ExcelsisBerny
She/Her- 1,662
- 2,938
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
List them![]()
thats quite a lot lmao
- True dragons
- 12 guardian lord
- Hinata
- Yuuki
- Veldanava
- Infinity
- Votw
- Octagram
- Soeui
- Shuna
- Chloe Aubert
- Beretta
- Granbell
- Cardinal world
There is morethats quite a lot lmao
It should be but we don’t have the page for the other characters yetThere is more
This:Oh btw, by rule, it is mandatory to explicitly define the characters that scale to the level proposed.
So I would advise you to list them, so the nerd staff member does not show up later to call you out over it.
If I had to name them...
- Dimensions being the Otherworld but with extra steps (Dimensional Wall etc.) essentially, as established in the cosmology blog, means Dimensions are also the same tier. Anyone who presently scales to them is L1-C (5-D)
I’ll comment once I finish reading the cosmology blog.
I was asked to ping staff here
@Elizhaa @SomebodyData @Random-Helper323 @DarkDragonMedeus @Qawsedf234 @KingTempest @ActuallySpaceMan42 @Planck69
Sorry for the inconvenience, but your help is appreciated here.
I'm also busy, but will follow for now.I’ll comment once I finish reading the cosmology blog.
I was asked to ping staff here
@Elizhaa @SomebodyData @Random-Helper323 @DarkDragonMedeus @Qawsedf234 @KingTempest @ActuallySpaceMan42 @Planck69
Sorry for the inconvenience, but your help is appreciated here.
oh okay I apologize for bothering you while you're busy.I'm also busy, but will follow for now.
I think that's allowed.Method 1 works.
That said, not sure how I feel about the "Translation by @RaikiKurohane99 in Discord Dms"; if its allowed in the wiki, that's fine, but I would prefer to be able to directly see that, even in just a screenshot.
Looks good to me.oh okay I apologize for bothering you while you're busy.
I finished reading the arguments and the cosmology blog.
The arguments make sense to me.
Multiple infinite-sized objects of N-dimension (in this case, space-time continuities of 4 Dimensions) that also do not overlap/intersect can only be separated by a higher-dimensional space. What matters after that is whether this "Space" is signficant in size or not.
The texts confirm that it is very much significant in size. Method 2 is also a good supporting evidence, and when looked at as a whole, I think Low 1-C is reasonable here.
Also, I think the part about visuals can be used to show the significance of the Otherworld, as "spheres of light" that a character can compare to in size, in a space that would be universal in size in their eyes, shows that those spheres are insignificant compared to the whole of the "Otherworld".
NoWe now have 3 Admins agreements so we need 1 more to conclude the CRT?
Understandable. Though I've seen it being done elsewhere too many times so I thought it's fine, since Raiki can just confirm that they did it.Method 1 works.
That said, not sure how I feel about the "Translation by @RaikiKurohane99 in Discord Dms"; if its allowed in the wiki, that's fine, but I would prefer to be able to directly see that, even in just a screenshot.
I'm using your method of parallel space-times, and that to separate infinite or Infinitely expanding parallel space-times that don't overlap or intersect, they need to be separated by a higher dimensional space (which is then backed up by Method 2 which outright makes it clear the Otherworld is outside the higher dimensional stage of the Suspended World, the latter being something that freezes all of space and time across all worlds and the user and those that can move in it fight in a higher dimension, separated by a dimensional barrier)Oke, someone said my name was brought up (again)
Since you claims you are using my argument, can you give a TLDR of what exactly you are using?
i should seriously thinking about copyright my name so anyone brought it up should get copyright-striked
Yeesssssssssssssss
May I get permission to say your name![]()
After a month?Yeesssssssssssssss
Anyway i will come back to this later (not so soon)
p sure grace passed anywayAfter a month?
I hope you come back today
Can still wait a bit more in case Viett's definition of not so soon is actually soonerp sure grace passed anyway
Can still wait a bit more
this is not okeCan still wait a bit more in case Viett's definition of not so soon is actually sooner
(or by bribing him with a)
We're waiting for Vietthai96's opinion.Someone should close this thread and apply the revisions.
My Neutral Zone thread is that about time dimension for the neutral zone, not really about space, that why i was asking what exactly you are arguing for, using my argumentsI'm using your method of parallel space-times, and that to separate infinite or Infinitely expanding parallel space-times that don't overlap or intersect, they need to be separated by a higher dimensional space (which is then backed up by Method 2 which outright makes it clear the Otherworld is outside the higher dimensional stage of the Suspended World, the latter being something that freezes all of space and time across all worlds and the user and those that can move in it fight in a higher dimension, separated by a dimensional barrier)
The more the merrierThe hell? I just checked and you guys have 3 admin votes already, what the point of me being here? Bruhhh
It was also about space thoAnyway
My Neutral Zone thread is that about time dimension for the neutral zone, not really about space, that why i was asking what exactly you are arguing for, using my arguments
Based on tiering logic, this would place Neutral Space at 5-dimensional (5D). However, it would not qualify as Low 1-C, as that would require proof that this higher spatial axis has significant extent. That said, there may be alternative arguments that could establish such significance and potentially justify a Low 1-C tier
Yes, and that is accepted in the cosmology blog and previous staff threads.Anyway before i evaluate, i need some simplified clarification
1. The Otherworld contains multiple Low 2-C universes?
That has already been accepted, we just didn't argue if it was significant or not before.2. You want to say that the Otherworld is the separator that separate those universes?
The Otherworld, also known as Dimensional Space, is the Space that transcend Time, the container of Worlds, both Physical Worlds and Spiritual Worlds, being the space between them. They contain multiple worlds, and they themselves exist in multiple inside the Inter-Dimensional Gap, that is, Subspace.
Yeh, to be precise it's significant in size, the universes are insignificant compared to it (read Raiki's post a bit above on this page), etc.. And because the Otherworld is large enough it is Low 1-C?
Ummm?My Neutral Zone thread is that about time dimension for the neutral zone, not really about space, that why i was asking what exactly you are arguing for, using my arguments
In order for Neutral Space to contain these 4-dimensional macrocosms—which are parallel to each other and do not interact regardless of expansion—it would require displacement along a higher-dimensional axis, namely an additional spatial dimension beyond the standard three. This would ensure that no matter how far these macrocosms extend, they would never intersect or overlap.
Additionally, Neutral Space should be at least 2-C or larger in scale, as it is capable of containing 12 separate 4-dimensional macrocosms, each with its own independent time dimension.
Based on tiering logic, this would place Neutral Space at 5-dimensional (5D). However, it would not qualify as Low 1-C, as that would require proof that this higher spatial axis has significant extent. That said, there may be alternative arguments that could establish such significance and potentially justify a Low 1-C tier
NoWe're waiting for Vietthai96's opinion.
I agree with you here.The hell? I just checked and you guys have 3 admin votes already, what the point of me being here? Bruhhh
that there is no point in waiting for viet samaAbout what?