• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

NEP IX problem (HSR)

Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s not even proper reasoning, nevertheless. All you’d be proving is IX having a higher degree of EE, since all Imaginary Space actually does is just erase people.
What about the whole "Conceptual end of reality" part and even Simulated Universe failing to recognize IX in the first place though?
 
IMG-6754.jpg

Paths are implicitly just the Energy an Aeon controls.
So in essence Aeons are like the Lantern Mythos Emotional Eectromagnetic Entities, "parasites" that draw off the spectrum/paths for their abstract existence and powers
 
I'm a bit confused on what is happening. Can someone clarify and one person from both sides give me a quick TLDR?
 
I'm a bit confused on what is happening. Can someone clarify and one person from both sides give me a quick TLDR?
People for NEP2 are arguing that IX has it cuz of some arbitrary statement about it being the opposite of logic. I'm saying that that's complete bs because it's not meant to be understood in an NEP2 sense, wouldn't make any narrative sense either and is completely inconsistent.
 
Agree with the downgrade.
The "beyond the conceptual void" from the page doesn't even have any scans, and Nihility being the opposite of existence rather than being beyond both existence and nonexistence entirely is not something that NEP2 should have.
 
was reminded that Planck agreed to IX's NEP1 downgrade in nova's thread that was accepted. wouldnt that mean this thread can be closed?
 
was reminded that Planck agreed to IX's NEP1 downgrade in nova's thread that was accepted. wouldnt that mean this thread can be closed?
Is something like that allowed? If it is allowed, I don't have a problem with it either.
 
Is something like that allowed? If it is allowed, I don't have a problem with it either.
im not sure but how it works tbh but technically it was agreed that IX's nep goes down? im not sure id ask a staff
 
People for NEP2 are arguing that IX has it cuz of some arbitrary statement about it being the opposite of logic. I'm saying that that's complete bs because it's not meant to be understood in an NEP2 sense, wouldn't make any narrative sense either and is completely inconsistent.
Hm I will agree with the removal of NEP2 then
 
I agree. If it were something like beyond reality and unreality I'd understand it

But being nonexistence as opposed to existence doesn't reaaaallly work imo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top