• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Ayanokouji Full Strength Contextualized

It always baffles me how the profiles for Ayano and the content threads made on him make it seem like his pinky finger alone upscales from the whole verse. Like, Ayano needs 0.001 percent of his full capabilities to annihilate everybody else. It's hilarious to me
Yeah the verse is scaled pretty bad. Ayanokouji is one of the most analytical characters in fiction, he knows his own limits but for some reason they want him to be physically superior to every single character when that's not how he was written and the way the verse is now handicaps him and creates contradictions with his narrative and even the abilities he has and why he has them
 
Disagree via Zetsus's and Huntman's reasons

I don't know why we're taking Koji's words seriously when he is literally meant to be an unreliable narrator. Besides, a lot of his statements used here are easily contradicted. Like the whole bit of Albert being stronger than Koji gets shafted when Koji easily overpowers Hosen, who is stronger than Albert lol
 
its clear ayanakoji is not the most superior physically
Except lots of contradictions

Miyabi, who is equal to Manabu, who could supposedly one-shot Koji, gets one-shot by a barely serious Koji

If we accept this proposal, the scaling chain would be:

Manabu>Koji>Miyabi=Manabu

See the issue? Same with the Albert and Hosen point:

Alber=Hosen>Koji (broken non dominant hand)>Hosen (dominant hand)>Albert

We also know Manabu is above everyone else during year 1, and rivalled only by Miyabi. Hosen is the only student stated to be too much for Manabu in Y2. So we end with a very silly scaling chain:

Koji (his injured hand, non-dominant, was able to overpower Hosen and had him terrified)>Hosen (Needed to be ambushed by Ryuen's gang to lose, including Albert, and stated to be above Manabu)>Manabu (could "oneshot" Koji. Also above everyone during Year 1)=Miyabi (Repeatedly stated to be Manabu's equal is every way)>Albert ("stronger" than Koji)>Koji=Ryuen (his blow was "heavy")>Miyabi (got oneshotted by Koji)=Manabu (equal to Miyabi. Above everyone in year 1, including Ryuen)>Ryuen


Y'all are taking the narration of a guy who is literally an unreliable narrator way too seriously when the actual showings contradict what nonsense he is yapping.

The whole statement about Ryuen's gang being physically superior to Ichika gets contradicted by an injured Ichika's extreme diffing a healthy Ibuki and Horikita in a 2v1; the latter is confident in facing Sudo....who is comparable to Ryuen. Mind you, Ichika was speed blitzing both of them, meaning it was also a stat diff, not just skill.


Either we listen to a character who is literally known to have numerous contradicting statements and is an unreliable narrator with said statements getting debunked by actual showings, or actually use the actual physical showings that actually happened.
 
AP is measured in joules, because it's simplified (even to the point where some people just take the total energy and think that it's usable as it is - one example is in this thread, no offense meant towards anyone). The actual stuff that determines the damage is impact force and pressure.
All terms force, energy and pressure can be used to indicate damage, there's no demarcation between them at least in fictional terms.

Force is simply the direct measure of the acceleration which can be given to a piece of mass, while pressure goes in-depth indicating the same force but even reflecting the total surface area the force actually acted upon.

But work done goes more in-depth with the fact that it can indicate both force causing a certain displacement of a piece of mass and at the same time, indicate the pressure acting upon a volume of the same mass.

So yes, work done actually is a better measure for damage.

Force and pressure don't independently determine damage, you can have imparted massive amounts of acceleration (1000 m/s^2) to a large amount of mass (1000 kg), giving a force of 1 million N, but you would still cause it to move only like a centimeter if the work you do overall is limited to 10000 J.

So no, what ACTUAL stuff that determines the damage is NOT FORCE AND PRESSURE, it's actually work done which indicates the actual impact in real world terms. Interesting physics discussion whatsoever, you can give this a read definitely, to understand more of what I am trying to imply and deliver.
You definitely should, unless you want to get a character as high as possible based on misinterpreted terms.
I already said how authors aren't powerscalers. COTE by the way, isn't the only verse you can go against if you are trying to imply that there should be an "exact" usage of terms. And none of what this thread says somehow goes against your "want to get a character as high as possible based on misinterpreted terms", it in fact goes against canonical feats and tries to exploit absolutely NO PROBLEMS which COTE has as of now, all of the incoherences which were present in COTE have either been retconned with actual feats and showdowns between characters, or have been substantially explained enough to not be believable by the story itself.

So no, I am not "misinterpreting" anything. All this thread brings is a bunch of arguments which you can get by having read COTE from YT shorts and comments. I have already proven in my response by providing a point-by-point breakdown of every point in the OP, which he allegedly has "responded" to entirely in the thread, but which seems largely false to me after I did take a read of the entire thread, a whole LOT of what I mentioned, or how I specifically explained it has never been countered in the thread before.

This thread is simply a HEADCANON as of now. The OP either skipped reading after Year 2 or didn't read the novels at ALL, because he has managed to get EVEN canonical events happening WRONGLY, and I am not talking about "interpretations", he simply didn't even read some of the scans he attached himself.
😭 🙏
Dismissal of a fact doesn't make it any less correct. The fact of the matter is you confused physical strength with physical ability which is why you don't seem to understand that these characters are not superior by strength even after it's repeatedly listed. You can be physically stronger than somebody while being inferior in physical ability, that's the fact of the matter. Example. In wrestling. Big Show is physically stronger than Roman Reigns, but Roman Reigns overall is the better wrestler when you add all factors which is why he would have a higher overall on the wrestling game
Big Show and Roman Reigns are real people, and they don't have largely high differences between them to the point where they can "blitz" each other of massively stomp each other in AP. I already showed how COTE has characters who can blitz each other, so yes, none of this actually adds up.

Your mentions about physical ability and strength do not matter, I have not used those terms interchangeably in my response either, so you can refrain from punching the wall at this point.
That doesn't apply to this verse. This is not a fantasy verse with verse specific concepts, and we cannot simply create a headcanons for the verse because you "could care less" that's an even bigger problem if you're willing to purposely midscale the verse even after proven incorrect
You never proved me incorrect, I already remember like 3 times (the part where you thought a certain statement is said for Kiyotaka instead of Ryuuen when you can just get it correct if you read the ENTIRE page lmfao, the alleged "Nanase can blitz Kiyotaka" thing which is a standard incoherence in your response itself and means that Nanase is somehow too dumb to actually not be able to beat someone whom she can actually "blitz" - the scan never said that she can blitz him, and Albert durability thing which Albert HIMSELF DISAGREED with in Year 2 like a 10 volumes later).
And I gave quadruple that debunks it proving the opposite yet you want to dismiss them and even in the scales you sent which I said multiple times it literally says what im saying after being told my scans were "fan made" so that was a lie told by the zesty guy. That's not helping anyone.
One or two of those scans are from translations which are not official, so I don't blame him, I also pointed them out in my response if YOU DID "READ" IT.
And that's the problem what you think is actually different than whats being told and described over and over and over and over again. Simply going through them 1 by 1 dismissing source material is not helping and even when you guys send scales it's the exact same scales I already sent making the conversation go in circles.
I am not even going in circles, you are, lmfao. What you have said throughout the thread isn't the first time it has been talked about on the wiki.
The source of where it comes from doesn't change the validity of it. YouTube has videos about every anime. Not just cote.
Yeah, and you also use the interpretations from the same YT videos too, type something REAL and something which you yourself believe in.
This isn't true at all as shown you are purposely dismissing statements that prove he's human then using the ones that you think upgrade him just for the scans to be proven in favor of my point being physical strength and physical ability are not the same things. There are characters in the verse physically stronger than others while being inferior in total physical ability. That won't change and dismissing it when it's said over 20 times is bad faith.
He's a human with abnormal physiology, which has been proven more than just a single time in the verse. (And I also said it like thrice in my entire response to the OP if you did "read" it LMFAO.)

You can use human terms to scale his anatomy, but the verse itself makes it clear that his physiology is largely different.
It always baffles me how the profiles for Ayano and the content threads made on him make it seem like his pinky finger alone upscales from the whole verse. Like, Ayano needs 0.001 percent of his full capabilities to annihilate everybody else. It's hilarious to me
The "0.001 percent" exaggeration to make it seem bad... hmm? No, Kiyotaka ultimately blitzed and neg-diffed a character like Ichika who blitzed and neg-diffed both Suzune and Ibuki while being in a state where she canonically shouldn't even be able to walk properly and fought with both of them on the brink of collapse. Ichika also took attacks from Ibuki which didn't make her get immediate "concussion", and the OP uses an obvious plot deception statement where Kiyotaka mentions about him getting concussion from a single attack of Ibuki while all of what I typed earlier EXISTS. 😭

Yeah, it's not "0.001 percent" but there's a canonical large gap between him and Ichika, and a large gap between Ichika and Ibuki, so yes, he can definitely be CANONICALLY dozens of times stronger than the rest of the cast which are low tiers, you can't prove it otherwise.

Also, you can leave with the "pinky finger" message which you typed just to exaggeratingly make the verse seem bad because, yes, while there definitely wasn't a pinky finger thing, he did mention about him taking low tiers in his verse with just a single hand while only defending (Y2V11) and did even mention about a possibility of taking both of them while being blindfolded but only rejected the idea because it would mean being forced into an aggressive fight, and did talk about taking on a character blindfolded who has similar or greater calibre (Nanase) in Y2V3. And the person him going to do this to? IBUKI and Suzune 😭. And yeah, the OP thinks that a character who was going to receive this kind of treatment (Ibuki) can oneshot Kiyotaka LMFAO.

Refrain from posting your exaggerated numbers if all you mean to do is make it seem bad and play a card on it...
Like I don't see similar treatment towards statistics for other God tier characters who unironcally solo their verse 10x over on here.
Yeah, because they are popular and people have fortunately taken their times to read their series, unlike COTE where you can see a thread every 10 days with things you probably don't even know happened in the novels as a novel reader. 😁 🥳 🥳
 
Except lots of contradictions

Miyabi, who is equal to Manabu, who could supposedly one-shot Koji, gets one-shot by a barely serious Koji

If we accept this proposal, the scaling chain would be:

Manabu>Koji>Miyabi=Manabu

See the issue? Same with the Albert and Hosen point:

Alber=Hosen>Koji (broken non dominant hand)>Hosen (dominant hand)>Albert

We also know Manabu is above everyone else during year 1, and rivalled only by Miyabi. Hosen is the only student stated to be too much for Manabu in Y2. So we end with a very silly scaling chain:

Koji (his injured hand, non-dominant, was able to overpower Hosen and had him terrified)>Hosen (Needed to be ambushed by Ryuen's gang to lose, including Albert, and stated to be above Manabu)>Manabu (could "oneshot" Koji. Also above everyone during Year 1)=Miyabi (Repeatedly stated to be Manabu's equal is every way)>Albert ("stronger" than Koji)>Koji=Ryuen (his blow was "heavy")>Miyabi (got oneshotted by Koji)=Manabu (equal to Miyabi. Above everyone in year 1, including Ryuen)>Ryuen


Y'all are taking the narration of a guy who is literally an unreliable narrator way too seriously when the actual showings contradict what nonsense he is yapping.

The whole statement about Ryuen's gang being physically superior to Ichika gets contradicted by an injured Ichika's extreme diffing a healthy Ibuki and Horikita in a 2v1; the latter is confident in facing Sudo....who is comparable to Ryuen. Mind you, Ichika was speed blitzing both of them, meaning it was also a stat diff, not just skill.


Either we listen to a character who is literally known to have numerous contradicting statements and is an unreliable narrator with said statements getting debunked by actual showings, or actually use the actual physical showings that actually happened.
Thread so bad even Doggo had to respond. Hard agree (love you lots broo ❤️).
 
All terms force, energy and pressure can be used to indicate damage, there's no demarcation between them at least in fictional terms.

Force is simply the direct measure of the acceleration which can be given to a piece of mass, while pressure goes in-depth indicating the same force but even reflecting the total surface area the force actually acted upon.

But work done goes more in-depth with the fact that it can indicate both force causing a certain displacement of a piece of mass and at the same time, indicate the pressure acting upon a volume of the same mass.

So yes, work done actually is a better measure for damage.

Force and pressure don't independently determine damage, you can have imparted massive amounts of acceleration (1000 m/s^2) to a large amount of mass (1000 kg), giving a force of 1 million N, but you would still cause it to move only like a centimeter if the work you do overall is limited to 10000 J.

So no, what ACTUAL stuff that determines the damage is NOT FORCE AND PRESSURE, it's actually work done which indicates the actual impact in real world terms. Interesting physics discussion whatsoever, you can give this a read definitely, to understand more of what I am trying to imply and deliver.

Guess what. Impact force is Work / distance where the distance tells you how much it deformed.

It's literally not about acceleration, but about deceleration. If you had a random person stopping a large object over the distance of 5 meters, they wouldn't scale to the original KE of the object, because the deceleration results in 5x lower force.

Newtons are the best way to measure impact (but it's simplified into joules here, I guess because the assumption is that all attacks have the same stopping distance), because it can give you pressure, which can be transferred to energy density because 1N/m^2 is basically 1 J/m^3. We literally use j/cc values which are based on MPa and GPa values which is again, pressure, which can be based on impact force / area.
So saying "punched with force of X" is more accurate, because you can already get a bunch of stuff like pressure and everything, because the deformation is already accounted for. I wasn't even trying to convince you to use this.

you previously said this : "any series doesn't go with the exact terminologies. They can use the term "force" to describe AP which is mainly energy or work. Authors aren't meant to be pro-scaling."

Work = Force * distance and just because you can apply 1,000 N over 10 meters doesn't mean that you can apply 10,000 newtons over 1 meter despite the same energy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_(mechanics)

There's hardly anything stopping you from looking this up before writing inaccurate stuff just to dismiss what the authors used in the story.
 
Last edited:
Guess what. Impact force is Work / distance where the distance tells you how much it deformed.

It's literally not about acceleration, but about deceleration. If you had a random person stopping a large object over the distance of 5 meters, they wouldn't scale to the original KE of the object, because the deceleration results in 5x lower force.

Newtons are the best way to measure impact (but it's simplified into joules here, I guess because the assumption is that all attacks have the same stopping distance), because it can give you pressure, which can be transferred to energy density because 1N/m^2 is basically 1 J/m^3. We literally use j/cc values which are based on MPa and GPa values which is again, pressure, which can be based on impact force / area.
So saying "punched with force of X" is more accurate, because you can already get a bunch of stuff like pressure and everything, because the deformation is already accounted for. I wasn't even trying to convince you to use this.

you previously said this : "any series doesn't go with the exact terminologies. They can use the term "force" to describe AP which is mainly energy or work. Authors aren't meant to be pro-scaling."

Work = Force * distance and just because you can apply 1,000 N over 10 meters doesn't mean that you can apply 10,000 newtons over 1 meter despite the same energy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_(mechanics)

There's hardly anything stopping you from looking this up before writing inaccurate stuff just to dismiss what the authors used in the story.
This is not the place to debate this. I highly suggest you make a separate thread for this topic. This thread is for the actual gap between Ayanokoji and the other characters. You are discussing impact or kinetic energy, which has nothing to do with this thread.


To put it simply, make your own CRT for your argument. Nothing you said is relevant to what OP is trying to say.
 
@UnstoppableObject
I will refrain from doing any further "physics" debate, because:
  • I don't even know what you are talking about.
  • It's heavily unrelated to the actual topic, I only gave an example to illustrate how authors aren't powerscalers with the force-energy thing.

But for one last time...
Guess what. Impact force is Work / distance where the distance tells you how much it deformed.

It's literally not about acceleration, but about deceleration. If you had a random person stopping a large object over the distance of 5 meters, they wouldn't scale to the original KE of the object, because the deceleration results in 5x lower force.
I already said all of this. Deceleration is just acceleration in opposite direction. Fiction showing deformations in solids is an inelastic collision as some (or all) energy is lost in causing deformation.

You may be going at constant velocity (no acceleration) towards the object to be deformed and still deform it. And...
Quoting from here:
  • A perfectly inelastic collision is one in which all of the initial kinetic energy is converted into heat and deformation.
Now of course, perfectly inelastic collision is an ideal situation, but in fiction, when powerscaling, we calculate the kinetic energy which caused deformation, of course, some of the initial kinetic energy may be lost as heat or other energy media, but that's not what we concern with.

The only reason why stopping a large object over a distance of 5 meters doesn't scale you to the original KE of the object would be because some energy is lost as heat to friction... Not because the deceleration results in "5x lower force", you are just making up numbers like 5x at this point. 😭
Newtons are the best way to measure impact (but it's simplified here), because it can give you pressure, which can be transferred to energy density because 1N/m^2 is basically 1 J/m^3. We literally use j/cc values which are based on MPa and GPa values which is again, pressure, which can be based on impact force / area.
So saying "punched with force of X" is more accurate, because you can already get a bunch of stuff like pressure and everything, because the deformation is already accounted for. I wasn't even trying to convince you to use this.

you previously said this : "any series doesn't go with the exact terminologies. They can use the term "force" to describe AP which is mainly energy or work. Authors aren't meant to be pro-scaling."
I don't even know how to respond to this but here we go.

Force is not the "best way" to measure impact. If it was, VSBW is completely wrong and you can fully assume the right to create a Calc Group Discussion to change their ways.

Practically... Fragmentation values (J/cc) aren't values of Tensile or Yield Strength (GPa or MPa) because fragmentation values work at the fracture point while the latter works in the cases measuring pure deformation, no fractures or breakages in objects. So, don't even mix both of them. 😭 Yes, they have the same dimensional formulae, but they differ in units and by core, definition.

THIS IS SO BAD. J/cc values aren't based on MPa and GPa. They just have the same dimensions, and you can say that they have interchangeable units (I still don't recommend doing it). But same dimensions is not being the SAME PHYSICAL QUANTITY. OR the J/cc values don't become a "basis" for the MPa or GPa values.
😭 It's like saying work done (J) is torque (Nm) because they have the same dimensional formulae. This is NOT TRUE. We do use J/cc values but they are based on actual research studies like listed on the calculations page, but THEY are not same values made by interchanging the units.


"Punched with a force of X" just indicates how much force they are imparting to cause deformation, while the actual deformation can be measured with energy.
Work = Force * distance and just because you can apply 1,000 N over 10 meters doesn't mean that you can apply 1,0000 newtons over 1 meter despite the same energy.
You should have added works like "necessarily", but...
  • If a system is capable of applying both 1000 N and 10000 N force.
  • And the system carries 100000 J of energy.
  • And the system is intended to do the same amount of work in both the cases.
Then,
Yes, you can apply 1000 N over 10 m and 10000 N over a single meter.

Your statement is highly out of proportions for fiction where the authors don't come out saying "my character has a limit to the amount of force they can apply" kind of thing. While yes, Lifting Strength is measured as a force, it is the strength while lifting, pushing, pulling and actions similar to it and not striking (punching, hitting, kicking, etc.).

So, at last, I have managed to:
  • Completely prove your "force" being more significant to indicate impact claim and also given a REAL source as to why energy is actually a good measure for impact because force just causes impact, energy measures it. And in fact, force is an application, energy is an actual transferrable quantity, only making you sound worse.
  • The energy being same and there being no limits of the applicable force can make them have same work (1000 N along 10 m and 10000 N along 1 m).

With that, you can continue with creating a calc group discussion and directly talk this out with the CGMs if you think the wiki is doing a mistake. I did it for the last time because I enjoy physics and all of what you typed didn't match even in the slightest.

But either way, none of THIS is the point of this thread so I will refrain from entertaining further.

Bring actual arguments about the scaling of the verse. Your argument roughly sums up to an "authors should necessarily be pro-scaling and take care of the terminologies they use". This is especially when you have gone from physical strength and physical ability difference to debating an ALL-NEW FORCE VS ENERGY thing. 😭 Actually bad, I have made way more arguments than just the "terminologies" thing.

If that's what you disagree with, do I take it as your agreement with everything else?

The only thing you are debating about argues about solely Kiyotaka and Sudou ability differences and it can by the way, be proven wrong by Kiyotaka stomping Sudou by literally just the onscreen feats. 😭

Stop wasting both of our times.
 
This is getting annoying atp, but I'll just try to respond to this shortly.
You should have added works like "necessarily", but...
  • If a system is capable of applying both 1000 N and 10000 N force.
  • And the system carries 100000 J of energy.
  • And the system is intended to do the same amount of work in both the cases.
Then,
Yes, you can apply 1000 N over 10 m and 10000 N over a single meter.

You cannot, because this thing can be stretched to an extreme and I could have said 100 N over 1 kilometer vs 100,000 N over 1 meter. Even if the energy is the same, the force isn't. The work would be the same (100 kJ), but it's not comparable, because this sort of depends on power output which can't go up forever, because funnily enough, it has to use the energy from its energy source to apply the force (and you can't magically "raise the power" beyond what it's capable of outputting).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_(physics)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_(physics)

Also if you punched something with a bare fist, it would fragment the object less than if you punched it with some sort of metal, because even if the energy is the same, impact force isn't, so that straight up proves my point. It's the same as punching concrete vs punching thin wood (punching concrete hurts more even if the energy is the same, because the impact force is higher)

Practically... Fragmentation values (J/cc) aren't values of Tensile or Yield Strength (GPa or MPa) because fragmentation values work at the fracture point while the latter works in the cases measuring pure deformation, no fractures or breakages in objects. So, don't even mix both of them. 😭 Yes, they have the same dimensional formulae, but they differ in units and by core, definition.

THIS IS SO BAD. J/cc values aren't based on MPa and GPa. They just have the same dimensions, and you can say that they have interchangeable units (I still don't recommend doing it). But same dimensions is not being the SAME PHYSICAL QUANTITY. OR the J/cc values don't become a "basis" for the MPa or GPa values.
😭 It's like saying work done (J) is torque (Nm) because they have the same dimensional formulae. This is NOT TRUE. We do use J/cc values but they are based on actual research studies like listed on the calculations page, but THEY are not same values made by interchanging the units.
First of all, Torque is a vector while energy is scalar.
Pressure and energy density are both scalars, so your comparison is invalid. I'm not that stupid when it comes to physics (I mean... I am, but not that much)

1 Pa = N/m^2
1 j/m^3 = N/m^2 * m/m = N*m / m^3 = J/m^3

When you punch something, it causes impact force and then pressure (which tells you how many newtons are applied to a certain area of an object.

Modulus of resilience and modulus of tougness are both measured either in j/m^3 or pascals (both can be applied)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resilience_(materials_science)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toughness
You may be going at constant velocity (no acceleration) towards the object to be deformed and still deform it.
Obviously, because once you collide, it results in impact force regardless of whether you were accelerating or not. Force = Δp / Δt. Extreme deceleration means low duration. Moving on constant speed or not, it barely changes anything.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum


I already said how authors aren't powerscalers. COTE by the way, isn't the only verse you can go against if you are trying to imply that there should be an "exact" usage of terms.
That doesn't mean anything, nor does it justify dismissing some of the terms just because you think they're inaccurate.
This wiki (and many others) simplifies AP into joules, so it's easier to calculate most of the stuff. They don't do it, because it would be more correct.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_(mechanics)

I know that most of this is pointless atp, because this is now literally about anything else but the original topic. My only problem is you using questionable arguments to prove a point (even though you have tons of other arguments which are valid as far as I can see).
I have a feeling you'll just dismiss all of this and call me stupid anyways, because you're the one who calculated the 49.3 kJ and then said that it's equal to Kouenji's durability.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...enji_jumps_a_mountain:_Classroom_of_the_Elite
If you know physics so well then you should know that doing this is incorrect even if the calculation is correct. Regular humans would have durability equal to thousands of joules according to the exact same logic and calculation.
So I'm skeptical about both your intentions in here and your knowledge of physics, because at least one of those things is bad.
 
Last edited:
This is getting annoying atp, but I'll just try to respond to this shortly.


You cannot, because this thing can be stretched to an extreme and I could have said 100 N over 1 kilometer vs 100,000 N over 1 meter. Even if the energy is the same, the force isn't. The work would be the same (100 kJ), but it's not comparable, because this sort of depends on power output which can't go up forever, because funnily enough, it has to use the energy from its energy source to apply the force (and you can't magically "raise the power" beyond what it's capable of outputting).



First of all, Torque is a vector while energy is scalar.
Pressure and energy density are both scalars, so your comparison is invalid. I'm not that stupid when it comes to physics (I mean... I am, but not that much)

1 Pa = N/m^2
1 j/m^3 = N/m^2 * m/m = N*m / m^3 = J/m^3

When you punch something, it causes impact force and then pressure (which tells you how many newtons are applied to a certain area of an object.

Modulus of resilience and modulus of tougness are both measured either in j/m^3 or pascals (both can be applied)



Obviously, because once you collide, it results in impact force regardless of whether you were accelerating or not. Force = Δp / Δt. Extreme deceleration means low duration. Moving on constant speed or not, it barely changes anything.




That doesn't mean anything, nor does it justify dismissing some of the terms just because you think they're inaccurate.
This wiki (and many others) simplifies AP into joules, so it's easier to calculate most of the stuff. They don't do it, because it would be more correct.

I know that most of this is pointless atp, because this is now literally about anything else but the original topic. My only problem is you using questionable arguments to prove a point (even though you have tons of other arguments which are valid as far as I can see)
This is NOT the PLACE for THIS.

LISTEN

make ur thread if u want to continue that topic.

This has NOTHING to do with the current discussion. You are only CLOGGING the damn thread with your inability to LISTEN.
 
This is NOT the PLACE for THIS.

LISTEN

make ur thread if u want to continue that topic.

This has NOTHING to do with the current discussion. You are only CLOGGING the damn thread with your inability to LISTEN.
It had to do something with invalid arguments which I "tried" to point out. I wasn't trying to start an argument as much as I was trying to point out some of the invalid points that were used (because it ends up in pointless stacking of arguments which barely help the situation instead of pointing out more direct flaws in the suggested changes).

Like... page 1 was trashed with several replies just because "the wiki doesn't work like this" was used to justify a counterargument that was completely invalid (4.6 kJ punch AP vs 49.3 kJ fall "durability"). This thing is wrong and it was used to completely dismiss something entirely and to make it sound absurd.

I certainly did cause a part of this mess, but that's also because some users refused to admit that the argument was wrong and instead defended it as much as they could. That's almost an example of bad faith arguing and blind defense of a point.

I won't reply here, since it's p*ssing everyone off, but this whole thing somewhat solidifies my stance that people care more about highballing a character (misinterpreting statements, misusing values) and mindlessly defending their scaling instead of focusing on how accurate the scaling is.

(edit: I know that the topic is chainscaling, but you can't just use a questionable value to disprove it. I don't need to make an entirely different thread to point that out)
 
Last edited:
It had to do something with invalid arguments which I "tried" to point out. I wasn't trying to start an argument as much as I was trying to point out some of the invalid points that were used (because it ends up in pointless stacking of arguments which barely help the situation instead of pointing out more direct flaws in the suggested changes).

Like... page 1 was trashed with several replies just because "the wiki doesn't work like this" was used to justify a counterargument that was completely invalid (4.6 kJ punch AP vs 49.3 kJ fall "durability"). This thing is wrong and it was used to completely dismiss something entirely and to make it sound absurd.

I certainly did cause a part of this mess, but that's also because some users refused to admit that the argument was wrong and instead defended it as much as they could. That's almost an example of bad faith arguing and blind defense of a point.
Bro. The OP is talking about the scaling chain. The calcs have NOTHING to do with this

Make ur own thread. Seriously, it's that simple. I will even make one for you if you type out ur args and dm me.
 
People are still confusing Ayanokouji being deceptive about his identity to live a normal school live with him holding back his physical capabilities in serious situations that he explicitly states there are students just as talented as him in the school in specific categories and he is only better because he is great at more things overall, and that.

To say Ayanokouji has never went all out when it's over 40 statements disproving it is insane. He literally attacks pressure points specifically because he can't do much damage to larger fighters, which is a logical explanation for the ability, and explains he learned about the genetic difference between Japanese people and African American people. He wouldn't need it if he could damage through normal means. Also, It would defeat the purpose of him even having the ability or being analytical when fighting. He also becomes extremely evasive when fighting someone with AP that can one shot him, which is why is more willing to let someone like Ryuuen hit him to feel fear but would NEVER let someome like Albert, Shiba, Housen or Manabu do it because they are harder strikers. Simple logic
 
Last edited:
Bro. The OP is talking about the scaling chain. The calcs have NOTHING to do with this

Make ur own thread. Seriously, it's that simple. I will even make one for you if you type out ur args and dm me.
The funny thing is that I just chose to give an example regarding how authors shouldn't be strictly put under skepticism for their terminology usage and used the example of how they use the term "force" to describe an attack through which we calculate AP and then he went on like some responses to explain to me about how every "attack" is a "result" of force so it's ok to use the term "force" for an attack and then went into a debate of physics with me. 😭
OIP.dEjLV_z3sEeVxezW_WJLcQHaEK

Half of this is just punching the wall and the other half of this is just stuff repeated, give actual links from the internet because seeing your physics sentences make your claims seem extraordinary.

Either way, this ISN'T the thread for it. You can begin another discussion for it.
People are still confusing Ayanokouji being deceptive about his identity to live a normal school live with him holding back his physical capabilities in serious situations that he explicitly states there are students just as talented as him in the school in specific categories and he is only better because he is great at more things overall, and that.
I don't disagree but this doesn't support your proposition in the slightest...
To say Ayanokouji has never went all out when it's over 40 statements disproving it is insane. He literally attacks pressure points specifically because he can't do much damage to larger fighters, which is a logical explanation for the ability, and explains he learned about the genetic difference between Japanese people and African American people. He wouldn't need it if he could damage through normal means. Also, It would defeat the purpose of him even having the ability or being analytical when fighting. He also becomes extremely evasive when fighting someone with AP that can one shot him, which is why is more willing to let someone like Ryuuen hit him to feel fear but would NEVER let someome like Albert, Shiba, Housen or Manabu do it because they are harder strikers. Simple logic
Albert himself disagreed with the fact that Kiyotaka was giving it his all, and I did see you repeating that argument. 💔

And a large part of it is in fact misinterpretation which I already pointed out in my very first response. And no, not letting even a low tier fighter hit you because they can damage you doesn't prove crap. If anything, it's because he is an analytical fighter that he doesn't allow these fighters hit him because they can still disorient him for a moment or so.

Shiba is a fighter who can damage Kiyotaka and I don't disagree with it, but still, there fight at maximum can last for one or two seconds (he himself said it). The Manabu statement is from the volume where he wanted himself to seem like a literal normal person and there was a mysterious aura behind him. Housen couldn't even disorient Kiyotaka's hand and was crazily outclassed by his durability in that all the energy was absorbed, and he was stopped at once while Kiyotaka had literally been stabbed and didn't even have any advantage in the situation. The Albert one is misleading too, he stated that "damage would accumulate" if he let Albert hit for too long, which is obvious, he can't literally just let Albert hit him lmfao. Why are we even using the fact that he dodged attacks from characters who are lower tiers as an excuse to close the gap between them? It's a no brainer that you would of course not want to be a PUNCHING BAG in a fight and not let damage accumulate to your body.

Can we even start with an actual point-by-point debate? 💔
 
People are still confusing Ayanokouji being deceptive about his identity to live a normal school live with him holding back his physical capabilities in serious situations that he explicitly states there are students just as talented as him in the school in specific categories and he is only better because he is great at more things overall, and that.

To say Ayanokouji has never went all out when it's over 40 statements disproving it is insane. He literally attacks pressure points specifically because he can't do much damage to larger fighters, which is a logical explanation for the ability, and explains he learned about the genetic difference between Japanese people and African American people. He wouldn't need it if he could damage through normal means. Also, It would defeat the purpose of him even having the ability or being analytical when fighting. He also becomes extremely evasive when fighting someone with AP that can one shot him, which is why is more willing to let someone like Ryuuen hit him to feel fear but would NEVER let someome like Albert, Shiba, Housen or Manabu do it because they are harder strikers. Simple logic
All yappy statements from a dude infamous for being an unreliable narrator in the light novel community

"Albert is above Koji, who needed to target weak spots!"

Let's ignore Koji overpowering Hosen, a dude whom Albert needed to ambush with a group to beat, with a broken hand! Same Hosen is stated to be equal to or above Albert. The African and Japanese genetics BS means nothing here.

"Manabu could one-shot Koji!?"

Yeah, the same Koji who easily humiliated Manabu's equal, going as far as to knock him over with one hit.

"Ichika is weaker than Ryuen's gang."

A tired and injured Ichika was mollywopping Ibuki and Horikita, the former is part of Ryuen's gang, is above Ishizaki, another member. Horikita was also confident in facing Koji after seeing his performance against Manabu, someone who is above Ryuen. Horikita was also confident in beating Sudo, someone who is above Ibuki and Ishizaki.

"Koji could feel Ryuen's kicks!"

Yeah? A grown adult can feel the pain of getting hit by a child using a hard toy. Never mind the fact that Koji sent Ryuen and outright states he had no intention of beating him in one punch, showing that he was holding back

The blow would have rendered another person unconscious, but
Ryuuen just went flying backward. I had no intention of knocking him out
with a single blow, anyway. He hit the concrete and I was on top of him in a
moment, raining punches on his unprotected torso.
An excerpt from Y1 VOL7
I fail to see how Ryuen scales to a guy who is above Manabu, Hosen, and Albert, 3 people who are physically beyond him, and said guy was deliberately holding back to avoid one-shotting him.

idk why you are mentioning Shiba when he, Tsukishiro, and Koenji are the only people who actually scale to Kiyotaka in stats. They should be in their own separate tier. Kiryuin is the only outlier since she is like Koenji, who does not take it seriously at all. So her clashing against Shiba is okayish.

Again, if we follow through with your proposal, we end up in a circular scaling chain:

Koji (his injured hand, non-dominant, was able to overpower Hosen and had him terrified)>Hosen (Needed to be ambushed by Ryuen's gang to lose, including Albert, and stated to be above Manabu)>Manabu (could "oneshot" Koji. Also above everyone during Year 1)=Miyabi (Repeatedly stated to be Manabu's equal is every way)>Albert ("stronger" than Koji)>Koji=Ryuen (his blow was "heavy" for Koji)>Miyabi (got oneshotted by Koji)=Manabu (equal to Miyabi. Above everyone in year 1, including Ryuen)>Ryuen

I also find it cute that you deliberately ignored my 1st rebuttal discussing the same thing. Escaping won't help you. You'd better address the cons of your proposal if you want it accepted.

Furthermore:


It is FAR more logical to say:
1. Kinusaga is a dumbass of a writer and ends up making inconsistencies that retcon previous statements (very true because his writing sucks post Y2 vol 5, but I digress)
2. Accept the fact that Ayanokoji is always an unreliable narrator. This is the same man who even lies about himself in HIS OWN MONOLOGUE. The fact that you are taking his words literally is simply absurd. It would be more reliable to use someone like Ike or Kushida's monologue than him because they are more objective in what they are trying to present.
 
OP was online 30 minutes ago.

They still not reply to any of my rebuttals.

This proposal lowkey got bunked.
Actually I haven't been on the site in days and I already said I wasn't about to argue the same points 30 times because even now you proved my points for the 10th time
All yappy statements from a dude infamous for being an unreliable narrator in the light novel community

"Albert is above Koji, who needed to target weak spots!"

Let's ignore Koji overpowering Hosen, a dude whom Albert needed to ambush with a group to beat, with a broken hand! Same Hosen is stated to be equal to or above Albert. The African and Japanese genetics BS means nothing here.
His hand was never broken, you can't break your hand from being stabbed, the nerves and tendens can be damaged but a broken hand comes from the knuckles breaking, and you once again prove my point that the only thing he is superior physically is lifting strength. You keep sending all of these insults but literally prove my points every single time to the point you guys even sent my scans while claiming the ones I sent were fan made
"Manabu could one-shot Koji!?"

Yeah, the same Koji who easily humiliated Manabu's equal, going as far as to knock him over with one hit.
You are once again proving my point . PHYSICALLY no one stands above the rest besides Albert. Nobody can one shot Albert yet because of the statements being African American, Ayanokouji stated as well as him punching him full power doing nothing, while everyone else can be one shot by different characters due to them being Japanese and similar
"Ichika is weaker than Ryuen's gang."

A tired and injured Ichika was mollywopping Ibuki and Horikita, the former is part of Ryuen's gang, is above Ishizaki, another member. Horikita was also confident in facing Koji after seeing his performance against Manabu, someone who is above Ryuen. Horikita was also confident in beating Sudo, someone who is above Ibuki and Ishizaki.
You are once again having an experience conversation. She is PHYSICALLY inferior which was stated. To argue source material is disingenuous and incorrect, and calling it fan translation to cover it makes it even worse.
"Koji could feel Ryuen's kicks!"

Yeah? A grown adult can feel the pain of getting hit by a child using a hard toy. Never mind the fact that Koji sent Ryuen and outright states he had no intention of beating him in one punch, showing that he was holding back
Ryuuen is a teenager in school. Tsukishiro and Shiba are the adults, and btw Koji said they hit harder than him, which I clearly put in the scaling chain under the ATTACK POTENCY section, further making my point again. So Again this is just a layer of my scaling chain being proven again
An excerpt from Y1 VOL7
I fail to see how Ryuen scales to a guy who is above Manabu, Hosen, and Albert, 3 people who are physically beyond him, and said guy was deliberately holding back to avoid one-shotting him.
Notice you specified physically. You prove my point by the own story. Albert is physically superior yet works under Ryuuen because overall he is inferior. Which is exactly what Ryuuen said about Ayanokouji when Albert said Housen could beat Ayanokouji. Which is also in my debunk above, somehow everything your saying is making my point. Because my points are consistent with every character, yours are based around Ayanokouji.
idk why you are mentioning Shiba when he, Tsukishiro, and Koenji are the only people who actually scale to Kiyotaka in stats. They should be in their own separate tier. Kiryuin is the only outlier since she is like Koenji, who does not take it seriously at all. So her clashing against Shiba is okayish.
The scans are right there, why do you keep asking why I'm mentioning these people when they are specifically being mentioned in context with what I'm saying, it's like you're responding without even looking at the scans because you know it proves my points
Again, if we follow through with your proposal, we end up in a circular scaling chain:

Koji (his injured hand, non-dominant, was able to overpower Hosen and had him terrified)>Hosen (Needed to be ambushed by Ryuen's gang to lose, including Albert, and stated to be above Manabu)>Manabu (could "oneshot" Koji. Also above everyone during Year 1)=Miyabi (Repeatedly stated to be Manabu's equal is every way)>Albert ("stronger" than Koji)>Koji=Ryuen (his blow was "heavy" for Koji)>Miyabi (got oneshotted by Koji)=Manabu (equal to Miyabi. Above everyone in year 1, including Ryuen)>Ryuen
This is literally my point its a circular chain because NO ONE scales above the other physically and the difference comes in with how well they are TRAINED. The biggest separation comes in LIFTING STRENGTH, EXPERIENCES and STAMINA. So once again for the 12th time you are proving my point man lol
I also find it cute that you deliberately ignored my 1st rebuttal discussing the same thing. Escaping won't help you. You'd better address the cons of your proposal if you want it accepted.
You do realize you haven't rebuttalled a single thing I said I actually said and just keep repeating the same things? Like you still haven't addressed the facts Y'all called my scans fan translations while also sending the exact same scans with the exact statements I posted in them, proving I never sent fan translations, and was a blatant lie to purposely spread misinformation
Furthermore:


It is FAR more logical to say:
1. Kinusaga is a dumbass of a writer and ends up making inconsistencies that retcon previous statements (very true because his writing sucks post Y2 vol 5, but I digress)
No. Logic would be to admit Ayanokouji isnt physically superior he is simply smarter and more skilled which was the point of the white room. They didn't create super soldiers.
2. Accept the fact that Ayanokoji is always an unreliable narrator. This is the same man who even lies about himself in HIS OWN MONOLOGUE. The fact that you are taking his words literally is simply absurd. It would be more reliable to use someone like Ike or Kushida's monologue than him because they are more objective in what they are trying to present.
His words align with what happens in my scaling chain so I can't ignore detailed information. That would be disingenuous and misinforming people about how this verse works
 
Except lots of contradictions

Miyabi, who is equal to Manabu, who could supposedly one-shot Koji, gets one-shot by a barely serious Koji
He is equal OVERALL in terms comparing them as STUDENTS. Both were student council presidents that doesn't mean they have the same AP and durability, Manabu becomes inferior when you include the training experience. Manabu is a black belt, Nagumo is not. Which is why he would not be Manabus equal in a fight, only in status as the president of student council. This is not a martial arts light novel, you guys think those statements mean they are talking about physical fighting stats and they are talking about school life, which is 75% if the story. Combat is secondary which is why you keep confusing these statements
If we accept this proposal, the scaling chain would be:

Manabu>Koji>Miyabi=Manabu

See the issue?
No this would not be the scaling chain. Manabu was never stated he punches harder than Koji, he simply has higher AP than Koji's durability and less AP than Alberts Durability, which scales above EVERYONE due to Koji's statements.
Same with the Albert and Hosen point:

Alber=Hosen>Koji (broken non dominant hand)>Hosen (dominant hand)>Albert
Albert is only equal in physical lifting strength which was stated in my OP and all the times it was stated. Albert is superior in AP as Housen has the same AP as Ayanokouji based on Alberts own words and Albert punch caused Ayanokouji pain after he blocked it, which hasn't happened no other times he caught a punch, meaning he punches harder. This also applies to Tuskishiro and Shiba who Ayanokouji said has more punch power than him which is also in my OP. My points are consistent that's why I can keep repeating them easily without getting confused. Everything I said is listed above already.
We also know Manabu is above everyone else during year 1, and rivalled only by Miyabi. Hosen is the only student stated to be too much for Manabu in Y2. So we end with a very silly scaling chain:
You keep confusing equals as students as equals as fighters. Nagumo has never even got in an actual fight to even be scaled. He only got punched and KO which likely means he has similar physicals as the others Koji one shot, or Koji himself too because Manabu can do it. That's my entire point. NO ONE stands out physically besides Albert in terms of AP and durability. All of this was already explained in full detail .
Koji (his injured hand, non-dominant, was able to overpower Hosen and had him terrified)>Hosen (Needed to be ambushed by Ryuen's gang to lose, including Albert, and stated to be above Manabu)>Manabu (could "oneshot" Koji. Also above everyone during Year 1)=Miyabi (Repeatedly stated to be Manabu's equal is every way)>Albert ("stronger" than Koji)>Koji=Ryuen (his blow was "heavy")>Miyabi (got oneshotted by Koji)=Manabu (equal to Miyabi. Above everyone in year 1, including Ryuen)>Ryuen
This proves Ayanokouji has superior Lifting Strength to the verse if he started back his white room regime. Current Koji is relative to Housen and Koenji, making past Koji LS STRONGER than his current self and the characters I mentioned, which was also mentioned in my scaling chain. Notice nothing in saying has to be edited into my OP Post, because it's the actual consistent scaling chain.
Y'all are taking the narration of a guy who is literally an unreliable narrator way too seriously when the actual showings contradict what nonsense he is yapping.
No, we listen to his unreliable narration when he tells us it's unreliable and inconsistent. He isn't unreliable in serious situations because he himself doesn't like to lose and will tell you once he is getting serious and still is struggling with something, calling it unreliable once more after he explicitly tells you to now listen to him defeats the purpose of him even specifying it.
The whole statement about Ryuen's gang being physically superior to Ichika gets contradicted by an injured Ichika's extreme diffing a healthy Ibuki and Horikita in a 2v1; the latter is confident in facing Sudo....who is comparable to Ryuen.
How does Ichika beating 2 non White room people and being heavily injured from It contradict it when it actually proves the point even more? The current narrative is White room is superior to the point they shouldn't even be touched by normal students and at most low diff them like Koji dif, yet kushida could hurt her, and Ibuki and Horkita beat her down with simple teamwork. And I thought white room students had insane stamina? Doesn't this prove even more the narrative is bad and their over scaled? That actually proves Ryuuen gang is superior because
Mind you, Ichika was speed blitzing both of them, meaning it was also a stat diff, not just skill.
Horikita nor Ibuki have high stats to begin with in terms of speed so that really isn't saying much. Koji blitzing her and Koji having abnormal reactions is better justification
Either we listen to a character who is literally known to have numerous contradicting statements and is an unreliable narrator with said statements getting debunked by actual showings, or actually use the actual physical showings that actually happened.
Or we listen to the hundreds of other statements that further contextualize everything and not just reading at face value. The problem is you guys are confusing these words
 
I will be contacting mods today to get this thread concluded. Not a single point of mine has actually been debunked.

1.) My scans were called fan translations, no new "official" scans provided and actually the same ones I provided were sent after I asked for them.

2.) There is far too many examples to call this "unreliable" when it actually proves the opposite.
-Direct statements about students being just as talented or superior as him in specific areas.
-His lack of intense training caused his physical lifting strength to diminish which in context was said in the weight room to Mashima about lifting weights, makes his peak lifting strength superior to where he currently is creating a chain that proves he is physically stronger in lifting when his curriculum changes back. The same applies to his stamina.
-Non white room students having multiple statements saying non White roomers have comparable stats to Ayanokouji or Amasawa and some similar.
- Ayanokouji used pressure points against opponents he can't harm with conventional attacks which he explains against Albert. To say he is holding back would defeat the purpose of having pressure points or him even saying he dealt shallow damage because it he would just use conventional attacks and wouldn't need weak points or the need to explain it.
-He has limited performance stamina and limits even with his absurd pain tolerance.
 
Last edited:
The current narrative is White room is superior to the point they shouldn't even be touched by normal students and at most low diff
Sorry, what? 😭

When was this ever established?

Either way, everything you have replied to has been debunked in the sense that the author has already retconned by writing over the previous details, has directly shown Kiyotaka being an unreliable narrator in that, and has added newer details.

I don't know why but you have conveniently chosen to not reply to Albert himself disagreeing with the fact that Kiyotaka was choosing his full strength to adjust it with your narrative, and also, hitting pressure points of someone's body doesn't really mean that your normal attacks wouldn't harm their durability.

Kiyotaka effectively chooses to hit pressure points when he wants to end fights quickly too. And if we are not living a few years back, pressure points as an ability is a standard ability of his, his choice to use it is not established as a conditional factor. He never even said anything which you are implying him to.

Not to mention that a chief point of your thread is Nanase BEING ABLE TO BLITZ Kiyotaka. Just don't. 😭 🙏
He has limited performance stamina and limits even with his absurd pain tolerance.
Wow, how does Kiyotaka's "limited" (and not "infinite") prove your points?
 
Last edited:
Sorry, what? 😭

When was this ever established?
It's literally in my OP. This is how I know you guys are just disagreeing regardless of what is said to protect a headcannon narrative, because I established this in the first opening of my post and here it is again: Ayanokouji and Tsukishiro agree that there are Non white room people as talented as white room members. Tsukishiro even says there is talent the white room cant even produce
Either way, everything you have replied to has been debunked in the sense that the author has already retconned by writing over the previous details, has directly shown Kiyotaka being an unreliable narrator in that, and has added newer details.
Once again please stop saying stuff is reconned when it isn't. Where the story is currently is a continuation of where it started. This is once again another attempt at spreading misinformation to protect a narrative which is actually against the rules I believe. Also human limitations is not "unreliable narration" it's him telling you his LIMITS which he does routinely you simply are not comprehending which I already proven when you didn't understand the difference between physical strength and physical capabilities. The narrative is only "unreliable" because you guys keep making up your own narrative of him and dismissing the CANON narrative he is telling you which forces the confusion.
I don't know why but you have conveniently chosen to not reply to Albert himself disagreeing with the fact that Kiyotaka was choosing his full strength to adjust it with your narrative, and also,
You notice how you have to focus on one statement that is likely not what you said based on how much you guys have spread misinformation here and there to make a poiny while I have nearly 100 scans to prove mine, to the point I can organize them in order and it validates the other statements above and beneath them? This is because you are not comprehending what's being said properly and creating a false narrative that doesn't stay consistent with him or the other characters. You cannot say "White room students are massively stronger than ANHS " when multiple statements prove the opposite, and then you just call it "unreliable". No, that would make your explanation unreliable.
hitting pressure points of someone's body doesn't really mean that your normal attacks wouldn't harm their durability.
It does when that was literally the context provided for why Ayanokouji used it and went further to even say no Japanese person can be that durable because of his specific genetics. He punched him full power and said he dealt shallow damage, then attacked weak points to bypass it. Calling it anything else than what's stated is headcannon.
Kiyotaka effectively chooses to hit pressure points when he wants to end fights quickly too.
Yet has never done this. He punched Nagumo in the chest. Not a pressure point. He slammed Ibuki head on the ground. Not a pressure point. However, someone with 1 of 1 genetics at his school he used pressure points and explains to us why he did it. Anything else is a headcanons.
And if we are not living a few years back, pressure points as an ability is a standard ability of his, his choice to use it is not established as a conditional factor. He never even said anything which you are implying him to.
Again, he explains explicitly why he used pressure points. Lack of damage when using conventional punches. Anything else is headcannon.
Not to mention that a chief point of your thread is Nanase BEING ABLE TO BLITZ Kiyotaka. Just don't. 😭 🙏
He said he had to take "Emergency evasive action" while in mid thought. Meaning while he was watching her and in his thoughts he had to stop to focus because she nearly caught him off guard with her speed which was twice as fast as before. None of what you are arguing can be argued because it's literally stated. Saying "oh well year 1 was reconned" because you don't agree doesn't work here.
Wow, how does Kiyotaka's "limited" (and not "infinite") prove your points?
His limitation is peak human, while the current narrative is he has superhuman stamina. Never mentioned anything about infinite stamina, he just doesn't qualify for superhuman. He can't even take blows to the head with weapons from Ibuki or Suzune, which goes into why he fights so evasive to avoid damage accumulation. See how my earlier points still apply here? It's because my scaling chain is consistent with the story and his abilities and tactics.
larger than hinits clear ayanakoji is not the most superior physimuch lly
He very much is not the most superior physically. Just the most skilled and comparable in LS to guys larger than him.
 
Like I don't see similar treatment towards statistics for other God tier characters who unironcally solo their verse 10x over on here.
What I'm noticing is these guys are a "team" and they just cosign each other and disagree with anyone who attempts to debunk the verse. Ngl I still haven't have a single person show me "official" scans to prove mine were "fan translations" which makes me believe these guys are purposely lying in this thread, and is against the rules.
 
Bro clearly does not know what supporters are 😭 ✌️
I am a cote supporter. Doesn't mean I will purposely spread misinformation and lie to protect a character I support when someone is providing proof that the verse needs cleaning, even if the character is my favorite. You told me I was posting fan translations and then posted the same scans. That was an attack on my character and was unprovoked.
 
This thread may not be easy to evaluate for anyone who isn't at least familiar with the verse given the number of responses and nuances.

Man.
 
is hand was never broken, you can't break your hand from being stabbed, the nerves and tendens can be damaged but a broken hand comes from the knuckles breaking, and you once again prove my point that the only thing he is superior physically is lifting strength. You keep sending all of these insults but literally prove my points every single time to the point you guys even sent my scans while claiming the ones I sent were fan made
A stabbed hand is obviously gonna be weaker than a healthy hand

You make a point about lifting strength, but the fact remains that Hosen acknowledged Kofi's overall strength. There is also the fact that it already contradicts Albert>Koji. You tried using African>Japanese genes as an argument but the fact Koji could have higher LS than Albert negates that notion


No this would not be the scaling chain. Manabu was never stated he punches harder than Koji, he simply has higher AP than Koji's durability and less AP than Alberts Durability, which scales above EVERYONE due to Koji's statements.
???? I never said Manabu said that, I said you claimed Manabu can one-shot Koji via a statement Koji made.
Albert is only equal in physical lifting strength which was stated in my OP and all the times it was stated. Albert is superior in AP as Housen has the same AP as Ayanokouji based on Alberts own words and Albert punch caused Ayanokouji pain after he blocked it, which hasn't happened no other times he caught a punch, meaning he punches harder. This also applies to Tuskishiro and Shiba who Ayanokouji said has more punch power than him which is also in my OP. My points are consistent that's why I can keep repeating them easily without getting confused. Everything I said is listed above already.
What statements say Albert is equal in lifting strength or is above Hosen in AP? The series never makes a distinction between the two, so every time it is said someone is stronger or equal in strength, we just assume both because the series never specifies which strength they really meant.

You keep confusing equals as students as equals as fighters. Nagumo has never even got in an actual fight to even be scaled. He only got punched and KO which likely means he has similar physicals as the others Koji one shot, or Koji himself too because Manabu can do it. That's my entire point. NO ONE stands out physically besides Albert in terms of AP and durability. All of this was already explained in full detail .
What? This does NOT contradict what I said and has nothing to do with what I'm trying to say


My argument was meant to contradict the notion of Manabu being able to one-shot Koji or Ryuen scaling to him. The logic is that Manabu and Miyabi are repeatedly considered to be equals by their own words and other people. Manabu oneshotting Koji makes no sense when Koji could one-shot his equal. The same Manabu who is above everyone else in Y1, including Ryuen. Ryuen scaling to Koji makes no sense when he is below a guy whose equal got one shotted by Koji.

This just creates a silly chain:


Manabu>Koji>Manabu=Miyabi>Koji=Ryuen
You are once again proving my point . PHYSICALLY no one stands above the rest besides Albert. Nobody can one shot Albert yet because of the statements being African American, Ayanokouji stated as well as him punching him full power doing nothing, while everyone else can be one shot by different characters due to them being Japanese and similar
???? Manabu is repeatedly hyped to be above everyone in Y1, including Albert. So Koji one-shotting Manabu's equal, who should be above Albert too, quite literally makes you point nonsense
You are once again having an experience conversation. She is PHYSICALLY inferior which was stated. To argue source material is disingenuous and incorrect, and calling it fan translation to cover it makes it even worse.
??? Idk with you, but Koji saying Ryuen's gang is physically superior to her....when an exhausted Ichika was outwrestling Ibuki...who is part of Ryuen's gang...along with Horikita...someone confident with beating Sudo....who is equal to Ryuen.....um lowkey shats on what you said.

Ryuuen is a teenager in school. Tsukishiro and Shiba are the adults, and btw Koji said they hit harder than him, which I clearly put in the scaling chain under the ATTACK POTENCY section, further making my point again. So Again this is just a layer of my scaling chain being proven again
You don't understand the analogy

You said Ryuen could harm Koji; therefore he scales. I said that even a child can harm a grown adult, meaning Koji could still one-shot Ryuen even if Ryuen could harm him


My analogy had nothing to do with Tsukishiro and Shiba. You completely misunderstood what I said. I made a separate argument for them


Notice you specified physically. You prove my point by the own story. Albert is physically superior yet works under Ryuuen because overall he is inferior. Which is exactly what Ryuuen said about Ayanokouji when Albert said Housen could beat Ayanokouji. Which is also in my debunk above, somehow everything your saying is making my point. Because my points are consistent with every character, yours are based around Ayanokouji.
Show me that statement
Btw, it's clear Ryuen did not beat Albert in a normal fight. Koji himself was confused about how Ryuen beat Albert, but we techincally learned how based on Ryuen's final speech during his beatdown. He himself flat-out states there was no way Ryuen could have beaten him

During said speech, he made it clear that he is capable of beating stronger people than him by continually going after them and harassing them, no matter how many times they defeat him. He likely just made Albert surrender via this same tactic without actually beating him in a fight; basically, this changes nothing about the scaling. He even threatened to pull the same thing on Koji based on this speech, but did not due to how much Koji scared him.


You do realize you haven't rebuttalled a single thing I said I actually said and just keep repeating the same things?
????


Ok bro? I pointed out how your argument falls apart due to the amount of inconsistency it causes. Yeah, I totally did not actually make a rebuttal.


His words align with what happens in my scaling chain so I can't ignore detailed information. That would be disingenuous and misinforming people about how this verse works
"Koji claims Manabu could one-shot him."

Koji one-shots Nagumo, Manabu's equal

"Albert is above Koji."

Koji overpowered Hosen and made him acknowledge his power (they never specified if it was just lifting or striking strength, so it's just both)

Same Hosen is above Alber, who needed a group ambush to beat him

"Ryuen could harm him"

Said Ryuen, who is below a guy whose equal he one-shotted

"Ichika is physically below Ryuen's gang."

Same chick who overpowered one of his strongest members while tired.


He is equal OVERALL in terms comparing them as STUDENTS. Both were student council presidents that doesn't mean they have the same AP and durability, Manabu becomes inferior when you include the training experience. Manabu is a black belt, Nagumo is not. Which is why he would not be Manabus equal in a fight, only in status as the president of student council. This is not a martial arts light novel, you guys think those statements mean they are talking about physical fighting stats and they are talking about school life, which is 75% if the story. Combat is secondary which is why you keep confusing these statements
Said school life includes physical exams. Nagumo had also wanted to race against Manabu, but Koji took that spot. It's clear they are physical equals

"Not a martial arts novel." Yeah ur point? Neither had an edge over the other, which would include physical abilities.

This proves Ayanokouji has superior Lifting Strength to the verse if he started back his white room regime. Current Koji is relative to Housen and Koenji, making past Koji LS STRONGER than his current self and the characters I mentioned, which was also mentioned in my scaling chain. Notice nothing in saying has to be edited into my OP Post, because it's the actual consistent scaling chain.
What? I'm clearly using Current Koji in that scaling chain. Read again:


Koji (his injured hand, non-dominant, was able to overpower Hosen and had him terrified)>Hosen (Needed to be ambushed by Ryuen's gang to lose, including Albert, and stated to be above Manabu)>Manabu (could "oneshot" Koji. Also above everyone during Year 1)=Miyabi (Repeatedly stated to be Manabu's equal is every way)>Albert ("stronger" than Koji)>Koji=Ryuen (his blow was "heavy")>Miyabi (got oneshotted by Koji)=Manabu (equal to Miyabi. Above everyone in year 1, including Ryuen)>Ryuen

My exact words. No mention of WR Koji. Why are you even mentioning him?

"Relative to Hosen and Koenji," only Koenji is relative, not the guy who got overpowered by an injured hand.



No, we listen to his unreliable narration when he tells us it's unreliable and inconsistent. He isn't unreliable in serious situations because he himself doesn't like to lose and will tell you once he is getting serious and still is struggling with something, calling it unreliable once more after he explicitly tells you to now listen to him defeats the purpose of him even specifying it.
Brother, MF does not even make us know if he is lying. So everything he says is inherently unreliable lmao.
 
This thread may not be easy to evaluate for anyone who isn't at least familiar with the verse given the number of responses and nuances.

Man.
WHen you have "supporters" who have an invested agenda in keeping a certain narrative they will argue to make sure it stays as such. I provided a lengthy explanation for every point I made only to get insulted, and lied on multiple times to the point someone said I used "fan translations" then used the same scans I used when they responded, which tells me it's a investment for them to keep the verse this way.
The OP showcases unfamiliarity with the verse in question by using gag scenes to scale characters ✌️
Classroom of the elite is not a gag light novel, also you guys want commenters to also believe the anime only scenes is more reliable than source material from the light novel. If the feat proves Ayanokouji limits you call it "unreliable narration" but if you can misinterpret a statement to make the verse upscale, you will use it. That's a concentrated effort to create a false narrative about the verse when the entire context shows the opposite, and instead of admitting you're wrong, you say it got "reconned" and this is why the thread is so long. It's the same 4 guys
 
No, we listen to his unreliable narration when he tells us it's unreliable and inconsistent. He isn't unreliable in serious situations because he himself doesn't like to lose and will tell you once he is getting serious and still is struggling with something, calling it unreliable once more after he explicitly tells you to now listen to him defeats the purpose of him even specifying it.
This just pissed me.

You just said we have listen to him despite his constant track record of lying in his internal monolouges

Ok? So we ignote the contradictions his statements make? Cool

"Doesnt like to lose" man when his sole goal is to lose in order to break his image as his father's masterpiece

And the fact bro never specifies to the reader when he is lying or being truthful
 
Classroom of the elite is not a gag light novel, also you guys want commenters to also believe the anime only scenes is more reliable than source material from the light novel. If the feat proves Ayanokouji limits you call it "unreliable narration" but if you can misinterpret a statement to make the verse upscale, you will use it. That's a concentrated effort to create a false narrative about the verse when the entire context shows the opposite, and instead of admitting you're wrong, you say it got "reconned" and this is why the thread is so long. It's the same 4 guys
Bro....they accused for using a gag scene not that verse is a gag series. The series does have gag momments due to comedy. You completely missed the point

"Verse upscale" when what you are doing is making characters stronger via scaling to Koji and makimg his skill greater due to beating people with similar stats

You are the one upscaling the verse 🤦‍♀️
 
It's literally in my OP. This is how I know you guys are just disagreeing regardless of what is said to protect a headcannon narrative, because I established this in the first opening of my post and here it is again: Ayanokouji and Tsukishiro agree that there are Non white room people as talented as white room members. Tsukishiro even says there is talent the white room cant even produce
Already replied to countless times, talent =/= current abilities.

I don't disagree with any of these, but none of the examples you provide with scans actually qualify independently enough to prove your claim. Again, I DON'T DISAGREE with it, it's just that the examples you gave literally suck as they don't have any explanation and are hard to follow for someone not knowledgeable on the verse..
Once again please stop saying stuff is reconned when it isn't. Where the story is currently is a continuation of where it started. This is once again another attempt at spreading misinformation to protect a narrative which is actually against the rules I believe. Also human limitations is not "unreliable narration" it's him telling you his LIMITS which he does routinely you simply are not comprehending which I already proven when you didn't understand the difference between physical strength and physical capabilities. The narrative is only "unreliable" because you guys keep making up your own narrative of him and dismissing the CANON narrative he is telling you which forces the confusion.
I don't think I even need to provide an analytical proof on the fact that the author has retconned or made stuff clearer, it's not something needing an analysis but is simply a raw scan to break everything you said.
You notice how you have to focus on one statement that is likely not what you said based on how much you guys have spread misinformation here and there to make a poiny while I have nearly 100 scans to prove mine, to the point I can organize them in order and it validates the other statements above and beneath them? This is because you are not comprehending what's being said properly and creating a false narrative that doesn't stay consistent with him or the other characters. You cannot say "White room students are massively stronger than ANHS " when multiple statements prove the opposite, and then you just call it "unreliable". No, that would make your explanation unreliable.
  • You never gave 100 scans to prove your point on Albert lmfao.
  • It's simply clear that he himself disagreed that Kiyotaka was using his full strength.
  • There's substantial evidence as to why Kiyotaka wasn't giving it his all, all from Y2V10.

This is simply very bad lmfao, you can't prove something which is CANON as wrong, something which is outright consistent with the state of the verse and something which doesn't add up to what you said in the slightest.

I have already read everything in this thread so far, and I don't see how you try to prove it otherwise using actual stuff except your "you guys are spreading misinformation" or "you are not comprehending".

Bro, there's nothing to even comprehend or stuff for the most part, it's just made clear. 🥀
It does when that was literally the context provided for why Ayanokouji used it and went further to even say no Japanese person can be that durable because of his specific genetics. He punched him full power and said he dealt shallow damage, then attacked weak points to bypass it. Calling it anything else than what's stated is headcannon.
Y2V10 completely retcons it, I am never re-iterating. Either you actually try to reply to my first response with actual arguments or just give up. 😭

And it's not something you can even reply to in your right mind, it's literally just blatant that Albert disagreed and Ryuuen further explained Kiyotaka's abnormal physiology.

Yet has never done this. He punched Nagumo in the chest. Not a pressure point. He slammed Ibuki head on the ground. Not a pressure point. However, someone with 1 of 1 genetics at his school he used pressure points and explains to us why he did it. Anything else is a headcanons.
LMFAO, so he punched Nagumo in the chest and not a pressure point? Let's take a look:
image.png


Solar plexus is the same thing he used against Albert for the pressure point, and it quite literally is located in the abdomen and not in the chest. Again, you fail to read a scan, and this is NOT ANALYTICAL ERROR or LACK OF COMPREHENSION, this is literally like you didn't even read it. 😭

Pressure points is his standard ability which he has used in many occassions and it's not what you think it is. Poor.
Again, he explains explicitly why he used pressure points. Lack of damage when using conventional punches. Anything else is headcannon.
I never disagreed. I only disagreed with the fact that he was giving it his all. Maybe with normal physiology, he was giving it his all, but his true power which originates with an abnormal source was never exerted in the scene.
He said he had to take "Emergency evasive action" while in mid thought. Meaning while he was watching her and in his thoughts he had to stop to focus because she nearly caught him off guard with her speed which was twice as fast as before. None of what you are arguing can be argued because it's literally stated. Saying "oh well year 1 was reconned" because you don't agree doesn't work here.
Yeah, but she still never "blitzed" him like you mentioned. And him needing to take an emergency evasive action doesn't prove crap. Not only does it only prove that all she did was make him a little more serious, but the later fight just makes it clear that he was still just playing around. 🙏

Year 1 was never retconned, it's just the statements which he gave under plot deception, which are themselves proven wrong later on in the series by substantial evidence, something which you have, in fact, never replied to.

His limitation is peak human, while the current narrative is he has superhuman stamina. Never mentioned anything about infinite stamina, he just doesn't qualify for superhuman. He can't even take blows to the head with weapons from Ibuki or Suzune, which goes into why he fights so evasive to avoid damage accumulation. See how my earlier points still apply here? It's because my scaling chain is consistent with the story and his abilities and tactics.
His superhuman stamina is NOT DUE TO NARRATIVES (I am crying 😭). Narratives only make like 20% of it, his superhuman stamina rating is due to HIS ACTUAL feats. :censored:

Suzune's bottle statement is a gag scene, and even if it wasn't, she has a glass bottle, which delivers piercing damage. Piercing damage in a verse doesn't debunk crap.
He very much is not the most superior physically. Just the most skilled and comparable in LS to guys larger than him.
He is the most superior physically, and no diffs the rest of the cast.
😗
 
I will be contacting mods today to get this thread concluded. Not a single point of mine has actually been debunked.

1.) My scans were called fan translations, no new "official" scans provided and actually the same ones I provided were sent after I asked for them.

2.) There is far too many examples to call this "unreliable" when it actually proves the opposite.
-Direct statements about students being just as talented or superior as him in specific areas.
-His lack of intense training caused his physical lifting strength to diminish which in context was said in the weight room to Mashima about lifting weights, makes his peak lifting strength superior to where he currently is creating a chain that proves he is physically stronger in lifting when his curriculum changes back. The same applies to his stamina.
-Non white room students having multiple statements saying non White roomers have comparable stats to Ayanokouji or Amasawa and some similar.
- Ayanokouji used pressure points against opponents he can't harm with conventional attacks which he explains against Albert. To say he is holding back would defeat the purpose of having pressure points or him even saying he dealt shallow damage because it he would just use conventional attacks and wouldn't need weak points or the need to explain it.
-He has limited performance stamina and limits even with his absurd pain tolerance.
Just for context I sent this yesterday to avoid what unfolded today
 
Back
Top