- 1,294
- 985
No quote, I checked, but it's basically an unspoken rule here, I've asked in the QnA and got the same response, either they not sure or they believe it's universe sized
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100
- Thread starter Warren_Valion
- Start date
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,305
- 3,271
can anyone actually explain to me what it means for a temporal axis to be "universal in size"?
- 1,012
- 621
beats me tbh this is why I hate the current standards. But from what I’ve read it seems that only a temporal axis that serves at least a universal sized realm can be considered tierable or significant 5D
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,305
- 3,271
why does a 5D temporal axis need to have a corresponding universal sized 3D space other than the universe itself?
- 1,012
- 621
but yeah honestly low 1-C universes is not at all a crazy idea atp. In an era where universal and even Multiversal bleach is anything more than a joke I think we can seriously entertain the idea of low 1-C U7 too
Jokes aside as I said U7 is probably already an insignificant 5D structure by current standards all we really need is one or two good statements and it can happen
- 1,012
- 621
Cuz standards
- 2,227
- 2,569
There's only one way it can.
- 4,352
- 3,985
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,305
- 3,271
but it doesn't even make sense
- 224
- 134
- 224
- 134
It looks like planet vegeta calc would be accepted.
- 2,227
- 2,569
small star level frieza is great, wonder how this will change the scaling chains
- 1,012
- 621
bro nothing past tier low 2-C makes sense lets be real
- 224
- 134
True
I have no idea what yall talk about half of the time
- 1,012
- 621
thoughts on this feat btw?
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,305
- 3,271
I'm not falling for that.
- 1,012
- 621
- 4,352
- 3,985
"I only watch DB for the story"
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,305
- 3,271
GOKUH"I only watch DB for the story"
- 4,352
- 3,985
Average Toei L
- 1,012
- 621
its actually pronounced as "Gokuu" I think
- 1,294
- 985
Already done this
just waiting for the thread to be concluded and I'll make the CRT and the AP blog can be updated
I also removed the namek backscaling issue
- 1,012
- 621
which backscaling issue?
- 1,294
- 985
Power levels and AP have a huge non linear relationship between the end of the Saiyan saga and Namek Saga (oozaru Vegeta aside), as evidenced by Frieza's planet Vegeta busy which then automatically made almost everyone and their mothers large planet level before they backscaled linearly
It was an eyesore to supporters and others alike
- 1,012
- 621
Just realized the new calc getting accepted means grade 3 Trunks is gonna be solar system level. based af
- 1,294
- 985
How?
- 9,770
- 3,334
The calc was accepted?
Fezzih_007
He/Him- 6,057
- 2,164
It was evaluated by two people atleast, how many is needed to be accepted again? 3?
- 1,012
- 621
was reading the old blog with replaced values but maybe the multipliers got changed so I guess it might take around MSSJ Goku to achieve solar system level
- 1,294
- 985
Solar system isn't starting until ssj2 Gohan and SPC, tbh
- 1,294
- 985
The evaluation has been accepted, the only issue was whether it applied to Vegeta and that's basically been settled
I am waiting for 48hrs to elapse
Last edited:
- 10,258
- 5,110
If this is accepted, the solar system will be bigger than normal, bro??
- 29,708
- 24,641
No? Why would it?
- 1,012
- 621
Lol no
maybe later, I'm currently gathering all the evidence and supporting evidence that points towards higher than 4-B scaling for Cell
- 1,294
- 985
- 10,258
- 5,110
Maybe with an increase in planets we can get a larger than normal solar system
- 1,294
- 985
It would make no difference whatsoever, the solar system is too big for that
- 10,258
- 5,110
I understand
- 1,012
- 621
nah it doesnt apply to planets that are based on real ones and planet size doesnt affect the destruction of the solar system in any significant way
- 10,258
- 5,110
Do you like Ryzen processors?
Similar threads
