Do you actually even read this thread, or do you only read whatever you can obnoxiously argue against?
The messages have not loaded when i answered... sowwy
... I am still funny right?
Fr tho... yeah sorrt for that
No shit I think it's more powerful, Sherlock. I literally defended the idea of it being more powerful when talking to
@AyOgUyS. I told
@XSOULOFCINDERX that it is the greatest example of PIS in the franchise. So why are you wasting both of our time, because I disagree with the tier you want for him? Get over it.
You see Shake... i... hum.... yeah "I Hum" that's my answer
Bring all the statements you want, bring every piece of WoG you can. None of that is changing my mind that Master Overlord isn't even capable of tickling the balls of a 1-C, let alone having the exact same power as before.
i mean... stronger Sonic and Shadow + Modern and more Powerful Eggtech + the Master Emerald(aka >>>> everything and everyone in Heroes)... he has better stuff than he had before... so he should be stronger
Plus... your reasoning for it is Tangle being able to hurt him... even tho you still upscale him from Super Neo?... sorry, that just makes no sense to me
If you guys wanna make a CRT upgrading him to that further down the line (after all these threads conclude), I won't get in your way or try to stop you.
Genuially thank you bro... your opinions about this franchise in particular are always good to hear
You mean like how you were trying to shill Low 1-C Metal Overlord or some other nonsense? Funny of you to say a middle ground makes no sense when that is exactly what you were trying to do mere months ago. Is it only fine when you do it?
One thing has nothing to do with the other tho? One was me saying "This is the bare minimum Overlord should scale to via these statements"
The current one is "Overlord shouldn't scale because Tangle can harm him... so let's scale him far above Tangle anyway to a point where she realistically shouldn't be able to harm him, even though we're using the fact that she harmed him as the reason to stop him from scaling higher than that."
The former at least follows a logical chain "A = B because of C" the latter doesn't, it's basically "A < B because of C, so let's arbitrarily make A much greater than B while still using C as evidence that A isn't greater than B" you're simultaneously treating Tangle harming Overlord as valid evidence when it limits his scaling and invalid evidence when it doesn't, if the feat matters, then it has to be considered consistently, if it doesn't matter because of outliers, anti-feats, plot, or whatever reason, then it can't be used to cap his scaling in the first place, so we either scale him bellow Super Neo due to base chars harming him, or we scale to him to what circunstances shown he should be and treat the fight as an outlier (btw didn't we do just that back when IDW was a separated canon? The base cast was 8-A while Overlord was 5-B/5-A... I don't see how things are different now)
please look at
