the CT and their actual feats are literal infinites lower.
 
The main difference is that Darkrai doesn't have many appearances beyond the movie where he is the focus (the others being a random DP episode and Tobias', though there might be others). All of the pokemon in the Hoopa movie have some form of scaling relation where they are struggling against mons that have absolutely 0 business even being mentioned in the same conversation as the CT and their actual feats are literal infinites lower.

Well, give me examples of this regarding Primal Groudon, Primal Kyogre, Mega Latios/Latias, and Mega Rayquaza.

You’re arguing that Darkrai is a special case because it has few appearances outside the movies, which would logically mean it has fewer anti-feats. But at the same time you’re acknowledging that Tobias’s Darkrai lost to Ash’s Sceptile.

The easiest way to resolve that is to say it’s a different Darkrai. So why wouldn’t that also apply to the Pokémon I listed above? I want to emphasize that what Darkrai does in its movie is also done by Mega Latios/Latias and Mega Rayquaza.

Mega Rayquaza in particular has an entire lore about how Mega Stones derive from it, and some Mega Pokémon on the wiki currently scale from the Creation Trio.

So what exactly is the problem?
 
The easiest way to resolve that is to say it’s a different Darkrai. So why wouldn’t that also apply to the Pokémon I listed above? I want to emphasize that what Darkrai does in its movie is also done by Mega Latios/Latias and Mega Rayquaza.
Now that does goes beyond the scope of this particular revision, and funny enough, it's something I actually agree with, but supporters in general disagreed so hard many wanted to quit the wiki altogether when it got first introduced (y'all know what I'm talking about). Unfortunately, what is currently accepted for Pokemon profiles, is generalize their most consistent scaling and apply that across the board. To change how we handle the profiles in that manner would require a different thread.

Mega Rayquaza in particular has an entire lore about how Mega Stones derive from it, and some Mega Pokémon on the wiki currently scale from the Creation Trio.
How we take mega evolution is apply a multiplier to the pokemon, with specific exceptions where they show direct feats or scaling to higher (which is the current case for Mewtwo and Rayquaza, funny enough).

As for antifeats for the primals and mega latis, I'll let others respond to that if they want to, as quite admittedly, I don't remember every single instance and can't think of something off the top of my head (hey, maybe it got merit)
 
I mean I wouldnt know abt Tier 1 and Tier 2 stuff, and i know people are saying the thread isnt about what scales but i definitely dont think we should be making any rando trainers who you can merely battle after approaching a rando creation trio member, scale to the Creation Trio (especially when it requires jumbling up anime and game continuities which i know this wiki wants to composite but there are very obvious differences in stuff. Even the latest Death Battle acknowledged this)
 
Last edited:
Now that does goes beyond the scope of this particular revision, and funny enough, it's something I actually agree with, but supporters in general disagreed so hard many wanted to quit the wiki altogether when it got first introduced (y'all know what I'm talking about). Unfortunately, what is currently accepted for Pokemon profiles, is generalize their most consistent scaling and apply that across the board. To change how we handle the profiles in that manner would require a different thread.

Fair enough.

If we’re going for narrative consistency, then there shouldn’t really be a problem either, right? I understand the argument that you can’t apply scaling because of anti-feats, but as far as I know, the Mega forms of the three Pokémon I listed above don’t have any major anti-feats, although I could be wrong since I haven’t watched Horizons.

Mega Evolution is an enormous power source. There aren’t any official multipliers (as far as I know), but it’s so strong that a Mega Charizard can fight a Zygarde that scales to High 3-A, so at that point pretty much everything is arguable.

How we take mega evolution is apply a multiplier to the pokemon, with specific exceptions where they show direct feats or scaling to higher (which is the current case for Mewtwo and Rayquaza, funny enough).

Multiplier? Do we have an official multiplier for Megas? Uh, that’s new to me.

But yeah, even so, Mega Rayquaza should be a special case on its own. I mean, it would be really weird to have random gym leaders mog arguably the strongest Mega ever, no?

As for antifeats for the primals and mega latis, I'll let others respond to that if they want to, as quite admittedly, I don't remember every single instance and can't think of something off the top of my head (hey, maybe it got merit)

I'm pretty confident the trio of megas should scale at least. The primal duo is more contentious yeah. I would be fine just with those 3.
 
Multiplier? Do we have an official multiplier for Megas? Uh, that’s new to me.
"Official" is not the correct word, but basically is higher than the multiplier Marowak gets when holding the thick club. That's the lowest that can be applied. Anyone else, if they get feats, they get scaled higher than that.
 
I mean I wouldnt know abt Tier 1 and Tier 2 stuff, and i know people are saying the thread isnt about what scales but i definitely dont think we should be making any rando trainers who you can merely battle after approaching a rando creation trio member, scale to the Creation Trio (especially when it requires jumbling up anime and game continuities which i know this wiki wants to composite but there are very obvious differences in stuff. Even the latest Death Battle acknowledged this)

I completely agree, but I think this should be saved for another thread, not gonna lie. Right now, almost every trainer on the wiki scales to the Creation Trio in one way or another.
 
I completely agree, but I think this should be saved for another thread, not gonna lie. Right now, almost every trainer on the wiki scales to the Creation Trio in one way or another.
Blame GF shoving Cynthia everywhere

To be noted, that's only on specific keys.
 
I don’t see why other Pokémon scaling or not scaling to the Creation Trio is relevant to this thread. Darkrai and Cresselia are only mentioned in the OP because they’re already accepted to be scaling to the Creation Trio. The thread isn’t trying to change any scaling chains, only the cosmology.

This is precisely why I didn't want this thread to be changed into a scaling discussion and take away from the actual topic here. Especially when a lot of this has been accepted for ages and is only just now being questioned.

But if it needs to be discussed here

Rewatching the Darkrai movie, there honestly aren’t any direct statements saying Darkrai is on the same level as the Creation Trio, nor is his level some central point of the plot or anything like that. Darkrai and the two dragons just exchange a few blows and are shown to be capable of dodging each other’s attacks.

Darkrai’s case & and the Hoopa debacle are 2 vastly different cases. But more importantly, Darkrai’s battle with Dialga & Palkia being reduced to just “exchanging a few attacks” is just outright not true.

Darkrai’s contention with Dialga & Palkia is plot essential, as he’s the only Pokemon in the movie (his debut movie where he’s a central character, also) strong enough to fend against them & keep Alamos Town from being instantly vaporized. His fight with them also isn’t just a “one off” thing. Theres a consistent line of feats throughout the movie that demonstrate Darkrai blatantly holding his own against both of them at once.

Darkrai sensing Palkia being an extreme threat, him briefly battling Palkia as an equal, once Dialga joins in Darkrai is blocking attacks from the 2 of them, directly taking several of their attacks head on and continuing to stand against them. The movie even makes it a point for Darkrai to stop their collusion of Roar of Time & Spacial Rend, which would’ve destroyed the dimensional rift, by absorbing them into himself. In order to buy Ash and the others time to play Oracion and stop the whole conflict. Darkrai protecting Alamos Town & the dimensional rift is an important point of the plot & it’s a consistent thing we see.

Not to mention, it’s not just in the anime where Darkrai’s shown world-ending feats & being comparable to Dialga & Palkia. Darkrai has his own Tier 2 feat from Pokepark of merging universes. And in Mystery Dungeon, Darkrai is outright the antagonist & is the reason Primal Dialga happened in the first place. It has also taken serious attacks from bloodlusted Palkia & whatnot and can still live to tell about it afterwards.

If that’s enough to scale, then the Pokémon in the Hoopa movie should scale as well.

Hoopa and the Clash of Ages, however, is just pulling legendaries from different gens all into one place, where these legendaries have lore & scaling that, as of right now, have absolutely 0 business in being anywhere close to the same level as the Creation Trio. With a plot about legendaries having a battle Royale, of course there's going to be expected showings of these legendaries battling ones they very much shouldn't be. Thats why we can claim PIS. You have to take this into account when thinking about these legendaries lores and their respective places within it beforehand.

And keep in mind too, unlike with Darkrai, this is the ONLY time out of any Pokemon media that they have any kind of interaction involving the Creation Trio here. Even if Clash of Ages was to be tried taken seriously in powerscaling, this is one instance vs a consistent number of other ones where these legendaries portrayals are vastly inferior to the CT.

Hell, even if you take the CT out of the equation, the feats are still outliers. Primal Groudon & Kyogre are now comparable to White/Black Kyurem? The same Kyurem who's > Genesect, who's = Mega Mewtwo, who's inferior to Mega Rayquaza? The latter who's 110% superior to the Primals?
 
Hell, even if you take the CT out of the equation, the feats are still outliers. Primal Groudon & Kyogre are now comparable to White/Black Kyurem? The same Kyurem who's > Genesect, who's = Mega Mewtwo, who's inferior to Mega Rayquaza? The latter who's 110% superior to the Primals?
Yeah but rn nothing says that's a contradiction over them being Tier 1 besides vibes.

But regardless...
This is precisely why I didn't want this thread to be changed into a scaling discussion and take away from the actual topic here. Especially when a lot of this has been accepted for ages and is only just now being questioned.
We're only at a step closer to get the insane level of bias this wiki has against Mario.

Anyway, @Planck69 also disagreed with bringing scaling here, no idea why Lephyr is now somehow a veto here.
 
As for the cosmology, I am fine with the Rift being Low 1-C, given it not only separates parallel space-time continuums but is in itself stated to be endless. That much seems straightforward.

So I can agree with Low 1-C for the totality of the multiverse and Creation Trio (and Arceus being 1-C subsequently) but no higher than that until there's more elaboration on the Rift having a timelinen of its own.
I agree with Planck. The Rift seems to satisfy the requirements for a significant 5-D structure.
Low 1-C for that dimension between parallel universes is fine

1-C is not fine, evidence for that dimension between universes having its own time axis is lacking

1-C (6-D) for Arceus is fine, cause he just upscales i guess
At the very least, the main purpose of the thread has been accepted.

Anyway, @Planck69 also disagreed with bringing scaling here, no idea why Lephyr is now somehow a veto here.
Hello???
I see. It had seemed odd to me, given a cosmology inherent size should have little to do with who directly scales (since it can just be an outlier or the like).

But if that's the rule then sure. Thanks for the correction.
Like, there's a difference to changing our current standards on the scaling (something I even noted to Excelsis and they agreed to leave it), but discussing who scales at all here within those standards? 100% the purview of the thread.

But hey, noted for the future.

Edit: You know what? Nah. @Planck69 do you agree with ignoring entirely the scaling outside what's already accepted on the profiles for this thread? Since threads application fall to us, I want us to follow the rules, but if you agree to it, I will leave it alone.
 
Last edited:
At the very least, the main purpose of the thread has been accepted.


Hello???

Like, there's a difference to changing our current standards on the scaling (something I even noted to Excelsis and they agreed to leave it), but discussing who scales at all here within those standards? 100% the purview of the thread.

But hey, noted for the future.

Edit: You know what? Nah. @Planck69 do you agree with ignoring entirely the scaling outside what's already accepted on the profiles for this thread? Since threads application fall to us, I want us to follow the rules, but if you agree to it, I will leave it alone.
Honestly, I'd thought that was basic practice. If the scaling to the cosmology for characters already exists then I had assumed it would just be a matter of updating the tier labels (not like Low 1-C is any more of an outlier than 2-A if it wasn't before).

I don't mind following the rules but if possible, I'd rather just sort out the scaling on another thread for the more controversial characters.
 
I don't mind following the rules but if possible, I'd rather just sort out the scaling on another thread for the more controversial characters.
Kino

There, you got staff permission. Proceed once the 48 hrs are done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top