This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
This is a very simple revision so should just be fine with my approval - and Therefir (thought not a thread moderator, is a knowledgeable MHA supporter) also agrees with it.
Well, I'm not necessarily opposed - it just seems like a scaling leap. It is different applications; firing it all off in a single blast vs. keeping it cloaked around him as an aura. Doesn't necessarily mean every action he takes is like having the energy beam stacked on top of it.
I think M3X had a good point about waiting for the arc to end. It seems like Sukuna should also get pseudo-forcefield creation for his barrier of slashes that lets him grab swords.
It seems to be assuming that Boros using his latent energy for an energy beam and Boros using his latent energy to push himself around is the same value?
Clover is correct. Boros boosting his movements with energy isn't necessarily the same thing as him applying an energy bullet over his strikes and therefore doubling his AP.
The fan to the screen distance uses the exact same angsizing and even less amount of pixelscaling steps than the cube to the screen.
I just showed you that your interpretation of events is unsupported. I linked you the clip where we can see for ourselves that Wolfram didn't raise the cube up...
If you're arguing that the purpose of that shot is irrelevant to the size of the cube, why is it being used to find the distance the cube travelled... which is entirely dependent on the size of the cube?
Am I the only one who sees the contradiction here? You're suggesting the cube was drawn...
...finding the distance the cube travelled:
Fan = 40 px = 43.986 m
Cube Side = px = 1355.318 m
Screen Height = 1072 px
Angular Size = object size*panel height in pixels/[object height in pixels*2*tan(70deg/2)]
Distance of Fan From Screen = 43.986*1072/[40*2*tan(70deg/2)] = 841.768144209 m...
Gojo stated that the reason why he was able to tank his own Hollow Purple better than Sukuna is because it was his own curse energy.
Same thing could apply to Sukuna and the fire arrow.
Because I have my own opinion on the Yhwach situation which I stated, but I agreed with closing the thread.
And if I the OP didn't present a good enough argument in the thread, I would have disagreed with it despite my own opinion on the matter.
Just because I think the profile would be better...
I'm not going to argue that such a shot makes it more likely that the size is wrong, but my mindset when approaching this is:
"Okay, by doing a 1-to-1 comparison ot fan to cube, we get a size of X for the cube if the fan is size Y."
In a vacuum, that's the end of it. The fan is size Y so the...
I didn't mean anything negatively directed at you; just saying that's how the calc seems to me, not that it is what is going on.
You can have a different interpretation of course; I know we have very different mindsets when approaching this.
I think if the pixelscaling and angsizing produces...
My thread's going to take a while longer to go up. It's nowhere near as important now because it won't affect the ratings of any of the characters based on the new Wolfram calc - so dropped a little bit in terms of prioritization for me.