• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

GRACE | "Remember when I wasn't just Low 2-C?" | WN Rimuru vs Monika

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, if I didn't argue for Rimuru, this matchup wouldn't have notable controversy and wouldn't have been added to profiles due to stomp. Now this matchup will be added and will taint Rimuru's profile for a long time, great!
 
This is very close to being a stomp.

Rimuru in his best case scenarios can manage a tie if he uses a thought based win condition off the bat.

If not then he loses every other version of the fight.
 
This is very close to being a stomp.

Rimuru in his best case scenarios can manage a tie if he uses a thought based win condition off the bat.

If not then he loses every other version of the fight.
Counting yours as a vote then?
 
Kinda a nitpick but you'd need to just type the name on the search bar, come on.
By the way, Monika doesn't know Rimuru's name. She only knows his appearance, so she has to search for something related to his appearance.
 
By the way, Monika doesn't know Rimuru's name. She only knows his appearance, so she has to search for something related to his appearance.
I dunno man she kinda has a cosmic awareness through reading the script.

But that's already covered as irrelevant to this debate so pointing that out is useless lol.
 
this is somewhat funny because the same people said that if you delete their char file nothing really happens in the game
I think that is just Dan Salvato being too lazy to insert an interaction for that sort of thing happening which IS weird as there are moments where the game processes when you alter the character files like deleting Monika before the game begins or inserting Monika's file in Act 4.
 
I think that is just Dan Salvato being too lazy to insert an interaction for that sort of thing happening which IS weird as there are moments where the game processes when you alter the character files like deleting Monika before the game begins or inserting Monika's file in Act 4.
the game that you play is different from the game that exist in game clearly where somehow deleting them inside the game make it somewhat matters.
 
True, last I remember if you delete certain files yourself certain things don't happen(but certain things do). But also if you save like a backup file and try to addcharacters back, which she deleted, it also doesn't work. Regardless of the saves

That and inserting Monika file back in act 4 yeah
 
Yeah, I'll just vote Monika.
Thought based Plot manipulation is just busted honestly.
 
It would still be wise to state the reason, as other people would just spam a character's name with no reason and that'd be a bad precedent.
Not arguing with that, I know just how annoying it is to be spammed like that. What I am saying is that it isn't a required rule, but something that is heavily preferred.
 
Not arguing with that, I know just how annoying it is to be spammed like that. What I am saying is that it isn't a required rule, but something that is heavily preferred.
You're just giving hot air rn, no offense.

A vote requires a reason regardless, just saying a name isn't sufficient. Even a FRA would be enough, no idea why are you getting this defensive.
 
That isn't really relevant here given this match is concluded already, and this is derailing anyway.

Asking for this to get closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top