-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports - 47
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- Status
- 3,818
- 832
The point is that 90% of anyone in the thread has read the entirety of To Aru. Matthew has 0 knowledge about the verse and has admitted to have a personal grudge against it due to old conflicts. He also pops in To Aru discussions just to provoke some members. I am in the wrong for being sarcastical, but he is also in the wrong for doing this. In cases where the members involved in the thread have the same knowledge as the "most knowledgeable supporter", saying that the specific supporters are "above them and should be the ones to give the veredict" is... Welp, a clear bias.
And Matt accuses me of "following him in threads" when, most of the time, he is the one who doesn't even know the verse but enters the thread to either give a lazy response or directly accuse me/other members.
And Matt accuses me of "following him in threads" when, most of the time, he is the one who doesn't even know the verse but enters the thread to either give a lazy response or directly accuse me/other members.
- 3,818
- 832
I wasn't going to post anymore and just wait for the veredict but I had to post it.
- 32,327
- 20,215
Stop accusing me of hating on To Aru and appearing on threads out of a grudge. This is exactly the sort of accusatory, finger-pointing behavior that I reported you for.
- 3,818
- 832
Devo ir pegar o screenshot, Matthew?
Literally everyone in the thread can see that you only pop out after me or Zemsum either debunk or try to argue.
Literally everyone in the thread can see that you only pop out after me or Zemsum either debunk or try to argue.
- 30,089
- 31,401
Stop spamming the RVR thread
- 10,748
- 6,476
Do not let this thread get derailed with bickering please.
Also If you have problems with someone' actions that's fine but there are nicer ways of getting that point across.
Also If you have problems with someone' actions that's fine but there are nicer ways of getting that point across.
- 32,327
- 20,215
"debunk or try to argue"
Please, Schro. Stop selling your own opinion as unarguable fact and trying to find malice behind me disagreeing with you, which you seen unable to accept as just something that happens.
Moreover, stop derailing this thread.
Please, Schro. Stop selling your own opinion as unarguable fact and trying to find malice behind me disagreeing with you, which you seen unable to accept as just something that happens.
Moreover, stop derailing this thread.
- 9,749
- 4,371
Take the off-topic argument somewhere else.
- 165,225
- 72,250
- Thread starter
- #251
To explain the situation a bit, Matthew and Weekly feel stressed out because a number of members are recurrently disrespectful and/or make accusations against them. They are doing their best to help out, behave well, and hold back equally harsh responses in order to be professional, so their concerns are very understandable. The gang-up mentality and paranoia against them in this community genuinely have to stop.
On the other hand, the accusations and verbal jabs have generally not been severe enough for us to ban our members, and in this case SchroKatze has otherwise been well-behaved as far as I am aware, so moderate instruction warnings usually seem more warranted. We have our standard procedures and regulations after all, and cannot start banning people for mostly not liking us personally.
At the same time, this widespread hostility has practically turned into a war of attrition, and I definitely don't want either Matthew or Weekly to eventually either explode or quit out of frustration. Suggestions in private from the staff regarding how we should deal with this would be appreciated. My area is dealing with organisation and edit-patrolling, not drama.
On the other hand, the accusations and verbal jabs have generally not been severe enough for us to ban our members, and in this case SchroKatze has otherwise been well-behaved as far as I am aware, so moderate instruction warnings usually seem more warranted. We have our standard procedures and regulations after all, and cannot start banning people for mostly not liking us personally.
At the same time, this widespread hostility has practically turned into a war of attrition, and I definitely don't want either Matthew or Weekly to eventually either explode or quit out of frustration. Suggestions in private from the staff regarding how we should deal with this would be appreciated. My area is dealing with organisation and edit-patrolling, not drama.
- 39,360
- 15,200
As a friends of Kaze and Mashu, this saddened me about their problem right now, Mashu situation already explained by Ant, but Kaze i will say this, he has anxiety and some mental problem which can make him depressed, maybe there is more but that's all i guess about Kaze right now, i know this since we talking each other on discord.
So what's the core? The stress. Stress can lead to a drama between two users from what i see.
Hopefully after i say this we can reach the conclusion about Mashu and Kaze.
So what's the core? The stress. Stress can lead to a drama between two users from what i see.
Hopefully after i say this we can reach the conclusion about Mashu and Kaze.
- 14,763
- 20,625
Zacisawesome101
Gave Spongebob 3-A Statistics without a CRT: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Spongebob_Squarepants_(Character)?diff=4314012&oldid=4300119
Since he's a new user I think a warning would suffice.
Gave Spongebob 3-A Statistics without a CRT: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Spongebob_Squarepants_(Character)?diff=4314012&oldid=4300119
Since he's a new user I think a warning would suffice.
- 10,748
- 6,476
I will give a warning to him. It wasn't malicious vandalism so i think he can stay here.
- 2,730
- 831
Wok guy already did
- 15,431
- 7,855
Banned match-up: https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2758193?useskin=oasis
Should be closed and OP given a warning.
Should be closed and OP given a warning.
- 6,104
- 5,102
We've been over this a million times. Closing threads is not a rule violation. If you have an issue with a staff's practice, contact an administrator or bureaucrat directly. Only rule violations belong on this thread. That is a violation of the:
- 165,225
- 72,250
- Thread starter
- #265
He did offer counterarguments in the previous thread, and afterwards explained to me that he has finals weeks coming up, and does not have the time to properly deal with this right now. I think that we should wait until his exams are over, so he can properly discuss this issue.
- 32,327
- 20,215
Thank you Sera.
And for the record, I did present counterarguments in the prior thread multiple times and numerous people also agreed.
... See, we can play this game all day. "Agreed / didn't agree, argued / didn't argue", different people will say different things.
And for the record, I did present counterarguments in the prior thread multiple times and numerous people also agreed.
... See, we can play this game all day. "Agreed / didn't agree, argued / didn't argue", different people will say different things.
- 165,225
- 72,250
- Thread starter
- #272
It is part of the staff's job to close discussions that are going in circles, are too controversial, or are out of control.
This one needed Matthew to be present to properly argue for his case in order to reach a conclusion, and since that is not possible at this point in time, the discussion needs to be postponed.
This one needed Matthew to be present to properly argue for his case in order to reach a conclusion, and since that is not possible at this point in time, the discussion needs to be postponed.
- 165,225
- 72,250
- Thread starter
- #275
Again, waiting for discussions to be properly handled by the staff is not a new feature in this wiki, and a few weeks is nothing by our standards. You are making a hen out of a feather/a big deal over very little, as usual when it comes to Matthew.
- 165,225
- 72,250
- Thread starter
- #277
@Yobo
The staff are supposed to evaluate the arguments and clear threads for application. If they are not involved, you can all argue with each other until you turn blue, and nothing will happen anyway. It is better to wait for a while.
I had to wait for years for a Naruto revision, for example.
The staff are supposed to evaluate the arguments and clear threads for application. If they are not involved, you can all argue with each other until you turn blue, and nothing will happen anyway. It is better to wait for a while.
I had to wait for years for a Naruto revision, for example.
CinnabarManx421
He/Him- 5,758
- 3,502
Hey guys, we should probably take this off of here. We're only gonna clog up the Thread this way. We have Walls for a reason you know, just sayin'.
- Status
