Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why does he know so much about the people here despite only starting his edits in early October? Sounds suspiciousHe really never actually participated in a TR thread as far as I remember, tho I know he wrote to Antvasima 2 times about some issue regarding TR stuff. He also wrote this on @RoggerReggor wall, I guess he has problems with us.
It's probably not really a proof against it but Vapourrrr told me he isn't @SoloKanekiWhy does he know so much about the people here despite only starting his edits in early October? Sounds suspicious
I've recently been contacted by TheDarkTriadz regarding thread evaluations, and I know a couple other staff members have as well. I strongly suspect they're not a troll, and that they're legitimately confused. Nevertheless, I've deleted their thread and I'll give them instructions.Hi, another report, I guess it's just troll
Staff discussion is for staff to discuss controversial topics..why is it me being a troll, its called a staff discussion thread ?
my crt is very controvesialStaff discussion is for staff to discuss controversial topics..
@Dereck03 , @Theglassman12 , @Qawsedf234 @DarkGrath ,@Marvel_Champion_07 , @Duedate8898Okay.
So about this then...
it's not that you aren't allowed to, it's that you don't have the ability to ping.@Dereck03 , @Theglassman12 , @Qawsedf234 @DarkGrath ,@Marvel_Champion_07 , @Duedate8898
Ik I cannot ping , but things got ignored, so sry for pinging.
If you want to give them another shot, sure. But I'd put them on probation and any examples of the previous banned activity would result in a perma-ban. Since most users aren't given a ban of this length without good reason.So about this then...
Well, the calculation has been accepted and seems pretty straightforward, so I do not think that anything warning or ban-worthy seems to have happened here.
Yeah ik , that's why I said that in firstit's not that you aren't allowed to, it's that you don't have the ability to ping.
Thanks for ur response, I'll be waiting for othersIf you want to give them another shot, sure. But I'd put them on probation and any examples of the previous banned activity would result in a perma-ban. Since most users aren't given a ban of this length without good reason.
Well, I am personally neutral, as I do not know enough about the issue in question.If you want to give them another shot, sure. But I'd put them on probation and any examples of the previous banned activity would result in a perma-ban. Since most users aren't given a ban of this length without good reason.
Yes, the verse already has a "possibly class 25" rating but the problem is that there is another version of the calc (Base Mikey lifts Chonbo with his leg) and the thread for replacing it is still open, I'm not bumping it because I'm planning to do other changes in other calcs too so I was planning to do everything in a single revision, but if you tell me it's fine to add it now I don't have problems with it.Well, the calculation has been accepted and seems pretty straightforward, so I do not think that anything warning or ban-worthy seems to have happened here.
Mikey lifts Chonbo
vsbattles.fandom.com
There are two calcs, one is for the grill, one is for the car hood, both were done in the same feat, in the same one kick, combining them only makes senseIf there's an accepted 1.3 Megajoule calc that they scale to changing it wouldn't warrant anything. But if there isn't then you did indeed break an editing rule.
the 1,3 mj would be the combination of two calc, tho I made the report only because a CGM didn't recommend to combine them.If there's an accepted 1.3 Megajoule calc that they scale to changing it wouldn't warrant anything. But if there isn't then you did indeed break an editing rule.
If the value isn't accepted than the change can't be made.There are two calcs, one is for the grill, one is for the car hood, both were done in the same feat, in the same one kick, combining them only makes sense
He made the same tier 0 troll profile 4 times now, someone deal with him.
He made the same tier 0 troll profile now, someone deal with him.
@Qawsedf234I'll talk to them
He made the same tier 0 troll profile 4 times now, someone deal with him.
I have blocked them for 3 months:Profile Deletion Requests Thread (New forum)
... What? How were these profiles even made? Who believed like half of these stuff was ok? A lot of stuff here is so wrong I can't even wrap my head around it. Eficiente.vsbattles.com
It has been remade 4 times already.
Also, what is this about? Are you admitting that you are trying to lightly troll other members?in reality we are just for a silly slander/fun and they for some reason so triggersome for it
I just copy pasted stuff. I'll be more aware of it next time.sandbox pages, as it messes up our wiki's organisation structure.
They were just minor changes though. Were they inaccurate?Edits without a CRT, and it's not the first time he's done it.
Yes, we need more staff input about that.Reminding again, cuz yeah why not
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
Not exactly a report, but this thread's pretty close to getting heated, so it'd be nice if a staff member could tell everyone to calm down. Are any of our discussion moderators willing to handle it please?vsbattles.com
Yeah, I mean, things were like this for a reason. And the user has a bad habit of changing things in profiles without a CRT, and I'm talking about more significant changes like these.They were just minor changes though. Were they inaccurate?
If you mean what I reported. Eh no, changed "possibly overpowered and killed Judy" to "overpowered and killed Judy", there is a difference between "possibly did it" and "she did it".He fixed the formatting and the language. This is a valid edit and does not violate any rule.
You are not required to create a CRT to fix something minor in the profile.
This guy keeps editing profiles without CRT.Edits without a CRT, and it's not the first time he's done it.