Back now that it’s the weekend and I have time on my hands.
So as I've mentioned in a reply above, I need you to prove how Uzi's and MD's guns are the same.
? She quite literally gets the part needed for it to work properly from the Murder Drones. It’s just Disassembly Drone spare parts.
3:55
So far they've behaved differently as MD's beams cut through stuff in a straight line while Uzi's photon gun was AOE and caused destruction that way as well (such as when she shot N as I've linked below)
That’s not an AOE, the shot blasted through it’s head and hit the snow behind him(plus there was a large flash or spread to the light), you can see multiple tomes in episode 1 that the laser’s shots don’t have a real AOE and that the light from them only harm what the shot is directly concentrated at,
Well you've got that going for you as long as we don't dig into this deeper
That’s a very shallow and empty statement. Absolutely nothing changes from looking deeper into it. Looking deeper into it is the entire reason why the feat works.
As I've said above, calling me a liar when you yourself are defaulting to arguing that the gun Uzi made is the same as the gun's on MDs without evidence is a very tough move, clearly meaning that you either replied to my replies as you read them and didn't bother to change anything or you're just plain malicious here.
What are you talking about? I admit my comment there was in poor taste, but it isn’t at all without merit.
I spent a long time in the previous debate explaining why Uzi’s railgun(which explicitly uses spare parts from the Murder Drones) was using real light and throughout the entirety of that, you kept ignoring it to the very end and kept taking it as an explosion it until around the third time.(I’m also 90% sure that I cited that the railgun works off those parts in that debate as well).
I concede that the comment was overly malicious there, but that doesn’t mean that there isn’t truth to it, and the evidence comes from less than two minutes after the part where she states that the railgun is photonic, which very much makes your paragraph feel insincere.
I'll skip over this one since you need to prove they're the same guns
Done earlier in this post.
That's not really evidence as I've already said. I linked N charging up his beam and we can see light intensify as he charges it up further.
Umm no? N’s laser stated the exact same until it fired. Once it fired, it turned pink and became a heart, but it did not intensify before firing, especially in a horizontal pattern like the light when Uzi dodged.
V very much just charged up her beam and as it was charging it emitted more light (having the same visual light effects as N when he was charging his) and Uzi ducked before it fired.
As I proved above, no. The lasers charging does not look like that, sure they left a small horizontal trail, but they stayed the exact same until firing, meanwhile the one that Uzi dodged was very different, it was quite clear that the light we see was just the laser moving closer.
N's beam wasn't static, idk what gave you that Idea at all.
It very much was static(you may be confusing static as in stationary with static electricity and if that’s the case then I’m not saying anything about electricity, I’m saying that the light stayed the exact same until it fired.
Both have the light line appear before it shot through.
The difference is the intensity, the light glowed much brighter and was continuously intensifying, meaning that it couldn’t have been charging and was therefore the laser itself was moving closer to Uzi, and that’s what the light was.
You also didn't counter the visual part where the beam supposedly travels a small distance over several frames only to cross a bigger distance in 1 frame despite there being no change in framerate.
I do not get what you mean. The lasers speed is the same in the scene, it doesn’t suddenly travel more of a distance. We very well get to see the light getting more intense as it gets closer, and then after she ducks, it finally reaches and cuts through the wall in the exact pattern that the approaching light was.
Not knowing is not that good of an argument when it's clearly a gun and it's being fired at him.
You say that, but you do realize that he blatantly never looked at the railgun until that very moment, right? How would he know that it’s a gun instantly?
He was standing there and aboutnto fire c but when he glanced at Uzi, she immediately shot.
He had absolutely no way of knowing what it was(especially given that Worker Drones aren’t exactly supposed to fight back), therefore he couldn’t know to dodge it and it doesn’t work as an antifeat.
N has seen guns he should be able to discern a weapon.
Seeing a gun =/= suddenly being able to instantly discern that one thing is a gun? Not all guns look the same and it’s kinda not a real world gun, so it wouldn’t make sense for him to immediately deduce that it was a gun.
Either way it's not even that it's more so that Uzi was a shorter distance away and supposedly dodged it as it was flying towards her while N who is faster and more agile than her just stood there and took it.
N didn’t know that it was a gun and was also in the middle of trying to lock onto Uzi, N and Uzi in that fight both weren’t really in a position to move and just fired at each other, and N was the one who got shot there.
With Uzi, she dodged the laser in the fight at the end because she was not in a bad position like that where she couldn’t move.
How? The beam didn't come from J, she was
struggling getting a pen out of her eye that whole time and none of her arms were turned into the gun.
We see exactly where the laser was coming from, it came from directly in front of Uzi. It wouldn’t work if it was fired by V, given that V was in the exact same spot to the
left of Uzi
Narratively it's clear that V was the one who shot it since first we see the beam almost heat Uzi and a second after we see V with the gun firing at N.
In the exact opposite direction(N was pinned up against the second wall on the left while Uzi was in front of the first pillar on the right. The gate in the background can be used for reference), without any indication of V turning, and from a spot where we factually see that the laser couldn’t be coming from V because Uzi was facing forward in the direction of J(where the laser came from) meanwhile it would be exactly to Uzi’s side on the left if it was from V.
Yeah uh, where is the statement that they're made of the same stuff? It's deadass all I am asking here, give me the statement.
Done, it was the first thing I did here.
