Noelle possibly large town level

[LoudestProcedure]

Simple upgrade to Noelle

It's been stated Noelle can destroy Every claymore made since 1.0 which would include Waster greatsword which can destroy mountains we don't know how big these mountains are and according to the wiki small mountain need 1.4 megatons of tnt or small city level according to the statement it took a few uses for it to break assuming it's 3 swings for this sword to break it would be 466.6 kilotons of TNT or large town level

Agree:

Disagree: @Vietthai96 (mod) @FinePoint

Neutral: @Furina003 (leaning towards agree)

 

[MSahla]

It's been stated Noelle can destroy Every claymore made since 1.0 which would include Waster greatsword

Both of these links are broken

 

[LoudestProcedure]

Both of these links are broken

They should be working now

 

[LoudestProcedure]

Both of these links are broken

It should finally be working since I switched the photos to reddit

 

[MSahla]

It should finally be working since I switched the photos to reddit

I can't open reddit. It worked before you changed it to Reddit.
Just use imgur bro as long as it worked

 

[LoudestProcedure]

I can't open reddit. It worked before you changed it to Reddit.
Just use imgur bro as long as it worked

Got it

 

[MSahla]

Now thats worked. I can Agree with this.

 

[Furina003]

I agree, but shouldn't it have a longer scaling? who will get the scaling?

 

[LoudestProcedure]

I agree, but shouldn't it have a longer scaling? who will get the scaling?

Tbh probably only Noelle for now since it's only possibly scaling to it unless you want to argue some of high tier mondstadt cast should also get it (I wouldn't argue against it if people agree with it)

 

[PedjaTarzan]

didnt uou make one thread before this with straight low 7-B rating? you can just conclude that thread too

 

[MSahla]

didnt uou make one thread before this with straight low 7-B rating? you can just conclude that thread too

Bros forgetting his own thread lol

 

[LoudestProcedure]

didnt uou make one thread before this with straight low 7-B rating? you can just conclude that thread too

Tbh I forgot I made one but after thinking about it possibly low 7-B is more likely to be where she scales then full on Low 7-B

 

[LoudestProcedure]

Bros forgetting his own thread lol

I genuinely did

 

[Furina003]

Yeah, I actually remember that CRT, and I suggested scaling Noelle to Lawachurl, since she'd defeated it.

Destroying a sword capable of destroying mountains makes sense for it to be Tier 7 due to Newton's Third Law and the calculations.

yeah simply, the sword will gain durability equal to its attack power which is capable of destroying mountains, and noelle is able to destroy the sword

So I'm pretty sure scaling would work.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

yeah the Imgur posts just don't load for me at all.

 

[MSahla]

yeah the Imgur posts just don't load for me at all.

Really? well, last time i checked it was worked.

 

[LoudestProcedure]

yeah the Imgur posts just don't load for me at all.

Should be working now

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Alright, the Waster greatsword one works, but not the first one. I have never had this issue with Imgur before lol

 

[LoudestProcedure]

Alright, the Waster greatsword one works, but not the first one. I have never had this issue with Imgur before lol

Got it try it this time

 

[MSahla]

Alright, the Waster greatsword one works, but not the first one. I have never had this issue with Imgur before lol

Btw, any thoughts on this crt? Agree or nah

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Btw, any thoughts on this crt? Agree or nah

I'd sort of like to see the evidence first. 's literally just been made available.

Got it try it this time

Thank you. I... don't think this is super solid. This is definitely a strength feat, but it is unquantifiable. If she broke this sword in a single swing, that would be Low 7-B. As it stands, she's blunting a sword in an unknown amount of swings- all we know is that they all get blunted eventually. Blunting is damaging it, though doing it over several instances certainly degrades the value. "uses" is also a vague word, in that it could mean "she went out a few times and swung it and now it's blunted" or "literally a handful of swings". In all, I'd like something more solid for a rating like this.

 

[LoudestProcedure]

I'd sort of like to see the evidence first. 's literally just been made available.


Thank you. I... don't think this is super solid. This is definitely a strength feat, but it is unquantifiable. If she broke this sword in a single swing, that would be Low 7-B. As it stands, she's blunting a sword in an unknown amount of swings- all we know is that they all get blunted eventually. Blunting is damaging it, though doing it over several instances certainly degrades the value. "uses" is also a vague word, in that it could mean "she went out a few times and swung it and now it's blunted" or "literally a handful of swings". In all, I'd like something more solid for a rating like this.

It does say it only takes a few hits if we say three it would be large town level if I'm correct I could make some changes to the crt if that's allowed

 

[Mr. Bambu]

It does say it only takes a few hits if we say three it would be large town level if I'm correct I could make some changes to the crt if that's allowed

It says a few "uses", not "hits". Is a use an outing with a sword, or just a single swing? Three would be the absolute highest interpretation of that, the absolute minimum of "few". Even then, this is just to begin dulling the blade- not to destroy the sword.

You can change the CRT, but my stance is that this is too vague to use.

 

[LoudestProcedure]

It says a few "uses", not "hits". Is a use an outing with a sword, or just a single swing? Three would be the absolute highest interpretation of that, the absolute minimum of "few". Even then, this is just to begin dulling the blade- not to destroy the sword.

You can change the CRT, but my stance is that this is too vague to use.

Understandable I'll redo the crt later when I get free time

 

[LoudestProcedure]

@Sahlwrld and @Furina003 I re did the crt tell me if you agree or not?

 

[LoudestProcedure]

Bump

 

[Furina003]

@Sahlwrld and @Furina003 I re did the crt tell me if you agree or not?

I’m not sure whether the “three-hit assumption” can really be applied here, because the situation is different.
For example, if someone destroys a mountain with three strikes, and each strike destroys one-third of the mountain, that doesn’t count as mountain-level AP. It would actually be below mountain level, because each hit strike only destroys one-third of it.

So what I mean is,
We don’t know whether Noelle broke the sword gradually, or if the multiple swings simply built up to a final swing that destroyed it completely in a single decisive hit.
If it was the latter, then the level should match the usual calculation, since the final blow caused the full destruction.
But if the destruction happened gradually, then each strike would only scale to one-third of the calculated value.

Yeah, I’m neutral about it, I lean toward agreeing. I don’t know whether the method works perfectly or not, but I think it can be applied, or at least it’s the most reasonable interpretation for now.

 

[Vietthai96]

I agree with Bambu, the feat is unqualifiable

the statement it took a few uses for it to break assuming it's 3 swings for this sword to break

You can't assume it to be 3 swings, few could mean anything

All and all, i'm currently leaning toward disagree with the thread

 

[LoudestProcedure]

I agree with Bambu, the feat is unqualifiable

You can't assume it to be 3 swings, few could mean anything

All and all, i'm currently leaning toward disagree with the thread

May I asked how many swings should I account for?

 

[Vietthai96]

May I asked how many swings should I account for?

You can't, few could means manything, it could be 2 to 4, but sometime 10 to 30 could be considered as few, this is heavily depends on personal point of view, depends on the one who made the comment that to them, how many is considered as "few"

 

[LoudestProcedure]

You can't, few could means manything, it could be 2 to 4, but sometime 10 to 30 could be considered as few, this is heavily depends on personal point of view, depends on the one who made the comment that to them, how many is considered as "few"

Fair enough

 

[LoudestProcedure]

Bump

 

[FinePoint]

It seems too vague as to how she's actually breaking them, and what 'wielded with enough willpower' really means.

So, I can't see this being a solid addition. That said, if this seems significantly more impressive than their other shown feats, I wouldn't mind adding something like a "Possibly Far Higher".